共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 171 毫秒
1.
众所周知,生态园林在城市生态建设和生态环境价值方面占据着重要的地位。只有慎重考虑了生态园林养护管理,我们才能建设好生态园林城市。当然,建设生态园林是不同于其它园林的,园林的生态价值、树种和植物多样性都应该是我们考虑的问题。 相似文献
2.
随着我国社会经济的快速发展,城市化进程加快。城市的生态问题已成为城市可持续发展的大问题。本文阐述了建设生态园林城市的重要意义,指出了我国城市园林建设的现状,提出了建设生态园林的措施。 相似文献
3.
随着我国社会经济的快速发展,城市化进程加快,城市的生态问题已成为城市可持续发展的大问题。本文从城市可持续发展的角度出发,阐述了建设生态园林城市的重要意义,提出了建设生态园林的对策和措施。 相似文献
4.
生态园林城市建设及其植物配置 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
随着城市和园林的发展,建设生态性质的园林城市是园林建设和城市规划的新目标。本文简要论述了生态园林城市的概念、功能,建设生态园林城市的目标及所应用的生态学原则,并对生态园林城市的植物配置进行了分析。 相似文献
5.
随着城市化进程,城市的生态环境已经遭到了破坏,只注重经济发展的模式已经不能适应人们的需求,经济与生态保护并重才是可持续发展之道。在城市中建设生态园林,改善空气质量,恢复生态环境,而海绵城市也是城市发展的一大内容,解决城市内涝、节约水资源以及提高水资源利用率。本文主要针对海绵城市理念下的城市生态园林设计进行了详细的探究,对其在实际应用中存在的问题进行了分析,并展望了海绵城市在生态园林城市中的应用,希望能够有效提升我国城镇化建设的质量。 相似文献
6.
7.
城市化建设进程加快,环境问题日益突出,城市建设中加大对生态的关注,也衍生出生态园林城市建设概念。但是我国生态园林城市建设还处于起步阶段,在实践中不可避免地存在部分问题。本文主要对生态园林城市建设中的问题进行剖析,明确问题提出具体的解决对策,以期更好地推进我国生态园林城市建设。 相似文献
8.
生态园林作为城市园林的发展方向,是城市的基础设施建设和国土绿化的重要组成部分。不仅可以美化自然调节城市区域环境,还能净化空气,改善人居生活环境,对于生态城市建设与发展至关重要。本文阐述了生态园林的概念、意义,针对我国当前城市园林建设存在的问题,提出城市建设中生态园林设计原则。 相似文献
9.
10.
城市行道树应用探讨——以安徽蚌埠市行道树配置为例 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
<正>随着我国经济的快速发展和绿色环保意识的增强,人们对园林事业日益关注,评价城市园林发展的"省级园林城市"、"国家级园林城市"、"国家森林城市"等标准也不断更新,特别是随着北京申奥成功和上海申博成功,生态园林的发展更是上了一个新的台阶。作为城市主干树的道路行道树也在不断发展中,形成了自己的风格和特色。 相似文献
11.
12.
13.
分析城市广场建设的必要性,总结邯郸市城市广场建设现状,提出城市广场设计要以人为本、合理规划、突出主题。 相似文献
14.
随着城市化发展,城市绿化已成为城市宜居标准和生活幸福指数的重要标志。城市绿化建设应超前谋划、统一协调、和谐发展,使城市绿化建设与城市整体规划相结合、与生态环境建设相联系,构建立体化多层次的城市绿色系统,以提升城市的品位和居民生活幸福指数。 相似文献
15.
随着国内城市化进程的推进,建筑用地与居住环境的矛盾日益突出,建设可持续发展的建筑与城市成为当今最受关注的话题。在这样的大背景下,人们越来越关注城市生态环境的建设,屋顶花园的建设已经成为现代建筑发展的必然趋势。为了保持一个良好的城市人居生态环境,见缝插绿的观念已深入人心,屋顶绿化无疑会在将来的城市化进程中扮演重要角色。 相似文献
16.
Urban domestic gardens (X): the extent &; structure of the resource in five major cities 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
Private domestic gardens are known to constitute a considerable proportion of “green space” in urban areas and are therefore
of potential significance for maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem service provision in such areas. However, little is known
about the actual size and nature of this resource. This study provides the first detailed audit and comparison of the size
and structure of the domestic garden resource across different cities in the U.K. (Edinburgh, Belfast, Leicester, Oxford and
Cardiff). The urban area of each city covered by domestic gardens ranged from 21.8% to 26.8% and was positively correlated
with variation in human population density and housing density. In a random sample of at least 500 houses in each city, 99%
had associated gardens, the mean areas of which ranged from 155.4 m2 to 253.0 m2 and were closely associated with housing type (terraced, semi-detached or detached houses). Relatively small gardens (< 400 m2) contributed disproportionately to the total garden area of each city, being more numerous than larger gardens. There was
no clear relationship between garden area and distance to the edge of any of the cities. These and other results are discussed
in terms of the potential role of urban gardens as wildlife habitats and the implications for housing policy. 相似文献
17.
18.
时代的发展,人们对生态环境要求的提高,合理利用城市空闲土地,加强城市街头绿地建设,是当前提高城市绿化覆盖率和绿化水平的有效途径。 相似文献
19.
20.
This paper considers urban gardens as lived spaces which have an important role in reconnecting with nature in an urban environment, but also as an archive of concepts related to culture and everyday life. In this context, the paper studies the character of three of Belgrade’s urban gardens and their contribution to the quality of everyday life in the large-scale socialist residential settlements built during the 1970s. Focus is placed on establishing relations between the dwelling culture, social and cultural needs and changes, and the dominant architectural and planning paradigms of modernism and post-modernism. Belgrade’s urban gardens were created and developed spontaneously (most often non-legally) as self-organized citizens’ acts. Research presented in our case studies confirms the paper’s initial assumption that the urban gardens in Belgrade are still considered marginal and certainly not representative urban practices, overshadowed by the planned urban conceptions and socio-political actions. In this sense, we may notice the lack of a systematic approach to managing these gardens, and complete absence of legislation either provided by authorities, private or public bodies or even associations. Although the urban gardens emerged in socialism outside of any rules and regulations, they promoted the values of an active relationship between the user, dwelling culture and immediate residential surroundings, and contributed to improving the dwelling culture of the “new working class” in the socialist dwelling units. Also, the gardens were not only a place for producing food in financially difficult times, especially during the post-socialist transition of the 1990s, but above all a place associated with socialization and a “sense of home”. Recognizing the benefits of urban gardens and accordingly raising awareness about this concept in the city, together with the adoption of appropriate regulations, would certainly be of immense relevance to urban gardening and generally landscape quality in Serbia. 相似文献