首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
Objective— To compare the biomechanical properties of cervical arthroplasty to a ventral slot procedure and pin‐polymethylmethacrylate (pin‐PMMA) fixation. Sample Population— Fresh cadaveric cervical (C2–T1) spines from 6 large dogs. Methods— Four spinal conditions were studied in each spinal specimen: intact, disk arthroplasty, ventral slot, and fixation with smooth pin‐PMMA at C5–C6 intervertebral space. Axial compression, torsion, flexion–extension, and lateral bending moments were sequentially tested on each specimen for the 4 spinal conditions. Data from the C3–C4, C4–C5, C5–C6, and C6–C7 vertebral motion units (VMUs) were compared among treatments. Results— In axial compression and torsion, the ventral slot procedure allowed significantly less motion than intact, pin‐PMMA, and arthroplasty groups at C5–C6. In lateral bending and flexion–extension, pin‐PMMA had the least motion of C5–C6, followed by the arthroplasty group, intact spine, and ventral slot, all of which were significantly different from each other. Overall, the artificial disk was better able to mimic the behavior of the intact specimens compared with the ventral slot and pin‐PMMA, producing similar displacements in axial compression and rotation in torsion, but more limited motion than intact in flexion–extension and in lateral bending. Conclusion— Cervical spine specimens with an implanted prosthesis have biomechanical behaviors more similar to an intact spine compared with spinal specimens with ventral slot and pin‐PMMA procedures. Cervical arthroplasty may then preserve some of the motion in the affected area after neural decompression while providing distraction. Clinical Relevance— Cervical arthroplasty should be further investigated in vivo to determine if it is a viable alternative to the ventral slot or pin‐PMMA procedures for surgical treatment of cervical diseases in dogs and in particular for treatment of disk‐associated caudal cervical spondylomyelopathy.  相似文献   

2.
AIMS: To provide veterinarians with confidence when using a commercially available epoxy resin in external skeletal fixators (ESF), testing was conducted to determine exothermia during curing of the epoxy resin compared to polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), the hardness of the epoxy resin as a bar over 16 weeks, and the strength of the epoxy resin bar compared with metal clamps in similarly constructed Type 1a ESF constructs simulating the repair of feline long bone fractures.

METHODS: Exothermia of the epoxy resin during curing was tested against PMMA with surface temperatures recorded over the first 15 minutes of curing, using four samples of each product. The hardness of 90 identical epoxy resin bars was tested by subjecting them to cyclic loads (1,000 cycles of 20.5?N, every 7 days) over a 16-week period and impact testing 10 bars every 2 weeks. Ten bars that were not subjected to cyclic loads were impact tested at 0 weeks and another 10 at 16 weeks. Strength of the epoxy resin product, as a bar and clamp composite, was tested against metal SK and Kirschner-Ehmer (KE) clamps and bars in Type 1a, tied-in intramedullary pin, ESF constructs with either 90° or 75° pin placement, subjected to compressive and bending loads to 75?N.

RESULTS: The maximum temperature during curing of the epoxy resin (min 39.8, max 43.0)°C was less than the PMMA (min 85.2, max 98.5)°C (p<0.001). There was no change in hardness of the epoxy resin bars over the 16 weeks of cyclic loading (p=0.58). There were no differences between the median strength of the epoxy resin, SK or KE ESF constructs in compression or bending when tested to 75?N (p>0.05). Stiffness of constructs with 75° pin placement was greater for SK than epoxy resin constructs in compression (p=0.046), and was greater for KE than epoxy resin constructs in bending (p=0.033).

CONCLUSIONS: The epoxy resin tested was found to be less exothermic than PMMA; bars made from the epoxy resin showed durability over an expected fracture healing timeframe and had mechanical strength characteristics comparable to metal bar and clamp ESF constructs.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The epoxy resin ESF construct tested in this study can be considered a suitable replacement for SK or KE ESF constructs in the treatment of feline long-bone fractures, in terms of mechanical strength.  相似文献   

3.
OBJECTIVE: To compare application time, accuracy of tibial plateau slope (TPS) correction, presence and magnitude of rotational and angular deformities, and mechanical properties of 5 canine tibial plateau leveling methods. SAMPLE POPULATION: 27 canine tibial replicas created by rapid prototyping methods. PROCEDURE: The application time, accuracy of TPS correction, presence and magnitude of rotational and angular deformation, and construct axial stiffness of 3 internal fixation methods (tibial plateau leveling osteotomy, tibial wedge osteotomy, and chevron wedge osteotomy [CWO]) and 2 external skeletal fixation (ESF) methods (hinged hybrid circular external fixation and wedge osteotomy linear fixation [WOLF]) were assessed. RESULTS: Mean bone model axial stiffness did not differ among methods. Mean application time was more rapid for WOLF than for other methods. Mean TPSs did not differ from our 5 degrees target and were lower for ESF methods, compared with internal fixation methods. Mean postoperative rotational malalignment did not differ from our target or among groups. Mean postoperative medio-lateral angulation did not differ from our target, except for CWO. Internal fixation methods lead to axially stiffer constructs than ESF methods. Reuse of ESF frames did not lead to a decrease in axial stiffness. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The 5 tibial plateau leveling methods had acceptable geometric and mechanical properties. External skeletal fixation methods were more accurate as a result of precise data available for determining the exact magnitude of correction required to achieve a 5 degrees TPS.  相似文献   

4.
Five configurations of pins or screws interconnected with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) were applied to isolated canine lumbar spines (L2 to L5) in which a complete fracture-luxation had been produced at L3 to L4. Twenty-five repaired spines and five intact control spines were subjected to four-point bending and tested once to failure in ventral flexion. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of pin number, pin angle, and use of 3.5-mm cortical bone screws instead of smooth 3.2-mm diameter pins on rigidity and ultimate strength of spinal fractures repaired by the implant-PMMA fixation technique. Bending moment versus the angular deformation curves were recorded. Rigidity, bending moment at 10° angular deformation, moment at failure, and deformation at failure of each type of fixation were compared using analysis of variance. Spinal segments stabilized with eight pin-PMMA fixation had significantly greater rigidity and strength at failure than four pin-PMMA fixations ( P < .05). Furthermore, spinal segments stabilized with eight pins angled away from the fracture failed at significantly greater bending moment than those with eight pins angled toward the fracture ( P < .05). However, for four-pin fixation, greater strength was achieved by angling pins in the bone toward the fracture site ( P < .05). Screw-PMMA fixations failed by screw bending and were less rigid and weaker at failure than the corresponding configuration of pin-PMMA fixation ( P < .05).  相似文献   

5.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the biomechanics of cervical vertebral motion units (VMUs) before and after a ventral slot procedure and after subsequent pin-poly-methylmethacrylate (pin-PMMA) fixation and to assess the use of smooth and positive-profile threaded (PPT) pins in pin-PMMA fixation and intravertebral pin placement. SAMPLE POPULATION: Cervical portions (C3 through C6 vertebrae) of 14 cadaveric canine vertebral columns. PROCEDURE: Flexion and extension bending moments were applied to specimens before and after creation of a ventral slot across the C4-C5 intervertebral space and after subsequent smooth or PPT pin-PMMA fixation at that site. Data for the C3-C4, C4-C5, and C5-C6 VMUs were compared among treatments and between pin types, and pin protrusion was compared between pin types. RESULTS: Compared with values in intact specimens, ventral slot treatment increased neutral zone range of motion (NZ-ROM) by 98% at the treated VMUs and appeared to decrease overall ROM at adjacent VMUs; pin-PMMA fixation decreased NZ-ROM by 92% at the treated VMUs and increased overall NZ-ROM by 19% to 24% at adjacentVMUs. Specimens fixed with PPT pins were 82% (flexion) and 80% (extension) stiffer than smooth-pin-fixed specimens. Overall, 41% of pins protruded into foramina; PPT pins were more likely to protrude into transverse foramina. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results indicated that fixation of a cervical VMU alters the biomechanics of adjacent VMUs and may contribute to intervertebral degeneration of adjacent intervertebral disks. Use of threaded pins may lower the incidence of pin loosening and implant failure but enhances the likelihood of transverse foramina penetration.  相似文献   

6.
Objective: To define the kinematic motion patterns of the canine cervical spine, with a particular emphasis on identifying differences between the cranial (C2–C4) and caudal (C5–C7) segments, and to determine the significance of coupled motions (CM) in the canine cervical spine. Study Design: Cadaveric biomechanical study. Sample Population: Cervical spines of 8 Foxhounds. Methods: Spinal specimens were considered free of pathology based on radiographic, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging examinations. All musculature was removed without damaging ligaments or joint capsules. Spines were mounted in a customized pure‐moment spine testing jig, and data were collected using an optoelectronic motion capture system. Range of motion, neutral zone and CM in flexion/extension, left/right lateral bending and left/right axial rotation were established. Data were analyzed using mixed‐effects maximum likelihood regression models. Results: Total flexion/extension did not change across the 4 levels. There was no difference between flexion and extension, and no CM was identified. Lateral bending was not different across levels, but tended to be greater in the cranial spine. Axial rotation was ～2.6 times greater in the caudal segments. Lateral bending and axial rotation were coupled. Conclusions: Kinematics of the cranial and caudal cervical spine differed markedly with greater mobility in the caudal cervical spine.  相似文献   

7.
Objective: To report pullout force to failure at the acrylic–pin interface for variably treated 3.2 mm external skeletal fixator pins. Study Design: In vitro biomechanical evaluation. Sample Population: 3.2 mm external skeletal fixator pins in polymethylmethacrylate bars. Methods: 3.2 mm external skeletal fixator pins were used for each of 5 treatment groups: polished, unpolished, 3 notched, 5 notched, and machine knurled. Each pin was seated into a 2‐cm‐diameter acrylic connecting bar and tested in pullout force to failure. Each group consisted of 6 pins. The force required to remove the pins from the acrylic bar was measured and compared between groups. Results: Significant differences between treatment groups were determined (P<.05). Within a construct group failure mode was consistent. Fracture of the acrylic bar was only seen with knurled pin ends. Conclusions: When using 2 cm acrylic bars in external skeletal fixation (ESF), a knurled pin shaft or a pin surface with 5 notches should be considered to improve the overall stability of the ESF construct.  相似文献   

8.
The most common indications for the use of ESF in femoral fractures are closed transverse, short oblique, and minimally comminuted fractures in the central one third of the bone. External skeletal fixation is usually used in combination with IM pins and wiring techniques. During the process of open reduction and internal fixation, the surgeon should strive for accurate anatomic alignment and stability at the fracture site. The fixator is applied after the internal fixation is in place and the surgical wound is closed. The number of fixation pins placed in each fracture fragment depends on the type of fracture and the stability gained by internal fixation. Partially threaded fixation pins are recommended. They are inserted through skin stab incisions with low-speed power equipment. Recent modifications of the Type Ia fixator may increase fixator rigidity. Important postoperative concerns include exercise restriction, pin tract care, and protection of the fixator from the environment. Complications associated with ESF can be minimized by realizing its indications and limitations.  相似文献   

9.
Objective: To compare the mechanical properties and failure modes of a standardized short oblique distal radial metaphyseal osteotomy stabilized using either a transfixation pin cast (TPC), a modular‐sidebar external skeletal fixator (ESF), or a solid‐sidebar ESF (modular‐ or solid‐ESF, respectively) using static or cyclic axial loading to failure. Study Design: In vitro study. Animals: Equine cadaver forelimbs. Methods: A 30° oblique distal radial osteotomy was created and stabilized using 1 of the 3 fixation methods: (1) TPC, (2) modular‐ESF, or (3) solid‐ESF. Limbs were tested using static (TPC, modular‐ESF, and solid‐ESF) or cyclic (TPC and solid‐ESF) axial loading to failure. The stiffness, yield load, yield displacement, failure load, and failure displacement for static loading and the cycles to failure for cyclic loading at 75% failure load were obtained. Data were analyzed using a Kruskal–Wallis test. Level of significance was P<.05. Results: The solid‐ESF had a greater stiffness, higher yield and failure load and a lower yield and failure displacement than the TPC (P=.01) and the modular‐ESF (P=.02). TPC had a higher yield load, failure load, and yield displacement than the modular‐ESF (P=.01). Mean cycles to failure for TPC was 2996±657 at a load of 16,000 N and for solid‐ESF 6560±90 cycles at a load of 25,000 N. Conclusions: The solid‐ESF was stiffer and stronger than the TPC and modular‐ESF and failed at a greater number of cycles in axial loading compared with the TPC. Clinical Relevance: This study is an initial step in evaluating the solid‐ESF. Further testing needs to be performed, but this fixation may offer a viable alternative to the traditional TPC for stabilization of long bone fractures in adult horses.  相似文献   

10.
Objective: To evaluate the use of a locking compression plate (LCP) with monocortical screw purchase for stabilization of the canine cervical spine. Study Design: Experimental study. Animals: Cadaveric canine cervical spine specimens (n=7). Methods: Flexion and extension bending moments were applied to canine cadaveric specimens (C3–C6) in 4‐point bending, before and after creation of a ventral slot at C4–C5, and after fixation with a 5 hole, 3.5 mm LCP with monocortical screw placement. Screw placement and penetration into the vertebral canal were determined by radiography. Range of motion, stiffness, and energy for passive physiologic loads were determined for the C3–C4, C4–C5, and C5–C6 vertebral motion units (VMU). Monotonic failure properties were determined for cervical extension. Effects of treatments on biomechanical variables were assessed using repeated measures analysis of variance and least square means (P≤.05). Results: The ventral slot procedure increased range of motion at the treated VMU. Plate fixation decreased range of motion, increased stiffness, and decreased energy at the treated VMU. No changes were observed at adjacent VMUs. None of the screws penetrated the vertebral canal. Mean (± SD) yield bending moment of plate stabilized, slotted spines was 15.6 ± 4.6 N m. Conclusion: LCP fixation with monocortical screws stabilized the canine cervical spine.  相似文献   

11.
Objective— To report unilateral correction and initial stabilization with external skeletal fixation (ESF) of metatarsal rotation in 4 immature Bernese Mountain Dogs.
Study Design— Case series.
Animals— Bernese Mountain Dogs (n=4).
Methods— The limb deformity, including degree and origin of the deformity at the level of the proximal intertarsal joint and involvement of the central tarsal bone, was characterized by clinical and radiographic assessment. Unilateral surgical correction of the most severely affected limb was performed by disrupting the ligaments and debriding the articular cartilage of the proximal intertarsal joint to allow for derotation of the deformity and arthrodesis of the proximal intertarsal joint stabilized with either circular or linear ESF.
Results— Initial metatarsal rotation of the corrected limbs ranged from 60° to 80° of external rotation (mean, 72.5°). Three limb corrections were stabilized with circular ESF and 1 with a biplanar linear ESF. Implants were removed at the time of radiographic bony union (range, 7–10 weeks; mean, 8.6 weeks). Residual deformity was minimal, ranging from 6° to 15° (mean, 11°). Two minor complications (loosening of 1 pin, serous drainage from 1 pin) resolved with treatment.
Conclusion— Correction of rotational deformity of the pes with intertarsal arthrodesis yielded an excellent clinical outcome, with only a mild residual deformity.
Clinical Relevance— Rotational metatarsal deformities can have a significant impact on gait, ambulation, and appearance. Correction of these deformities and stabilization with ESF and intratarsal arthrodesis can yield an excellent functional outcome, with improved gait and ambulation.  相似文献   

12.
Modifications of a Type 1a external skeletal fixator (ESF) frame were evaluated by alternately placing transfixation pins on opposite sides of the connecting rod (Type 1a-MOD) or by placing additional connecting rods on either of the two inside (Type 1a-INSIDE) or two outside (Type 1a-OUTSIDE) transfixation pins. The objective of this study was to evaluate the stiffness of these modifications in terms of axial compression (AC), cranial-caudal bending (CCB), and medial-lateral bending (MLB). We hypothesized that these designs would allow significant increase in unilateral frame stiffness, over Type 1a, without proportional increase in frame complexity or technical difficulty of application. All of the ESF frames were constructed using large IMEX SKtrade mark clamps, 3.2 mm threaded fixation pins, 9.5 mm carbon fibre connecting rods and Delrin rods as bone models. Nine, eight pin frames of each design were constructed, and subjected to repetitive non-destructive loading forces (AC, CCB, MLB) using a materials testing machine. Frame construct stiffness for each force (AC, CCB, MLB) was derived from load-deformation curve analysis and displayed in N/mm. Data revealed the 1a-MOD and 1a-OUTSIDE constructs had significantly increased stiffness in CCB and AC as compared to the Type 1a constructs while all of the modified constructs were significantly stiffer in MLB than the Type 1a constructs.  相似文献   

13.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the fixation rigidity of recently developed external fixation systems (EFSs) to that of the traditional Kirschner-Ehmer (KE) system. STUDY DESIGN: In vitro biomechanical study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Five different EFSs (KE, Secur-U, small SK carbon fiber, small SK titanium, large SK carbon fiber) were assembled into 7 frame geometries to stabilize Delrin plastic rods with a 1-cm gap. METHODS: External skeletal fixation (ESF) constructs were tested in axial compression, torsion, medial-lateral bending, and cranial-caudal bending. Testing was conducted within the elastic range of each fixator. Mean stiffness in each mode was determined from the slope of the linear portion of the load-deformation curve. Comparison of stiffness values of each EFS within each loading mode and frame type was performed with 1-way analysis of variance (P <.05). RESULTS: Mean stiffness values were significantly higher for the large SK EFS in all frame types compared with KE but were equal in torsional stiffness in the double-bar type 1a frame. The small SK EFS with titanium connecting bar had greater stiffness than the KE in all modes for frame types Ia, Ia-accessory bar, and II-modified. No overall difference was detected between the KE EFS and the small SK with carbon fiber rod. The stiffness of the Secur-U type Ia frame with augmentation plate was significantly greater than the KE type Ia with accessory bar. CONCLUSIONS: The newer external fixation systems evaluated in this study provided fixation rigidity equal to or greater than that of the KE system. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: EFSs with increased frame rigidity should permit the use of less complex frame designs while providing fracture stability.  相似文献   

14.
CASE HISTORY AND CLINICAL FINDINGS: Eight feline patients with fractures of the femur, tibia or humerus were presented non-weight-bearing, with varying degrees of soft tissue and concurrent injury. Five fractures were comminuted, two were open fractures and there was one malunion. TREATMENT: Fracture repair was performed in each case using a low-cost resin-acrylic external skeletal fixator (ESF). An open, limited open, or 'open but do not touch' (OBDNT) approach allowed intra-medullary (IM) pinning of the major fragments, establishing axial alignment and countering bending stress. Application of a unilateral, uniplanar (Type IA) ESF using small diameter half-pins provided stabilisation against rotational and compressive forces. The half-pins and IM pin (tied-in) were incorporated into a composite bar with the resin-acrylic. The single humeral construct incorporated a transcondylar pin into a Type I-II design. RESULTS: Seven cats, including all five comminuted fractures, had uncomplicated fracture healing. Median time to complete removal of the construct was 7 (range 5-12) weeks. In the eighth cat, an open fracture developed into a non-union, which required revision with a plate and bone graft. This cat and six others available for follow-up (median 6 months) were reported by their owners to enjoy normal activity. Two had a mild, intermittent lameness, one had a mild but persistent lameness, and four were sound. Six out of seven owners rated the appearance of their pet's limb as normal. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The resin-acrylic ESF/tied-in IM pin construct was versatile and lightweight and allowed even highly comminuted non-load-sharing fracture configurations to be stabilised successfully using a biological strategy. Failure of the pin/acrylic interface did not occur and the frames provided sufficient strength as evidenced by healing without failure of the bar in these cases. A resin-acrylic ESF construct is inexpensive and affords the occasional orthopaedist the means to provide rotational stability when IM pinning has been used as the primary mode of fracture repair for short-oblique and transverse fractures. An extensive and costly clamp/bar inventory is not required, and there is greater flexibility for the orientation and placement of fixation pins than allowed by traditional linear bar systems.  相似文献   

15.
Five cats with femoral fractures caused by pneumatic gun shot wounds were treated using intramedullary pin/external skeletal fixation "tie-in" (IM/ESF tie-in) technique between 1997 and 2005. Clinical and radiographical examinations were used to assess bone healing, limb function recovery and complications. Clinical results as well as fracture healing were excellent in all five cats. The study showed that the IM/ESF tie-in technique can be used in cats for the treatment of comminuted femoral fractures caused by pneumatic bullets.  相似文献   

16.
  相似文献   

17.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the mechanical characteristics of a nontoxic, low-cost, rigid polymer (RP) and to compare the structural and mechanical properties of a full-frame external skeletal fixator (ESF) with either RP connecting bars, polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) connecting bars, or stainless-steel (SS) clamps and connecting bars. STUDY DESIGN: In vitro mechanical evaluation. METHODS: Mechanical properties were assessed using an in vitro bone fracture model with a bilateral uniplanar ESF (type II). Identical ESF were built with connecting bars using RP (n = 8), PMMA (n = 8), and SS connecting bars and clamps (System Meynard; n = 3). Nondestructive mechanical tests were performed in uniaxial compression (AC) and craniocaudal (CC) 4-point bending, as well as fatigue AC. Composite stiffness for each specimen and for each loading mode was calculated from 6 replicate measures using the slope of the load displacement curve at small displacements. RESULTS: RP, PMMA, and SS ESF constructs yielded mean +/- SD composite stiffness values of 227 +/- 15, 381 +/- 30, and 394 +/- 9 N/mm in AC and of 35 +/- 2, 24 +/- 2, and 15 +/- 0 N/mm in CC, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Structural and mechanical properties of RP are satisfactorily rigid and fatigue resistant for its use as a connecting bar in ESF. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: RP connecting bars in an ESF are a reliable, versatile, nontoxic and inexpensive option for the veterinary surgeon.  相似文献   

18.
Half-pin (type 1) external skeletal fixators with four, three, and two fixation pins and an intramedullary pin, and four-pin external skeletal fixators without an intramedullary pin were applied to prepared canine femurs. Load to failure, load to yield, safe load, and stiffness under compressive and torsional loads were calculated. When tested in compression, all measurements for the four-pin fixators with an intramedullary pin were significantly higher than for the two-pin fixators with an intramedullary pin. The values for all parameters except load to yield were significantly higher for the four-pin fixators with an intramedullary pin than for the four-pin fixators without an intramedullary pin. When tested in torsion, all measurements for the four-pin fixators with an intramedullary pin were significantly higher than for the two or three-pin fixators with an intramedullary pin.  相似文献   

19.
OBJECTIVES: To determine if a unilateral external skeletal fixator (ESF) with a carbon fiber connecting rod (IMEX SK) without an intramedullary (IM)-pin is mechanically comparable with a unilateral ESF with a stainless-steel connecting rod (IMEX KE) with an IM-pin. STUDY DESIGN: Finite-element method (FEM)-computer simulation. METHODS: FEM models were validated by comparison against data from mechanical testing. Three-dimensional FEM models of a femur with a mid-diaphyseal fracture with a 20 mm gap were developed with 4 unilateral external skeletal fixator devices (6-pin KE, 6-pin KE IM-pin, 6-pin SK, and 6-pin SK IM-pin). A 300 N load was applied to the femur at the proximal end in a direction of theta = 10 degrees distally and phi = 10 degrees laterally cranially. Relative displacements in x-, y- and z-directions at the gap were obtained and the overall stiffness was calculated as 300 N/total displacement. Load transfer at the pin-bone interface (PBI) was assessed by determining the von Mises stress maxima at the PBI-related nodes. RESULTS: The 6-pin SK had superior mechanical performance compared with the 6-pin KE by exhibiting smaller displacements in all directions and higher stiffness. Compared with the 6-pin KE IM-pin, the 6-pin SK (without IM-pin) was superior in craniocaudal and lateromedial displacements, but inferior in axial displacements, overall stiffness and von Mises stress maxima. The 6-pin SK IM-pin was superior to the 6-pin KE IM-pin based on smaller displacements and higher stiffness. CONCLUSIONS: Although the SK device had superior mechanical performance compared with a KE device in a unilateral configuration, the addition of an IM-pin continues to be a powerful method of enhancing mechanical performance of either IMEX SK or IMEX KE unilateral constructs in clinical cases. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Based on the results of this FEM study we recommend the use of the "tied-in" IM-pin with the ESF clinically when striving for high rigidity. In less challenging situations, a unilateral SK ESF without IM-pin might provide sufficient rigidity for a successful fracture repair.  相似文献   

20.
The purpose of this study was to determine the respective contribution of each of the following parameters to the compressive, bending, and torsional rigidity of the Kirschner-Ehmer (KE) external fixation splint as applied to canine tibiae with an osteotomy gap: bilateral versus unilateral splints; increasing the number of fixation pins; altering the diameter of fixation pins and side bars; decreasing side bar distances from the bone; increasing pin separation distances in each pin group; decreasing distances between pin groups; altering pin clamp orientation; and altering side bar conformation. Bilateral splints were 100% (mean) stiffer than unilateral splints, with stiffness enhanced to the greatest extent in mediolateral bending and torsion. Increasing pin numbers stiffened both bilateral (mean, 41%; 8 versus 4) and unilateral splints (mean, 14%; 8 versus 4). Medium KE splints were 85% (mean) stiffer than small KE splints. Decreasing side bar distances to the bone from 1.5 cm to 1.0 cm to 0.5 cm increased stiffness of both bilateral and unilateral splints by a mean of 13% to 35%. Widening pin spacing from 1.67 cm to 2.5 cm increased stiffness in craniocaudal bending only (56% increase, bilateral splints; 73% increase, unilateral splints). Decreasing the distance between pin groups from 5.84 cm to 2.5 cm increased stiffness in torsion between 23% (unilateral splints) and 45% (bilateral splints) and decreased stiffness of unilateral splints by 29% in craniocaudal bending. Altering pin clamp configuration so that the bolts of the clamp were inside the side bar rather than outside the side bar increased stiffness in axial compression only (73% increase, bilateral splints; 54% increase, unilateral splints). Conforming the lateral side bar to the tibiae increased only axial compressive stiffness by 77% but was no different than placing the clamps inside the side bars of an unconformed bilateral splint. These results quantify the relative importance of specific parameters affecting KE splint rigidity as applied to unstable fractures in the dog.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号