共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 625 毫秒
1.
本文以奶牛养殖小区新的生产工艺流程和标准化建设为切入点,以甘肃省临泽县平川镇芦湾村奶牛养殖小区为示范点进行了研究。按照当前奶牛规模化养殖基础与现行标准设计,标准化奶牛养殖小区每户年存栏奶牛30头,每户年可实现纯收入8.1万元。本小区建设模式概括为＂51266＂模式,即小区占地50亩,建设1座挤奶厅,容纳20个养殖单元,存栏奶牛600头,实行＂六统一＂管理。 相似文献
2.
近年来，随着奶牛养殖业的迅猛发展，各地建设了一大批奶牛养殖小区，它改变了那种传统的农户家庭养殖分散、粗放的养殖模式，提高了农村奶牛养殖的现代化水平，实现了统一管理．利于科学技术的推广和应用。但在一些奶牛小区中，还存在着诸多问题，因此加强奶牛小区的建设与管理就显得尤为重要。 相似文献
3.
4.
西部农村饲草资源充裕,发展奶牛养殖小区有利于减少草料运输费用,有利于减轻城郊养牛环境污染,有利于改善牛奶质量。本文提出小区建设应注意的五个问题:注重奶牛质量;采用胚胎移植技术,提高小区牛群的个体产奶量:种养结合,建立与奶牛养殖业配套的饲草生产基地;改进饲养管理,推行混合日粮饲养技术;实行行业准入制度,控制小区环境污染,提高牛奶质量,生产绿色奶品。 相似文献
5.
6.
7.
奶牛养殖小区经过几十年的发展和探索,至今已有相对成熟的发展水平,奶牛养殖小区的增加对促进奶业发展、提高奶牛集约化、规模化程度、提高牛奶质量、提升奶牛饲养管理水平起到重要作用。同时,奶牛养殖小区的建设有利于改善养殖地区农村的生活环境,保证高质量原奶供应,降低饲养成本。为了使奶牛养殖小区向前发展,在小区管理上要注意以下几点:一、从思想入手,做好服务工作目前,富裕县的多个奶牛养殖小区由养殖大户或奶站经营者投资建设,他们将部分牛舍免费给村里的养牛户使用,或者以"托牛所"的模 相似文献
8.
随着奶牛养殖规模的不断扩大,养殖小区的建设就成为一种必然的趋势,但是如何做好养殖小区的会计核算,有效节约投资就逐渐成为摆在众多奶牛养殖户面前的首要难题.基于这样的现实背景,文章以"奶牛养殖小区的建设"为主要研究对象,就其投资与会计核算展开深入、细致的研究与分析,希望能为进一步发挥奶牛养殖小区的重要作用提供有力的依据和参考. 相似文献
9.
奶牛养殖小区是新型的畜牧业生产组织形式,是在一定范围内,按照集约化养殖要求,建立的有一定规模、较为规范、严格管理的奶牛专一饲养区域。奶牛养殖小区的健康发展不仅有利于优化畜牧业区域布局,提高牛奶产品质量,改善群众生产、生活环境,增加农民收入,且有利于提高奶产品市场竞争力。1规划管理建设绿色生态奶牛养殖小区,选址是关键,建区地址必须符合奶牛生产的各项基本要求,要做到科 相似文献
10.
《北方牧业(奶牛)》2008,(6):61
从有关部门了解到．天津市以标准化奶牛养殖小区建设标准及小区建设规划为指导．从今年开始启动现代设施化奶牛养殖小区建设项目．年内建设6个．累计建设30个现代设施化奶牛养殖小区。据了解,奶牛养殖规模化、集约化、标准化不仅可以保障乳制品质量安全,提高市场竞争力,还可以通过标准化生产,达到增产增效、节本增效、优质增效的目的。 相似文献
11.
目前新疆巴州地区奶牛业以乳品企业为主,家庭养殖为副。巴州地区现有养殖的奶牛共52 700多头,其中,农村散养奶牛数量比较少。农村饲料来源丰富、劳动力足够,家庭饲养奶牛已成为农户脱贫致富奔小康的一条生产门路。本文主要从培育龙头企业带动,逐步建立完善奶牛合作社奶牛业生产体系,同时对开辟青贮饲料来源及作好加工调制、逐步做到日粮标准化、饲养管理规模化、统一搞好奶牛配种及良种繁育等方面提出了对策分析。 相似文献
12.
奶牛产业是甘南州的优势特色产业.通过提高农牧民对奶牛产业的认识,建立奶牛生产优势带,加强奶牛品种良种化建设,推广科学饲养管理方法,有利于促进农牧民增收和甘南奶牛产业可持续发展. 相似文献
13.
宁夏地处黄金畜牧养殖带,具有得天独厚的奶牛产业发展优势。以习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想为指导,宁夏奶产业正在迈向高质量发展的道路。宁夏把奶业振兴作为实施乡村振兴战略、提高奶源质量、推进农业高质量发展的重要举措。宁夏A乳业公司按照“草畜一体化”的产业思路以“种优质草,养健康牛,产优质奶”为导向,以发展规模优质高产牧草为基础,大力推进规模化奶牛饲养。本研究以A乳业公司为例,探讨宁夏规模奶牛养殖场的发展现状及存在的主要问题,并提出针对性的对策建议,以期为规模奶牛养殖场及相关政府、管理部门制定奶业振兴战略提供参考。 相似文献
14.
奶牛养殖小区建设的技术要求 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
奶牛业在当前农村条件下得到了积极的发展，畜牧养殖小区在各地蓬勃兴起。本文主要论述了奶牛养殖小区设计时应遵循的原则、奶牛场设计的主要技术参数以及应注意的问题。 相似文献
15.
Dairy Australia is the national service body for the Australian dairy industry. Its role is to help farmers adapt to a changing operating environment and achieve a profitable, sustainable dairy industry. Although the use of antibiotics in Australian agriculture is relatively low in global terms, Dairy Australia recognises important drivers for continuous improvement in antimicrobial stewardship (AMS). Dairy Australia’s first strategic priority is to support profitable farms. This priority has driven the development of a range of on‐farm change management programs in the animal health and welfare fields to optimise the unit cost of production and dairy cattle welfare. Dairy Australia’s third strategic priority is to further develop a ‘trusted dairy industry’. Previous and current work under these two strategies position the dairy industry favourably with respect to confronting the challenge of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and supporting sound AMS with the guiding principle of ‘as little as possible, as much as necessary’. However, given an incomplete but ongoing threat of AMR, more work is needed. Supported by Dairy Australia, the dairy industry has developed an antimicrobial use strategy aligning with the Australian Animal Sector National AMR Plan 2018. 相似文献
16.
17.
18.
Risk of removal and effects on milk production associated with paratuberculosis status in dairy cows
Lombard JE Garry FB McCluskey BJ Wagner BA 《Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association》2005,227(12):1975-1981
OBJECTIVE: To determine effects on production and risk of removal related to Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis (MAP) infection at the individual animal level in dairy cattle. DESIGN: Longitudinal study. ANIMALS: 7,879 dairy cows from 38 herds in 16 states. PROCEDURE: A subset of dairy cattle operations that participated in the National Animal Health Monitoring System Dairy 2002 study was evaluated via a serum ELISA for antibodies against MAP and categorized according to ELISA score. Dairy Herd Improvement Association records were obtained to collect current and historical lactation data and removal (ie, culling) information. Production variables were evaluated on the basis of serum ELISA category. RESULTS: Cows with strong positive results had mature equivalent (ME) 305-day milk production, ME 305-day maximum milk production, and total lifetime milk production that were significantly lower than cows in other categories. No differences were observed for ME 305-day fat and protein percentages, age, lactation, and lactation mean linear somatic cell count score between cows with strong positive results and those with negative results. After accounting for lactation number and relative herd-level milk production, cows with strong positive results were significantly more likely to have been removed by 1 year after testing. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Without management changes designed to reduce the farm-level prevalence of MAP infection, paratuberculosis will continue to reduce farm income by decreasing milk production and potentially increasing premature removal from the herd. 相似文献
19.
20.
H. Khatib I. Zaitoun Y.M. Chang C. Maltecca & P. Boettcher 《Zeitschrift für Tierzüchtung und Züchtungsbiologie》2007,124(1):26-28
In dairy cattle, many studies have reported quantitative trait loci (QTL) on the centromeric end of chromosome 14 that affect milk production traits. One of the candidate genes in this QTL region – thyroglobulin (TG) – was previously found to be significantly associated with marbling in beef cattle. Thus, based on QTL studies in dairy cattle and because of possible effects of this gene on fat metabolism, we investigated the association of TG with milk yield and composition in Holstein dairy cattle. A total of 1279 bulls from the Cooperative Dairy DNA Repository Holstein population were genotyped for a single nucleotide polymorphism in TG used previously in beef cattle studies. Analysis of 29 sire families showed no significant association between TG variants and milk production traits. Within‐sire family analysis suggests that TG is neither the responsible gene nor a genetic marker in association with milk production traits. 相似文献