| 3种养殖模式罗非鱼品质比较分析与评价 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 郭忠宝,肖蕊,黄卉,罗永巨,崔凯,肖俊,汪翔,阴晴朗,梁军能.3种养殖模式罗非鱼品质比较分析与评价[J].南方农业学报,2021,52(1):206-212. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 郭忠宝 肖蕊 黄卉 罗永巨 崔凯 肖俊 汪翔 阴晴朗 梁军能 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 广西水产科学研究院,南宁 530021;中国水产科学研究院南海水产研究所,广州 510642;安徽省农业科学院水产研究所,合肥 230001;上海海洋大学水产与生命学院,上海 201306 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项（CARS-46）；安徽省科技重大专项（18030701169）；南宁市科学研究与技术开发计划项目（20202104）；广西农业科技自筹经费项目（Z202064） |
| |
| 摘 要： | 【目的】探讨池塘工程化循环流水养殖（水槽组）、稻田养殖（稻田组）和池塘养殖（池塘组）3种不同养殖模式对罗非鱼肌肉营养品质的影响，为罗非鱼养殖业的提质增效提供参考依据。【方法】以吉富品系尼罗罗非鱼（GIFT，Oreochromis niloticus）为研究对象，选取平均体质量为595±88、625±75和644±21 g的罗非鱼分别饲养于水槽组、稻田组和池塘组养殖模式下，通过每克氮氨基酸评分模式、完全蛋白质评分模式和质构特性参数评价对肌肉营养成分进行分析比较，判断罗非鱼肌肉的营养价值。【结果】在常规营养成分方面，3组罗非鱼肌肉水分和粗灰分含量无显著差异（P> 0.05），水槽组罗非鱼肌肉粗脂肪含量显著高于池塘组和稻田组（P< 0.05，下同），稻田组罗非鱼肌肉粗蛋白含量显著高于水槽组和池塘组。在氨基酸组成方面，天门冬氨酸（Asp）、谷氨酸（Glu）、亮氨酸（Leu）和赖氨酸（Lys）含量最高，稻田组罗非鱼肌肉必需氨基酸总量（ΣEAA）显著高于池塘组和水槽组，3组罗非鱼肌肉ΣEAA/氨基酸总量（ΣTAA）范围为0.39～0.41，ΣEAA/非必需氨基酸总量（ΣNEAA）为0.65～0.68。在必需氨基酸评价方面，水槽组罗非鱼肌肉必需氨基酸总量（2689 mg/g N）和必需氨基酸指数（EAAI，87.96）最高，池塘组次之，稻田组最低。在肌肉质构特性方面，水槽组罗非鱼肌肉硬度显著低于稻田组和池塘组，胶黏性显著高于稻田组和池塘组。【结论】池塘工程化循环流水养殖模式下生产的罗非鱼肉质综合评价最佳，养殖效果好，且符合当前节能减排、提质增效的要求，可在适宜区域内大力推广应用。
|
| 关 键 词： | 罗非鱼 池塘工程化循环流水养殖 稻田养殖 池塘养殖 营养成分 分析 |
| 收稿时间： | 2020-05-13 |
Comparative analysis and evaluation of nutritional quality of tilapia in three aquaculture modes |
| |
| GUO Zhong-bao,XIAO Rui,HUANG Hui,LUO Yong-ju,CUI Kai,XIAO Jun,WANG Xiang,YIN Qing-lang,LIANG Jun-neng.Comparative analysis and evaluation of nutritional quality of tilapia in three aquaculture modes[J].Journal of Southern Agriculture,2021,52(1):206-212. |
| |
| Authors: | GUO Zhong-bao XIAO Rui HUANG Hui LUO Yong-ju CUI Kai XIAO Jun WANG Xiang YIN Qing-lang LIANG Jun-neng |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Guangxi Academy of Fishery Science, Nanning 530021, China;2. South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Guangzhou 510642, China;3. Institute of aquaculture, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hefei 230001, China;4. School of Fisheries and life, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China |
| |
| Abstract: | 【Objective】To explore the effects of three different culture modes on the nutritional quality of tilapia muscle, including in-pond raceway system aquaculture(IPRS group), paddy field aquaculture(paddy field group) and pond aquaculture(pond group), so as to provide reference for improving the quality and efficiency of tilapia culture.【Method】The GIFT(Oreochromis niloticus) in IPRS group, paddy field group and pond group were selected with body weights at 595±88, 625±75 and 644±21 g, respectively.The nutritional value of GIFT muscle was evaluated by analyzing and comparing the nutritional components of muscle with each gram of nitrogen amino acid score model, complete protein score model and texture characteristic parameters.【Result】In terms of conventional nutrients, the water content and crude ash content had no significant difference among the three groups(P> 0.05), the crude fat content of GIFT muscle in IPRS group was significantly higher than that in pond group and paddy field group(P< 0.05, the same below), and the crude protein content of GIFT muscle in paddy field group was significantly higher than that in IPRS group and paddy field group.In terms of amino acid composition, aspartic acid(Asp), glutamic acid(Glu), leucine(Leu) and lysine(Lys) contents were the highest.The total essential amino acid(ΣEAA) of GIFT muscle in paddy field group was significantly higher than that in pond group and IPRS group.The EAA/total amino acid(ΣTAA) ranged from 0.39 to 0.41, and ΣEAA/total non-essential amino acid(ΣNEAA) ranged from 0.65 to 0.68 in the three groups.In the evaluation of EAA, the total amount of EAA(2689 mg/g N) and the index of essential amino acid(EAAI, 87.96) in GIFT muscle of IPRS group were the highest, followed by pond group and rice field group.In terms of muscle texture characteristics, the hardness of GIFT muscle in IPRS group was significantly lower than that in paddy field group and pond group, and the stickiness was significantly higher than that in paddy field group and pond group.【Conclusion】The comprehensive evaluation of GIFT meat quality under the pond engineering recirculating water culture mode is the best, and the culture effect is good, which is consistent with the requirements of energy conservation, emission reduction, quality improvement and efficiency, so it can be vigorously promoted in suitable areas. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《南方农业学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《南方农业学报》下载全文 |
|
