共查询到19条相似文献，搜索用时 312 毫秒
1.
《畜牧兽医学报》2020,(8)
meq是鸡马立克病病毒(MDV)最重要的致瘤基因,在马立克病(MD)肿瘤发生中发挥关键作用。同时,它在疫苗株和强毒株之间具有明显的序列差异性。本文利用CRISPR/Cas9基因编辑技术,以MDV疫苗株CVI988/Rispens meq基因为靶点,设计合成gRNA,克隆构建pX459-gRNA质粒,转染CEF并感染CVI988/Rispens,然后对meq基因编辑的病毒噬斑进行克隆纯化,经过PCR扩增、测序分析及IFA鉴定,成功构建1株meq基因编辑的缺失毒株CVI988Δmeq-C7,为后续筛选和鉴定抗MD疫苗株MEQ单抗及鉴别诊断研究奠定了基础。 相似文献
2.
采用聚合酶链反应或反转录聚合酶链反应扩增出H5亚型禽流感病毒(AIV)的HA基因、网状内皮增生症病毒的长末端重复序列(LTR)、马立克氏病病毒(MDV)Rispens CVI988毒株基因组的sorf 1和sorf 2序列、两端带loxp位点的lac/smGFP标志基因,构建含这些基因的转移载体质粒pMHA;以MDV Rispens CVI988毒株的基因组DNA和PMHA质粒DNA共转染鸡胚成纤维细胞(CEF),采用同源重组方法将LTR、lac/smGFP和HA基因插入到MDV基因组,获得重组病毒rMDV-HA/GFP;以cre介导的同源重组去除lac/smGFP标志基因,再转染CEF,获得仅带LTR启动子和HA基因的重组MDV疫苗毒株rMDV-HA.rMDV-HA仍保留了MDV RispensCVI988疫苗毒株的复制特点,并能稳定表达AIV的HA. 相似文献
3.
《中国牧业通讯》2014,(18)
正大华农取得一项疫苗发明专利证书广东大华农动物保健品股份有限公司8月21日发布公告称,公司近日收到国家知识产权局颁发的一项发明专利证书,发明名称为"一株马立克氏病病毒疫苗株及其分离鉴定和应用"。大华农称,该发明在健康鸡场中分离到一株鸡马立克氏病病毒(MDV),命名为CVTR株。MDV CVTR株不会诱发鸡的肿瘤,对鸡群也没有免疫抑制作用。CVTR株病毒在鸡胚成纤维细胞(CEF)上或鸡体内比目前广泛使用的CVI988/Rispens疫苗株增殖更迅速。将CVTR株用作马立克氏病活疫苗的生产毒株所制备的疫苗,预防超强毒MDV诱发的鸡马立克氏病,其保护力优于目前国内外市场上应用 相似文献
4.
马立克氏病病毒（MDV）的致病性一直在不断增强中,甚至已出现了能抵抗CV1988/Rispens疫苗的特超强株。本实验室用BAC克隆技术构建了MDV中国野毒株的Meq基因缺失株,显示出在抗马立克氏病方面具有与美国Meq基因缺失株同样有效的保护性免疫效果,而且其自身没有明显的免疫抑制作用。对美国和中国的两个MDV的Meg基因缺失株的优缺点做了比较。 相似文献
5.
《中国畜牧业》2014,(18):16-17
<正>大华农取得一项疫苗发明专利证书广东大华农动物保健品股份有限公司8月21日发布公告称,公司近日收到国家知识产权局颁发的一项发明专利证书,发明名称为"一株马立克氏病病毒疫苗株及其分离鉴定和应用"。大华农称,该发明在健康鸡场中分离到一株鸡马立克氏病病毒(MDV),命名为CVTR株。MDV CVTR株不会诱发鸡的肿瘤,对鸡群也没有免疫抑制作用。CVTR株病毒在鸡胚成纤维细胞(CEF)上或鸡体内比目前广泛使用的CVI988/Rispens疫苗株增殖更迅速。将CVTR株用作马立克氏病活疫苗的生产毒株所制备的疫苗,预防超强毒MDV诱发的鸡马立克氏病,其保护力优于目前国内外市场上应用 相似文献
6.
鸡马立克氏病（MD）是由马立克氏病毒（MDV）引起的淋巴组织增生性肿瘤疾病。MD发病机理非常复杂，并能引起免疫抑制和许多功能障碍，给世界养禽业带来巨大经济损失，在我国也是三大禽病之一。疫苗接种是防制MD的主要手段，常用疫苗有HVT冻士苗、MDV血清1型CVI998/Rispens疫苗和由MDV血清1、2、3型组成的双价苗和三价苗。近来年，由于MDV超强毒株的出现和早期感染很难完全防制，使经典的火鸡疱疹病毒（HVT）疫苗常常发生免疫失败。近15年来用液氮苗取代HVT冻干疫苗已成为全世界的趋向。 相似文献
7.
《中国兽医学报》2017,(8)
为了解国内鸡群马立克病(MD)毒株目前的流行情况,在我国3个已免疫MD疫苗的白羽肉种鸡场暴发MD的鸡群中,通过临床剖检,组织病理学变化,病毒分离,IFA检测从发病鸡的淋巴细胞中分离到3株马立克氏病毒(MDV),并分别命名为SDAU1501、SDAU1502和SDAU1503。采用PCR方法扩增3株MDV的vIL8、pp38、meq致病基因,所得氨基酸序列与已发表的参考毒株序列进行比较分析,结果显示SDAU1501和SDAU1502的致病基因与强毒株的同源性达到97%以上,具有强毒特征;而SDAU1503的meq基因在第194位具有与CVI988同样的缺失(P),但其没有CVI988中177个核苷酸的插入突变,其具有与弱毒疫苗株的特征。MDV新的变异在不断发生,出现了不同类型的变异株,因此,对MD的流行情况与基因监测应当继续下去;同时,在MDV疫苗的研制更新上还有待于进一步研究。 相似文献
8.
应用鸭胚成纤维细胞(DEF)从曾免疫过CVI988/Rispens株疫苗的患马立克氏病(MD)肿瘤的三黄鸡中分离到一株马立克氏病病毒(MDV,命名为GXY2株。用禽肿瘤病聚合酶链式反应(PCR)鉴别诊断技术对患鸡的肿瘤组织病料及克隆纯化毒株的DEF培养物进行检测,结果均扩增到MDV-1强毒株的132-bpr特异性带和网状内皮组织增殖病病毒(REV)的长末端重复序列(LTR)。用基于抗MDV-1的gB蛋白单克隆抗体BA4、MEQ蛋白单克隆抗体3G12E6和抗REV的单克隆抗体11B118分别对毒株的培养物进行间接免疫荧光试验(IFA),结果样品只与抗MDV-1的单克隆抗体呈现阳性反应,而与抗REV的单克隆抗体呈现阴性反应。应用PCR技术扩增并测定了毒株的致瘤相关基因meq的核苷酸序列,并与其他MDV-1参考毒株的序列进行比较分析,结果发现其序列与我们之前分离鉴定的MDV-1野强毒株G2和YL040920高度同源。研究的结果表明,分离株GXY2为整合有REVLTR片段的重组MDV强毒株。 相似文献
9.
利用同源重组技术将禽网状内皮组织增生症病毒（REV）的长末端重复序列（LTR）整合进CVI988/Rispens疫苗株基因组中所构建成的重组马立克氏病病毒株（r MDV-LTR株）,具有较高的增殖效率。为比较r MDV-LTR株与亲本CVI988/Rispens株的免疫效力差异,开展了对这两种疫苗的比较试验。试验将这两种疫苗分别按照三个不同剂量经颈背部皮下接种1日龄SPF鸡。接种后第7 d,攻毒马立克氏病强毒株rMd5,连续观察60 d后进行剖检。临床病理观察结果发现,以不低于250 PFU/羽剂量的rMDV-LTR株或CVI988/Rispens株免疫SPF雏鸡都可以提供大于80%的免疫保护效率;以125 PFU/羽剂量的两种疫苗虽均不能提供大于80%的免疫保护效力,但rMDV-LTR株免疫组试验鸡未出现死亡,仅有2只鸡出现消瘦,剖解脏器无肿瘤,而CVI988/Rispens株免疫组鸡出现2只死亡,其中1只剖解后检出肿瘤。rMDV-LTR株和CVI988/Rispens株免疫组的免疫保护指数分别为77.78%和66.67%。由实验结果可见,在较小免疫剂量下,rMDV-LTR株免疫保护... 相似文献
10.
11.
应用荷兰农业部提供的鸡马立克氏病（ＭＤ）ＣＶＩ９８８／Ｒｉｓｐｅｎｓ Ⅰ型致弱种毒, 在农业部批准的符合ＧＭＰ 要求的生产车间研制出鸡马立克氏病ＣＶＩ９８８／Ｒｉｓｐｅｎｓ 疫苗。将按国际标准检验合格的三批疫苗及进口商品ＣＶＩ９８８／Ｒｉｓｐｅｎｓ 疫苗接种１ 日龄ＳＰＦ 雏鸡, 于７ 日龄经腹腔攻击鸡马立克氏病强毒（北京－ １ 株） 血毒, 全部鸡只隔离饲养观察至６０ 日龄并作全群剖检。经测定： 非免疫攻毒组１００％ 发病,健康对照组全部阴性, 三批国产ＣＶＩ９８８／Ｒｉｓｐｅｎｓ 疫苗保护指数分别为９０－０, ９０－０, ９３－３ , 进口商品苗保护率为９３－３ 。结果表明国产和进口ＣＶＩ９８８／Ｒｉｓｐｅｎｓ疫苗均能提供对ＭＤ 较高的免疫保护力, 国产疫苗的保护效果达到了国际同类产品的先进水平。 相似文献
12.
13.
Earlier studies have shown that the B haplotype has a significant influence on the protective efficacy of vaccines against Marek's disease (MD) and that the level of protection varies dependent on the serotype of MD virus (MDV) used in the vaccine. To determine if the protective glycoprotein gene gB is a basis for this association, we compared recombinant fowlpox virus (rFPV) containing a single gB gene from three serotypes of MDV. The rFPV were used to vaccinate 15.B congenic lines. Nonvaccinated chickens from all three haplotypes had 84%-97% MD after challenge. The rFPV containing gB1 provides better protection than rFPV containing gB2 or gB3 in all three B genotypes. Moreover, the gB proteins were critical, since the B*21/*21 chickens had better protection than chickens with B*13/*13 or B*5/*5 using rFPV with gB1, gB2, or gB3. A newly described combined rFPV/gB1gEgIUL32 + HVT vaccine was analyzed in chickens of lines 15 x 7 (B*2/*15) and N (B*21/*21) challenged with two vv+ strains of MDV. There were line differences in protection by the vaccines and line N had better protection with the rFPV/gB1gEgIUL32 + HVT vaccines (92%-100%) following either MDV challenge, but protection was significantly lower in 15 X 7 chickens (35%) when compared with the vaccine CVI988/Rispens (94%) and 301B1 + HVT (65%). Another experiment used four lines of chickens receiving the new rFPV + HVT vaccine or CVI988/Rispens and challenge with 648A MDV. The CVI 988/Rispens generally provided better protection in lines P and 15 X 7 and in one replicate with line TK. The combined rFPV/gB1gEgIUL32 + HVT vaccines protected line N chickens (90%) better than did CVI988/Rispens (73%). These data indicate that rFPV + HVT vaccines may provide protection against MD that is equivalent to or superior to CVI988/ Rispens in some chicken strains. It is not clear whether the rFPV/gB1gEgIUL32 + HVT vaccine will offer high levels of protection to commercial strains, but this vaccine, when used in line N chickens, may be a useful model to study interactions between vaccines and chicken genotypes and may thereby improve future MD vaccines. 相似文献
14.
Marek's disease (MD) is a lymphoproliferative disease of domestic chickens caused by a highly infectious, oncogenic alpha-herpesvirus known as Marek's disease virus (MDV). MD is presently controlled by vaccination. Current MD vaccines include attenuated serotype 1 strains (e.g., CVI988/Rispens), avirulent serotype 2 (SB-1), and serotype 3 (HVT) MDV strains. In addition, recombinant MDV strains have been developed as potential new and more efficient vaccines to sustain the success of MD control in poultry. One of the candidate recombinant MDV strains, named rMd5deltaMeq, was derived from Md5, a very virulent strain of MDV lacking the MDV oncogene Meq. Our earlier reports suggest that rMd5deltaMeq provided protection equally well or better than commonly used MD vaccines in experimental and commercial lines of chickens challenged with very virulent plus (vv+) strains of MDV. In this study, maternal antibody-positive (trial 1) and negative (trial 2) chickens from a series of relatively MD resistant lines were either vaccinated with the rMd5deltaMeq or CVI988/Rispens followed by infection of a vv+ strain of MDV, 648A, passage 10. This report presents experimental evidence that the rMd5deltaMeq protected significantly better than the CVI988/Rispens (P < 0.01) in the relatively resistant experimental lines of chickens challenged with the vv+ strain of MDV. Together with early reports, the rMd5deltaMeq appeared to provide better protection, comparing with the most efficacious commercially available vaccine, CVI988/Rispens, for control of MD in lines of chickens regardless of their genetic background. 相似文献
15.
16.
OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the Marek's Disease Virus-1 vaccine (strain BH 16) from field studies in comparison with the CVI 988 Rispens vaccine currently available in Australia. STUDY DESIGN: A small field trial was carried out on nine breeder flocks and a larger trial on 21 breeder flocks. All chickens were obtained from a commercial hatchery and each was vaccinated at hatch with cell-associated Herpes Virus of Turkeys vaccine. A group of chickens vaccinated with BH 16 vaccine was placed in one shed per property and the remainder were vaccinated with the Rispens vaccine and placed in the remaining sheds. At 25, 30, 35, and 40 weeks after hatch, the field veterinarian or farm manager examined all birds dying on two consecutive days in the designated placement sheds. RESULTS: In the small trial there was a significantly lower incidence of MD in birds vaccinated with the MDV-1 vaccine compared with the Rispens vaccine (P < 0.001). In a larger trial there was no difference in the incidence of MD between the treatment groups, due possibly to a lower rate of natural challenge. Egg production results and average weekly mortality results for both groups were similar. CONCLUSION: The present study describes an attenuated type 1 MD vaccine which is at least equivalent to a vaccine derived from the CVI 988 Rispens strain in terms of safety and efficacy when used in combination with HVT vaccine. 相似文献
17.
S.J. Baigent L.P. Smith L.J. Petherbridge V.K. Nair 《Research in veterinary science》2011,91(1):167-174
The ‘gold standard’ vaccine against Marek’s disease in poultry is the CVI988/Rispens virus, which is not easily distinguishable, antigenically or genetically, from virulent Marek’s disease herpesvirus. Accurate differential measurement of the CVI988 vaccine and virulent viruses is important to investigate mechanisms of vaccinal protection. Minimal sequence differences between CVI988 and virulent MDV strains restrict the application of molecular diagnostic methods such as real-time PCR to distinguish between these viruses. The use of bacterial-artificial-chromosome (BAC) cloned CVI988 virus, which carries the BAC vector sequences in place of the Us2 gene, allows its differential quantification from virulent strains using real-time PCR assays that target the BAC vector sequence and the US2 gene respectively. These novel assays allowed investigation of replication of both serotype-1 vaccine virus (cloned CVI988) and challenge virus (RB-1B strain) in tissues of individual chickens in an experimental vaccination-challenge model of Marek’s disease. 相似文献
18.
Objective To develop a serotype 1 Marek's disease (MD) vaccine from a very virulent MDV (vvMDV) pathotype and demonstrate safety and efficacy against early challenge with very virulent field strains in the presence of maternal antibody.
Study design Strain BH 16 was isolated and attenuated by serial cell culture passage. One of two cloned passages was selected for vaccine development following early laboratory-scale protection trials in commercial birds. Comparative protection trials were carried out on the BH 16 vaccine and on a CVI 988 Rispens vaccine using commercial and SPF chickens. Challenge viruses used were either a low passage strain BH 16 virus, the Woodlands No. 1 strain or MPF 57 strain of MDV. The BH 16 vaccine was back-passaged in SPF chickens six times and virus recovered from the final passage and the original vaccine virus were tested for safety. The immunosuppressive potential of the BH 16 and Rispens vaccines was also assessed in parallel.
Results The BH 16 and Rispens vaccines induced comparable levels of protection when used as monovalent or multi-valent vaccines, although protection achieved with the mono-valent vaccines was lower. No gross tumour formation was evident in any birds receiving the BH 16 vaccine or bird-passaged virus, although microscopic lesions were present in 2/12 birds that received the bird-passaged virus. In tests for immunosuppression, there was no histological evidence of damage to either the bursa of Fabricius or the thymus.
Conclusion The BH 16 vaccine was shown to be safe and at least as protective as the Rispens vaccine against three highly virulent MD challenge viruses. 相似文献
Study design Strain BH 16 was isolated and attenuated by serial cell culture passage. One of two cloned passages was selected for vaccine development following early laboratory-scale protection trials in commercial birds. Comparative protection trials were carried out on the BH 16 vaccine and on a CVI 988 Rispens vaccine using commercial and SPF chickens. Challenge viruses used were either a low passage strain BH 16 virus, the Woodlands No. 1 strain or MPF 57 strain of MDV. The BH 16 vaccine was back-passaged in SPF chickens six times and virus recovered from the final passage and the original vaccine virus were tested for safety. The immunosuppressive potential of the BH 16 and Rispens vaccines was also assessed in parallel.
Results The BH 16 and Rispens vaccines induced comparable levels of protection when used as monovalent or multi-valent vaccines, although protection achieved with the mono-valent vaccines was lower. No gross tumour formation was evident in any birds receiving the BH 16 vaccine or bird-passaged virus, although microscopic lesions were present in 2/12 birds that received the bird-passaged virus. In tests for immunosuppression, there was no histological evidence of damage to either the bursa of Fabricius or the thymus.
Conclusion The BH 16 vaccine was shown to be safe and at least as protective as the Rispens vaccine against three highly virulent MD challenge viruses. 相似文献
19.
Derivation,safety and efficacy of a Marek's disease vaccine developed from an Australian isolate of very virulent Marek's disease virus 总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4
OBJECTIVE: To develop a serotype 1 Marek's disease (MD) vaccine from a very virulent MDV (vvMDV) pathotype and demonstrate safety and efficacy against early challenge with very virulent field strains in the presence of maternal antibody. STUDY DESIGN: Strain BH 16 was isolated and attenuated by serial cell culture passage. One of two cloned passages was selected for vaccine development following early laboratory-scale protection trials in commercial birds. Comparative protection trials were carded out on the BH 16 vaccine and on a CVI 988 Rispens vaccine using commercial and SPF chickens. Challenge viruses used were either a low passage strain BH 16 virus, the Woodlands No. 1 strain or MPF 57 strain of MDV. The BH 16 vaccine was back-passaged in SPF chickens six times and virus recovered from the final passage and the original vaccine virus were tested for safety. The immunosuppressive potential of the BH 16 and Rispens vaccines was also assessed in parallel. RESULTS: The BH 16 and Rispens vaccines induced comparable levels of protection when used as monovalent or multivalent vaccines, although protection achieved with the monovalent vaccines was lower. No gross tumour formation was evident in any birds receiving the BH 16 vaccine or bird-passaged virus, although microscopic lesions were present in 2/12 birds that received the bird-passaged virus. In tests for immunosuppression, there was no histological evidence of damage to either the bursa of Fabricius or the thymus. CONCLUSION: The BH 16 vaccine was shown to be safe and at least as protective as the Rispens vaccine against three highly virulent MD challenge viruses. 相似文献