长江主要一级支流中华倒刺鲃形态差异比较 
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1. 中国水产科学研究院 长江水产研究所, 农业部淡水生物多样性保护重点实验室, 湖北 武汉 430223; 2. 华中农业大学 水产学院, 湖北 武汉 430070; 3. 中国水产科学研究院 淡水渔业研究中心, 江苏 无锡 214081

作者简介:

任泷(1988-), 男, 硕士研究生, 研究方向为鱼类生态学. E-mail: renlong21@163.com 吴金明(1984−), 共同第一作者, 男, 博士, 助理研究员, 研究方向为鱼类生态学. E-mail: jinming@yfi.ac.cn

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

S931

基金项目:

农业部公益性行业科研专项经费项目(200903048-02); 中国长江三峡集团公司科研项目(0701979); 长江水产研究所 所长基金(2012-01).


Morphological variation and discriminant analysis of Spinibarbus sinensis among Jialing River, Chishui River and Qingjiang River, the tributaries of Yangtze River 
Author:
Affiliation:

1. Key Laboratory of Freshwater Biodiversity Conservation, Ministry of Agriculture of China; Yangtze River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Wuhan 430223, China; 2. College of Fisheries, Huazhong Agricultural University,

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    采用传统形态学和框架分析法, 运用单因素方差分析、聚类分析、主成分分析和判别分析 4 种多元分析方法 对嘉陵江、赤水河、清江 3 鲃 个中华倒刺 (Spinibarbus sinensis)种群 288 尾样本的 30 个形态比例性状进行比较研究。 结果表明, 3 个种群的全长/体长、叉长/体长、体宽/体长等 29 个性状差异显著(P<0.05); 聚类结果显示, 嘉陵江种 群与赤水河种群首先聚为一类, 认为嘉陵江种群与赤水河种群形态最为相似; 主成分分析构建了8个主成分, 累计 贡献率为62.93%; 以Bayes逐步判别分析方法选用16个判别效果较好的比例性状建立了3 鲃 个中华倒刺 地理种群 的判别函数, 综合判别率达到 99.31%。研究结果显示, 嘉陵江种群与赤水河种群形态较为相似, 而两者与清江种 群形态差异较大。 鲃 本研究从形态特征上为长江上游中华倒刺 种群的划分提供了科学依据。

    Abstract:

    Spinibarbus sinensis is one of the most important freshwater fish species in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River. Unfortunately however, the stock of the wild population declined sharply in recent years. There is an urgent need to understand the population structure of the fish to aid development of conservation measures and allow for continued exploitation of this important species. We collected 288 individuals from three geographic areas: Jialingjiang River, Chishuihe River, tributaries of the upper reaches of Yangtze River, and Qingjiang River, a tributary of the middle Yangtze River. The morphological variation and biology of the three populations was investigated using traditional morphological (one-way analysis of variance, cluster analysis, principle component analysis, and discriminant analysis) and truss network analysis. The three populations of S. sineisis differed significantly(P<0.05) for 29 morphological proportional characters(e.g., TL/BL, FL/BL, BW/BL). A cluster analysis indicated that the morphological charactersof S.sineisis in Jialing River were most similar to S. sineisis in Chishui River. The principal component analysis yielded eight principal components with a cumulative contribution ratio of 62.93%. The discriminant analysis suggested that these three populations could be divided. The discriminant functions of the three populations of S. sineisis were established based on 16 morphological characters that differed significantly among the populations. The total accuracy of discrimination of S.sineisis from the three populations was 99.31%. Our results suggest that there are significant morphological differences among S.sinensis populations in the three sampling areas in the upper reaches of Yangtze River basin

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

任泷,吴金明,宋文,张家波,张沙龙,危起伟.长江主要一级支流中华倒刺鲃形态差异比较 [J].中国水产科学,2014,21(5):1029-1038
REN Long, WU Jinming, SONG Wen, ZHANG Jiabo, ZHANG Shalong, WEI Qiwei. Morphological variation and discriminant analysis of Spinibarbus sinensis among Jialing River, Chishui River and Qingjiang River, the tributaries of Yangtze River [J]. Journal of Fishery Sciences of China,2014,21(5):1029-1038

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2015-08-04
  • 出版日期: