首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
Herbage from the first regrowth of perennial ryegrass-based swards was directly ensiled after treatment with a bacterial inoculant/enzyme preparation (SIL-ALL, Alltech UK) at 3·0 1 t?1, formic acid (850 g kg?1) at 2·59 1 t?1 or no additive (Control). The mean dry matter (DM) and water-soluble carbohydrate concentrations of the grass were 185 and 24·0 g kg?1 (fresh basis) respectively. Lactic acid concentrations after ensiling increased at a lower rate in formic acid-treated herbage than with the other treatments. All silages were well preserved and formic acid-treated silage had a lower ultimate concentration of lactic acid and higher concentration of water-soluble carbohydrate. Effluent output was increased on a proportional basis by ?0·06 with formic treatment, whereas the inoculant reduced effluent output by 0·05 in comparison with the mean effluent production of the control silage. The in vivo digestibilities of the silages were determined using sheep. The digestibilities of DM, organic matter and energy were significantly higher with inoculant-treated silage than with formic acid treatment, whereas values for the control silage were intermediate. The three silages were offered ad libitum to forty dairy cows with individual recording of daily intakes for a 10-week period in a randomized block experiment with four treatments. Sixteen animals were offered the control silage with half of these offered 3 kg concentrates per day (C3) and the other half offered 7 kg concentrates per day (C7). Twelve animals were allocated to each of the additive-treated silages, with concentrates offered at 5 kg d?1. Treatment effects on animal performance were measured in weeks 7–10. To compare animal performance for the treated silages with the control, an estimate of performance at 5 kg concentrates per day was obtained by regression using values obtained at 3 and 7 kg concentrates. In comparison with estimated silage intake for the control silage with 5 kg d?1 concentrates, inoculant and formic acid treatment of the silages increased dry matter intake by 0·04 (P > 0·05) and 0·13 (P > 0·01) respectively. In comparison with estimated milk production and yield of fat plus protein for the control treatment with 5 kg d?1 concentrates, neither inoculant treatment nor formic acid treatment produced any significant differences.  相似文献   

2.
An experiment is described in which three silages were prepared from herbage treated with either a bacterial inoculant (Ecosyl, Imperial Chemical Industries plc) at 2-71 t?1, formic acid (850 g kg?1, Add-F, BP Chemicals International Ltd.) at 2-21 t?1, or no additive (control). The herbage (second regrowth from perennial ryegrass swards), was ensiled unwilted, and had mean dry matter (DM) and water-soluble carbohydrate concentrations at ensiling of 186 and 34-1 g kg?1 respectively. The resulting silages were all well preserved and had only minor chemical differences. Thirty lactating British Friesian cows were subjected to a 21 d standardization period and were then offered the three silages for 21 d in a randomized-block design experiment. The animals were stalled individually, offered the silages ad libitum and in addition received 5 kg d?1 of a supplement containing 198 g crude protein kg DM?1. The mean silage DM intake, milk yields and milk fat concentrations during the final 7 d on treatment were 8-44, 8-62 and 887 kg d?1; 238, 230 and 25-1 kg d?1; and 368, 400 and 366 g kg?1 for the control, formic acid- and inoculant-treated silages respectively. Following the feeding trial, six cows per treatment were subdivided to provide three animals which were offered silage alone, and three offered silage plus 5 kg d-’supplement. Rumen samples taken after 21 d on these treatments indicated no effect of the inoculant on ruman volatile fatty acid proportions, whereas the use of formic acid resulted in increases in both acetate and butyrate concentrations. The results from this study support that of the earlier work that this particular inoculant, when used at ensiling, can considerably improve animal performance over that achieved with both untreated and formic acid-treated silages.  相似文献   

3.
A changeover design experiment involving thirty-six 3-month-old Friesian male calves (mean initial live weight 127 kg) was carried out to evaluate a bacterial inoculant based on a single strain of Lactobacillus plantarum (Ecosyl, ICI) as a silage additive. On 25–31 August 1988, nine silages were harvested using double-chop forage harvesters from the second regrowth of three swards, namely permanent pasture which had received 100 kg N ha?1 and perennial ryegrass which had received either 100 or 150 kg N ha?1. Herbages (mean DM and WSC concentrations 144 and 11·2 g kg?1 respectively) from each sward were treated with either no additive, formic acid (2·4 1 t?1) or the inoculant (3·3·1 t?1) and were ensiled in 126 silos of 0·8 t capacity. The only effects of the inoculant on chemical composition of the silages were a decrease in modified acid detergent fibre and an increase in endotoxin and crude and true protein concentrations. Silages were offered ad libitum and supplemented with 1·0 kg of concentrates per head daily for three periods each of 3 weeks in a partially balanced changeover design experiment. Digestibilities of the total diets were determined at the end of the experiment. For the untreated, formic acid-treated and inoculant-treated silages, silage dry matter intakes were respectively 3·58, 3·66 and 3·67 (s.e. 0·044) kg d?1, estimated metabolizable energy (ME) intakes were 46·1, 46·7 and 47·1 (s.e. 0·44) MJ d?1, energy digestibilities were 0·727, 0·727 and 0·738 (s.e. 0·0046) and organic matter digestibilities were 0·770, 0·771 and 0·788 (s.e. 0·0042). Rumen degradabilities of the silages were determined using two rumen-fistulated cows. Mean dry matter and nitrogen degradabilities for the control, formic acid-treated and inoculant-treated silages, assuming an outflow rate of 0·05 h?1, were 10·508, 0·49, 0·491 and 0·702, 0·676 and 0·729. It is concluded that the inoculant significantly increased the digestibility of the silages but did not affect dry matter or ME intake.  相似文献   

4.
Two silages were made from perennial ryegrass ensiled without wilting in 2-t capacity silos with the application of either formic acid or an enzyme mixture of cellulases and hemicellulases. Effluent losses were monitored over the ensiling period. Subsequent silage analysis showed that the enzyme-treated silage had higher concentrations of residual water soluble carbohydrate, lactic acid and acetic acid, and lower concentrations of cellulose, ADF and NDF. Effluent production was higher with the enzyme silage (formic acid, 211 1 t?1; enzyme, 2671 t?1). The silages were either offered as the sole diet or supplemented with rapeseed meal at two levels (60 or 120 g fresh weight kg?1 silage DM offered) to growing steers equipped with rumen cannulae and T-piece duodenal cannulae. Apparent whole tract digestibilities for DM, OM, N, ADF and NDF were similar for all diets although nitrogen retention (g d?1) was increased with supplementation of both silages (formic acid, 21·1; formic acid + 60 g, 23·5; formic acid+ 120 g, 28·5; enzyme, 22·6; enzyme + 60 g, 25·8; enzyme+ 120 g, 31·6). Rumen pH, ammonia and total volatile fatty acids patterns were similar. Supplementation increased the amount of organic matter apparently digested in the rumen (ADOMR) with formic acid-treated silage but not with enzyme-treated silage. Liveweight gains were similar for both unsupplemented silages (0·49 kg d?1). These increased to 0·55 and 0·65 kg d?1 for formic + 60 and formic + 120 respectively. Liveweight gains for the corresponding enzyme-treated supplemented diets were 0·81 and 0·91 kg d?1 respectively. Liveweight gains on supplemented enzyme-treated diets were significantly (P < 0·05) greater than those on formic acid-treated diets.  相似文献   

5.
This experiment evaluated a bacterial inoculant based on a single strain of Lactobacillus plantarum as a silage additive. Three silages were harvested on 8 September 1989 from the second regrowth of a perennial ryegrass sward, which had received 167 kg N, 28 kg P2O5 and 45 kg K2O ha?1. Mean dry matter (DM) and water soluble carbohydrate concentrations of the herbages at ensiling were 148 g kg?1 and 78 g.(kg DM)?1 respectively. Herbages were treated with either no additive (C), formic acid (3·0 1 t?1) (F) or the inoculant (3·0 1 t?1) (I) and were ensiled in three 80-t capacity silos. For silages C, F and I respectively, pH values were 4·70, 3·77 and 4·47, ammonia-N concentrations were 192, 111 and 182 g (kg total N)?1 and butyrate concentrations were 6·8, 1·8 and 7·1 g (kg DM)?1. The silages were offered ad libitum and supplemented with 2·0 kg concentrates per head daily to thirty-six heifers (mean initial live weight 442 kg). For silages C, F and I, silage DM intakes were 12·7, 14·4 and 14·1 (s.e. 0·42) g (kg live weight)?1, metabolizable energy intakes were 155, 166 and 172 (s.e. 5·1) kJ (kg live weight)?1, and estimated carcass gains were 456, 519 and 518 (s.e. 28·1) g d?1 respectively. A further 18 similar cattle were used in studies on the digestibility of the silages, and rumen degradation of each was estimated with three mature cattle. Inoculant treatment significantly increased crude fibre (P <0·01), neutral detergent fibre (P <0·01), modified acid detergent fibre (P <0·01), hemicellulose (P <0·05) and N digestibilities (P <0·05) and tended to increase N retention from the total diet. It is concluded that although treatment of herbage that was difficult to ensile with the inoculant did not improve silage fermentation, it significantly increased digestibility, especially of the fibre fractions, and silage DM intake and tended to increase animal performance to levels similar to those achieved with a well preserved formic acid-treated silage. Increases in silage DM and metabolizable energy intakes are likely to have been attributable to the effects of the inoculant on digestibility, especially of the fibre fractions.  相似文献   

6.
Pure perennial ryegrass or perennial ryegrass/white clover mixtures (70:30 and 40:60 on a fresh-matter basis) were ensiled in laboratory silos either untreated or alter treatment with freshly cultured Lactobacillus (Lb.) plantarun or freshly cultured Lb. plantarum plus Lactococcus (Lc.) lactis. freeze-dried Lb. plantarum or freeze-dried Lb. Plantarum plus sodium formate, sodium formate or formic acid. The effect of these additives on silage fermentation characteristics and quality of the resultant silages was examined. There were significant interactions between treatments and herbages for all silage quality parameters measured, except for acetic acid concentration. The influence of additives on the final pH of all silages was small but statistically significant. Lactic acid concentration was not directly related to herbage mixture, overall mean values ranging from 118 to 120 ± 1.5 g kg?1 dry matter (DM), but wider variation was seen between treatments for individual herbage mixtures. Acetic acid concentrations were significantly (P<0·001) affected by herbage mixture ensiled, increasing linearly as clover content increased from zero to 60%. Untreated control and formic acid-treated silages contained significantly (p<0·001) higher acetic acid concentrations than those treated with other additives. Silage ammonia N concentrations were significantly (p<0 001) influenced by herbage mixture. Lowest ammonia N concentrations (< 50 g kg?1 DM) were observed in silages that had been treated with formic acid, freshly cultured Lb. plantarum or Lb. plantarum plus Lc. lactis. The fraction 1 leaf protein (FILP) contents of silages were significantly (P <0·001) affected by both treatment and herbage mixture, with consistently and significantly higher values found in freshly cultured inoculant-treated silages. A poor correlation (r2= 0·12) existed between ammonia N and FILP in all silages. The inclusion of up to 60% white clover in the ensiled herbage did not adversely affect final silage quality. However, additive treatment markedly influenced the residual FILP content of silages, those treated with freshly cultured inoculants having the highest values.  相似文献   

7.
A randomized block experiment involving thirty-six lactating dairy cattle was carried out to evaluate a bacterial inoculant (Grazyme Grobac, Agritech), containing bacteria, enzymes and a rumen enhancer, as a silage additive. Herbage from the primary regrowth of predominantly perennial ryegrass swards was ensiled unwilted and precision-chopped after a 51-d growth interval on 4 and 5 August. Alternate loads of herbage were ensiled either untreated (C) or treated with formic acid at a rate of 2.65 1 (t herbage)?1 (F) or the inoculant at a rate of 0.64 kg (t grass)?1 (I). The treatments were harvested using the same harvester in the rotation of I, F and C treatments. Mean dry-matter (DM), water-soluble carbohydrate and nitrate nitrogen (N) concentrations and buffering capacity of the C herbages at ensiling were 198 g kg?1, 18 2 g kg?1, 290 mg (1 juice)?1 and 379 mequiv. (kg DM)?1 respectively. For silages C, F and I pH values were 3.7, 3.8 and 3.8 and ammonia N concentrations 61, 43 and 58 g (kg total N)?1 respectively. Inoculant treatment did not alter aerobic stability of the silages, whereas formic acid treatment increased it. The silages were offered ad libitum and supplemented with 5 kg of concentrates per head daily. For treatments C, F and I silage DM intakes were 10.8, 11.2 and 10.8 (s.e. 0–33) kg d?1, milk yields 21.3, 20.9 and 20.7 (s.e. 0.52) kg d?1, fat concentrations 38.3, 40.3 and 37.2 (s.e. 0.83) g kg?1 and protein concentrations 30.8, 32.6 and 32.6 (s.e. 0.49) g kg?1 respectively. Inoculant treatment did not alter (P0.05) the digestibility coefficients of the total diets, whereas formic acid treatment decreased DM (P0.05), organic matter (P0.05), neutral detergent fibre (P0.01) and hemicellulose (P0.01) digestibilities. Formic acid treatment altered rumen fermentation patterns, whereas inoculant treatment had no effect. It is concluded that, relative to a well-preserved untreated silage, additive treatment did not alter DM intake, milk yield or fat plus protein yield. However, both additive treatments increased milk protein concentrations and formic acid treatment increased milk fat concentration relative to the well-preserved, untreated silage.  相似文献   

8.
Five experiments were carried out in the years 1980-1983 and 1986 to study the effect of treating grass at ensiling with sulphuric acid (850 g kg?1) and formic acid (850 g kg?1) additives alone, and in mixtures with or without formalin on the preservation of grass, in vivo digestibility in sheep, in-silo loss, intake and performance of finishing cattle. Primary growth grass was ensiled in experiments 1 (3–4 June 1980), 2 (12-15 June 1981) and 3 (31 May-2 June 1982), primary regrowth grass in experiment 4 (1-2 August 1983) and secondary regrowth grass in experiment 5 (7-10 October 1986). During the ensiling period within each experiment, approximately 60 t of unwilted, double-chopped, additive-treated or untreated grass was packed into covered concrete-walled 60-t capacity silos. The dry matter (DM) contents of the ensiled grass in experiments 1, 2 and 5 ranged from 155-180 g kg?1 and were lower than those recorded in experiments 3 and 4 (214 g kg?1). With the exception of grass ensiled in experiment 2, where water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) contents were low, at 104 g kg?1 DM, grass in all other experiments contained relatively high WSC contents ranging from 140-154 g kg?1 DM. In experiments 1, 3 and 4 all silages were well-preserved. However, in experiment 2 the 450 g kg?1 sulphuric acid-treated and formic acid-treated silages displayed significantly lower pH, buffering capacity (Bc) and ammonia nitrogen contents than the untreated silage. In experiment 5, the sulphuric acid-treated and formic acid-treated silages displayed significantly lower pH, Bc, ammonia nitrogen, butyrate and volatile fatty acid (VFA) contents than the untreated silage. Each of the silages was offered daily with various levels of a supplementary concentrate for approximately 70-d periods to twelve animals of mixed breed in experiments 1, 3, 4 and 5 and to fifteen animals in experiment 2. All animals weighed between 380-470 kg at the start of the experiments. In experiments 1, 2 and 3 there were no significant differences between silages for any of the intake or animal performance parameters. In experiment 4, cattle fed the formic acid-treated silage displayed significantly higher silage DM intakes and daily liveweight gains than those fed the sulphuric acid-treated and untreated silages; in experiment 5, cattle fed the formic acid-treated silage displayed significantly higher silage DM intakes than those fed the untreated silage. It was concluded that formic acid was a more effective silage additive than sulphuric acid. Increasing the level of supplementation significantly decreased silage DM intakes in cattle in experiments 3 and 4, and significantly increased daily liveweight gains and daily carcass in cattle in experiments 1, 3 and 4.  相似文献   

9.
A first cut of timothy, treated with water (untreated), formic acid (FA), cellulase + lactic acid bacteria (CB), cellulase + hemicellulase (CH) or cellulase + hemicellulase + a lignin-modifying enzyme (CHL), was ensiled in pilot-scale silos. Silages, except CB, were fed to four male cattle, each equipped with a rumen and duodenal cannula, in a digestibility trial designed as a 4 × 4 Latin square. The animals were fed a diet of 400 g of concentrate and 600 g of silage at a level of 70 g DM kg?1 live weight (LW0·75). All enzyme-treated silages were well-preserved with a more extensive fermentation than in FA silage. The quality of untreated silage was poorer as indicated by higher pH and ammonia-N content. The amount of effluent from enzyme-treated silages ranged from 116 to 127 g kg?1; for FA and untreated silages values were 101 g kg?1 and 80 g kg?1, respectively. Total DM losses from enzyme-treated silages were higher than from FA silage (P < 0·05). No significant differences were noticed between silages in the apparent digestibility of organic matter (OM), neutral-detergent fibre (NDF), acid-detergent fibre (ADF) or nitrogen (N). The apparent digestibility of cellulose was higher with enzyme-treated silages than with FA silage (P < 0·05). The values for microbial N flow at the duodenum were 80·0, 91·9, 80·7 and 70·5g N d?1, and for the efficiency of rumen microbial N synthesis 38·6, 47·6, 36·9 and 32·5 g N kg?1 OM apparently digested in the rumen for untreated, FA, CH and CHL silages, respectively. In the rumen the molar proportion of propionate was higher (P < 0·01) and that of butyrate lower (P < 0·01) with enzyme-treated silages when compared with FA silage. The proportion of butyrate was also lower with untreated than with other silages (P < 0·01). The rumen residence time of NDF and ADF was longer (P < 0·05) with enzyme-treated silages than with FA silage.  相似文献   

10.
Forty‐eight high‐yielding dairy cows of the Swedish Red breed were used to examine the effects of providing pea–oat silage (P), grass–clover silage (G) and a 0·50:0·50 mixture of the silages (M) ad libitum in diets with two concentrate levels (7 or 10 kg d?1). A 9‐week experiment, including a 2‐week pre‐experimental period in which the cows were all fed the same diet, and an in vivo apparent digestibility study were conducted comparing the six dietary treatments (M7, M10, P7, P10, G7, G10). Intake and digestibility of the diets and milk production and live weight of the cows were measured. The G silage [11·3 MJ ME kg?1 dry matter (DM)] was first‐cut grass herbage wilted for 24 h prior to addition of an additive, containing formic acid, propionic acid and ammonia, at 4 L t?1 fresh matter (FM). The P forage was cut when the peas were at pod fill and ensiled directly with 6 L t?1 FM of the same additive. The main hypothesis tested, that cows fed the M silage would produce more milk than the cows fed either the P or the G silages, was confirmed. The cows fed the M7 dietary treatment had similar milk yield and milk composition to cows offered the M10, G10 and P10 dietary treatments, and cows offered the G7 and P7 dietary treatments had lower milk and milk protein yields. This suggested that a mixed ration of pea–oat bi‐crop and grass–clover silage has a concentrate‐sparing effect, and that the use of pea–oat bi‐crop and grass–clover silage as a mixed ration for high‐yielding dairy cows can be recommended.  相似文献   

11.
An experiment involving forty-five British Friesian cows in mid-late lactation was carried out to evaluate the effects of ensiling on herbage digestibility, dry-matter intake and milk production. The herbage from the primary growth of a predominantly perennial ryegrass sward that had received 123 kg N ha?1 was zero grazed (ZG) from 27 April to 24 May 1992. Before going onto the experimental diets all animals were offered a common silage as the sole diet and dry-matter intakes and milk yields were recorded. The herbage was mown, picked-up with a precision-chop harvester and offered as the sole diet, twice daily, 10 fifteen cows that were on average 176 days into lactation. On May 20 herbage from the same sward was harvested identically to the ZG herbage and ensiled, alternative loads being untreated (UT) or treated with formic acid (2.4 l?1) (FA). For silages UT and FA respectively, pH values were 3.94 and 3.92 and ammonia nitrogen concentrations were 95 and 75 [g(kg total N?1)]. Forty-two days after ensiling, the silages were fed twice daily as the sole diet to thirty cows which were on average 166 days into lactation. The feeding interval was 28 days and the last 7 days was the main recording period for each treatment. For diets ZG, UT and FA, dry-matter intakes (DMI) (kg d?1), milk yields (kg d?1), fat plus protein yields (kg d?1). milk fat concentration (g kg?1), milk protein concentration (g kg?1)and fat plus protein yields [kg (kg DMI)?1] were 12.70, 11.51 and 12.07 (Av s.e.d. = 0.458); 12.79, 10.01 and 10.18 (Av s.e.d. = 0.346); 0.900, 0.649 and 0.682 (Av s.e.d. = 0.026); 39.8, 33.7 and 36.7 (Av s.e.d. = 0.174); 32.9, 29.9 and 30.0 (Av s.e.d. = 0.83); 0.073, 0.055 and 0.055 (Av s.e.d. = 0.003). UT treatment significantly increased dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM). energy and crude fibre digestibilities and the digestible OM concentration. UT and FA compared with ZG altered rumen fermentation patterns, significantly decreasing butyrate and increasing valerate concentrations. FA treatment significantly decreased the non-glucogenic ratio. It is concluded that ensiling using formic acid had no effect on forage DMI relative to the parent fresh herbage. Ensiling either untreated or with formic acid significantly decreased milk yield and milk fat plus protein yield, resulting in a lower efficiency of conversion of DMI to milk fat plus protein.  相似文献   

12.
A randomized block design experiment involving thirty beef cattle (mean initial live weight 462 kg) was carried out to evaluate a bacterial inoculant based on a single strain of Lactobacillus plantarum as a silage additive and to provide further information in relation to its mode of action. Three herbages were harvested on 10 August 1989 using three double-chop forage harvesters from the first regrowth of a perennial ryegrass sward which had received 170 kg N, 25 kg P2O5, and 42 kg K2O ha?1. They received either no additive (silage C), formic acid at 2·91 (t grass)?1(silage F) or the inoculant at 3·21 (t grass)?1 (silage I). Mean dry-matter (DM), water-soluble carbohydrate and crude protein concentrations in the untreated herbages were 158g kg?1, 88 g (kg DM)? and 183g (kg DM)?1 respectively. For silages C, F and I respectively, pH values were 4·01, 3·57 and 3·62; ammonia N concentrations 117, 55 and 77 g (kg total N)?1; and butyrate concentrations 2·18, 0·50 and l·24g (kg DM)?1. The silages were offered ad libitum and supplemented with 2·5 kg concentrates per head daily for 77 days. For treatments C, F and I, silage DM intakes were 6·59, 7·25 and 6·80 (s.e. 0·074)kg d?1; metabolizable energy (ME) intakes 86,99 and 94 (s.e. 0·8) MJ d?1; liveweight gains 0·90, 0·97 and 1·02(s.e.0·066) kg d?1; carcass gains 541,656 and 680 (s.e. 34·0) g d?1. Inoculant treatment increased DM (P < 0·01), organic matter (P < 0·01), crude fibre (P < 0·05), neutral detergent fibre (NDF) (P < 0·05) and energy (P < 0·05) digestibilities, the digestible organic matter concentration (P < 0·01) and the ME concentration (P < 0·05) of the total diets. Additive treatment altered rumen fermentation patterns but had little effect on the rumen degradability of silage DM, modified acid detergent (MAD) fibre, NDF or hemicellulose. It is concluded that treatment with the inoculant improved silage fermentation and increased digestibility, had little effect on silage DM intake but significantly increased carcass gain to a level similar to that sustained by a well-preserved formic acid-treated silage  相似文献   

13.
Silages were prepared in late September from a mixed crop of perennial ryegrass and white clover with low dry matter and high nitrogen content. Six different treatments were used during ensiling; addition of either molassed sugar beet pulp or rolled barley, at 50 kg and 25 kg (t fresh grass)?1, formic acid at 51 t?1 and no additive (control). All silages were well fermented with low levels of ammonia and pH. The addition of rolled barley or sugar beet pulp increased the dry matter content of the silages incrementally and appeared to assist the retention of nitrogen in the silage. Dry matter intakes of silages with 50 kg of barley or sugar beet pulp tonne?1 were similar to the control silage when fed to wether sheep but at 25 kg t?1, dry matter intake increased by 0·15 with barley and 0·04 with sugar beet pulp compared to the control. The digestibility of dry matter (DM) and organic matter (OM) were significantly higher than the control for silages treated with formic acid or high levels of barley and sugar beet pulp whereas neutral-detergent fibre (NDF) digestibility did not appear to be significantly affected. All treated silages had a significantly higher metabolizable energy (ME) content than the control, and additions of barley or sugar beet increased the ME content. The ME intakes of all treated silages were also significantly greater than those of the control, and the formic acid-treated and low barley silages were the highest. This appeared to be associated with significantly higher energy digestibility and DM intake. Addition of rolled barley during ensilage resulted in greater nitrogen intake, availability and retention compared to additions of sugar beet pulp. The higher retention with barley silages was associated with a significantly lower proportional loss of absorbed nitrogen in urine, which indicated a more efficient utilization of nitrogen. These differences require further study to determine the mechanisms involved in the interactions between the energy source and herbage protein, both during fermentation and in the rumen.  相似文献   

14.
First and second harvests of lucerne (Medicago sativa L.), perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) and a lucerne–perennial ryegrass mixture [80 or 144 g kg?1 dry matter (DM) of ryegrass] at the first and second harvests were cut and conditioned, wilted to 500 or 700 g DM kg?1 then baled and stretch‐wrapped for silage on the same dates. Lucerne bales were denser (411 kg m?3) than bales of perennial ryegrass (331 kg m?3) (P < 0·05). After an 8‐month storage period, silage made from high DM‐content forage had a higher concentration of neutral‐detergent fibre (NDF) and was less digestible than that made from low DM‐content forage. Daily DM intakes by beef steers, when the silages of the second harvest were fed ad libitum, were 31·2, 31·2 and 22·3 g kg?1 live weight for lucerne, lucerne–perennial ryegrass mixture and perennial ryegrass silages, respectively (P < 0·01), when the herbage had been wilted to 500 g kg?1. In vivo digestibility of NDF in the lucerne–perennial ryegrass mixture silage (0·587) was significantly lower than that of perennial ryegrass silage (0·763) but higher than lucerne silage (0·518). Higher intakes of baled lucerne silage tended to offset its lower digestibility values. Lucerne–perennial ryegrass mixture silage had a higher DM and NDF digestibility than lucerne silage, indicating perhaps the presence of associative effects.  相似文献   

15.
An Italian ryegrass and hybrid ryegrass sward was harvested on 11 May 1994. The mean dry‐matter (DM) content of the herbage was 197 g kg–1 fresh matter (FM), and mean nitrogen and water‐soluble carbohydrate contents were 20 and 272 g kg–1 DM respectively. Approximately 72% of total nitrogen (TN) was in the form of protein‐nitrogen. The herbage was treated with either no additive, formic acid (3·3 l t–1) (Add‐F, BP) or inoculant (2·3 l t–1) (Live‐system, Genus) and ensiled in 100 t silos. Changes in effluent composition with time showed that silage fermentation and protein breakdown were delayed by treatment with formic acid. Formic acid and inoculant treatments also inhibited amino acid catabolism during ensilage. All silages were well fermented at opening with pH values < 4·0 and ammonia‐N concentrations of ≤ 50 g kg–1 TN after 120 d ensilage. Treatment had an effect on protein breakdown as measured by free amino acid concentration, with values of 21·5, 18·2 and 13·2 mol kg–1 N at opening (191 d) for untreated, formic acid‐treated and inoculated silages respectively. Amino acid catabolism occurred to the greatest extent in untreated silages with significant decreases in glutamic acid, lysine and arginine, and increases in gamma amino butyric acid and ornithine. The silages were offered ad libitum without concentrate supplementation to thirty‐six Charolais beef steers for a period of 69 d (mean live weight 401 kg). Silage dry‐matter intakes and liveweight gains were significantly (P < 0·05) higher on the treated silages. Silage dry‐matter intakes were 7·42, 8·41 and 8·23 kg d–1 (s.e.d. 0·27) with liveweight gains of 0·66, 0·94 and 0·89 kg d–1 (s.e.d. 0·058) for untreated, formic acid‐treated and inoculated silage‐fed cattle respectively. In conclusion, additives increased the intake of silage and liveweight gain by the beef steers, and it is suggested that this may be caused in part by the amino acid balance in these silages.  相似文献   

16.
A full lactation study compared the performance of autumn‐calving dairy cows of high genetic merit under two contrasting systems of milk production: high forage (HF) and high concentrate (HC). During the winter, animals on system HF were offered a silage with a high feeding value characteristics, supplemented with 5·5 kg of concentrate [crude protein content of 280 g kg?1 dry matter (DM)] through an out‐of‐parlour feeding system. From 14 March, these animals were given increasing access to grazing, achieving 24‐h turnout on 15 April. Thereafter, until day 305 of lactation, these animals were offered a large daily herbage allowance (23·0 kg grass DM cow?1, measured above a height of 4·0 cm), supplemented with 0·5 kg d?1 of a ‘high‐magnesium’ concentrate. During the winter, animals on system HC were offered a silage of medium feeding value, mixed with ≈14·0 kg of concentrate d?1 (crude protein content of 202 g kg?1 DM) in the form of a complete diet. These animals commenced grazing on 9 April, achieving 24‐h turnout on 18 April. From 18 April until 9 June, daily herbage allowances and concentrate feed levels were 17·0 kg DM and 5·0 kg respectively; thereafter, and until day 305 of lactation, these daily allowances were reduced to 15·0 kg of herbage DM and 4·0 kg of concentrate. Animal performance during the first 305 days of lactation for systems HF and HC, respectively, were as follows: total concentrate DM inputs, 842 and 2456 kg; total silage DM intakes, 2205 and 1527 kg; total grass DM intakes, 3019 and 2044 kg; total feed DM intake, 6061 and 6032 kg and total milk output, 7854 and 8640 kg. Total milk output per cow with system HF was 786 kg lower than for system HC, despite similar total DM intakes, suggesting a greater total nutrient requirement with the former to support a given milk production. However, the study confirms that relatively similar levels of animal performance can be achieved from systems based on very different sources of nutrient supply.  相似文献   

17.
Three silages were prepared from perennial ryegrass; unwilted without additive (UW), unwilted treated with 3·5 litres commercial (85%) formic acid (UWA) and prewilted without additive (WN) with dry matter (DM) concentrations of 189, 209 and 328 g kg?1 respectively. The three silages were offered ad libitum in a 348-d feeding experiment to three groups of eight Belgian white-blue bulls with an initial live weight (LW) of 277 kg. The concentrate (47 g digestible crude protein (CP) kg?1) supplementation was 7·5 g (kg LW)?1. Acid treatment (UWA) slightly improved digestibility of all silage nutrients except CP, whereas wilting generally slightly decreased digestibility of the nutrients except DM and ether extract. The daily LW gain averaged 912 g and was not significantly different on the three different treatments. DM intake per (kg LW)0.75 was higher with the UWA silage, 69·3 g, and with the WN silage, 71·6 g, than with the UW silage, 65·8 g. However, this difference in DM intake was not reflected in either daily LW or carcase gain. The DM of UW silage was more efficiently utilized than DM of UWA or WN silage.  相似文献   

18.
First-harvest direct-cut, double-chopped grass (190 and 164g DMkg?1 in Experiments 1 and 2 resptectively) was ensiled without an additive or, in Experiment 1, with 30 kg t?1 grass of an absorbent additive based on sugar beet pulp (Sweet ‘n’ Dry) or with 3·441 t?1 grass of formic acid and, in Experiment 2, with 30, 50 and 70 kg t?1 grass of Sweet ‘n’ Dry or with 50kg t?1 grass of unmolassed sugar beet pulp. The preservation and nutritive value of the silage, in-silo losses (including silage effluent production), silage intake and animal performance of adult and growing cattle were examined. In Experiment 1 all three silages were well preserved, although the formic acid-treated silage displayed significantly lower pH, ammonia nitrogen (NH3N) [g kg?1 total nitrogen (TN)] and volatile fatty acids (VFAs) than the other two silages. In Experiment 2 absorbent-treated silages displayed significantly lower pH, buffer capacity (Bc), NH3N (gkg?1 TN), CP, modified acid detergent fibre (MADF) and VFAs than untreated silage. Treatment of grass with the absorbent additives at ensiling resulted in reduced effluent production. In Experiment 1 each kilogram of Sweet ‘n’ Dry retained approximately 11 effluent, and in Experiment 2 silages made with Sweet ‘n’ Dry applied at 70kgt?1 and sugar beet pulp applied at 50 kg t?1 produced similar volumes of effluent and each kilogram of absorbent retained 1·0 and 1·31 of effluent respectively. In Experiment 1 sixty beef cattle [mean initial live weight (LW) 460 kg] were grouped according to LW and allocated to treatment at random. For untreated silage (unsupplemented or with 1 or 2 kg supplement head?1 day?1), absorbent-treated silage (unsupplemented or with 1 or 2 kg supplement head?1 day?1) and formic acid-treated silage (1 kg supplement head?1 day?1) the daily silage DM intakes were 6·12, 6·21, 6·40, 7·65, 7·45, 7·11 and 7·85 (s.e. 0·280) kg respectively, the daily liveweight gains were 0·22, 0·56, 0·81, 0·59, 0·74, 0·81 and 0·75 (s.e. 0·071) kg respectively and daily carcass gains were 0·31, 0·47, 0·67, 0·47, 0·61, 0·70 and 0·57 (s.e. 0·043) kg respectively throughout a 75-day feeding period. In Experiment 2, fifty-six growing cattle (mean initial weight 312 kg) were grouped according to LW and allocated to treatment at random. For untreated silage (unsupplemented or with 1·5 kg Sweet ‘n’ Dry or 1·5 kg commercial concentrates head?1 day?1), silage treated with Sweet ‘n’ Dry at 30, 50 and 70 kg t?1 grass and silage treated with 50kg sugar beet pulp t?1 grass the daily silage DM intakes were 5·46, 5·28, 5·33, 6·21, 6·27, 6·60 and 6·62 (s.e. 0·154) kg respectively and daily liveweight gains were 0·39, 0·75, 0·81, 0·63, 0·76, 0·94 and 1·75 (s.e. 0·052) kg respectively throughout a 122-day feeding period. In this experiment 360g kg?1 more absorbent was required when it was included at ensiling rather than offered as a supplement to untreated silage to achieve the same individual animal performance.  相似文献   

19.
Two silages were produced by harvesting grass either unwilted, using a direct cutting flail forage harvester (flail-direct), or wilted following precut-ting and being picked up using a meter-chop harvester (precision-wilted). Formic acid was applied at the rates of 2·45 and 2·9 1 t-1 for the flail-direct and precision-wilted silages, respectively. Weather conditions were difficult, both before and during harvesting with a total of 27 mm rainfall falling on the wilted herbage before ensiling. The in-silo dry matter losses were 199 and 68 g kg-1 for the flail-direct and precision-wilted silages, respectively. The resulting silages had mean particle lengths of 49 and 24 mm, dry matter contents of 186 and 276 g kg--1 and D-values of 068 and 062 for the flail-direct and precision-wilted silages, respectively. During a 141-day feeding period commencing on 19 November, the two silages were offered to 88 British Friesian cows with a mean calving date of 21 January and divided into four groups in a 2×2 factorial design experiment. The silos were divided longitudinally and two groups of cows were self-fed the silages in situ, one for each silage type, while the other two groups were easy-fed the same silages along a feed fence. There were no significant interactions between system of silage harvesting and feeding on any of the measurements of animal performance. Animals on the flail-direct silage consumed 16% less silage dry matter and produced 10% more milk per cow than those on the precision-wilted silage treatment. The overall effect was a 12% greater milk output for each unit of grass dry matter ensiled with the flail-direct than with the precision-wilted harvesting system. System of silage feeding did not significantly influence silage intake or milk output, with the mean milk yields during the final 21 days of the study being 234 and 236 kg d-1 (±0.30) for the self- and easy-feed systems, respectively. The effects of the treatments on milk composition, liveweight change, body condition score and total ration digestibility are also reported.  相似文献   

20.
Three studies were undertaken with the aim of examining in-silo losses associated with ensiling mixtures of beet pulp and herbage. In Experiment 1, first-regrowth perennial ryegrass was ensiled untreated or mixed with either 40 or 120 kg unmolassed beet pulp t?1 fresh grass prior to ensiling. In each of Experiments 2 and 3, second-regrowth ryegrass was ensiled untreated or mixed with either 40, 80 or 120 kg unmolassed beet pulp t?1 fresh grass prior to ensiling. Dry-matter concentrations of herbage ensiled in Experiments 1, 2 and 3 were 141, 157 and 139 g kg?1 respectively. Time-course studies indicated a more rapid fermentation with the untreated silages. Ensiling beet pulp with herbage resulted in significant improvements in silage fermentation, reflected in reductions in silage pH and ammonia nitrogen concentrations, with these effects being pronounced at beet pulp inclusion in excess of 80kg t?1. Beet pulp inclusion increased the dry-matter concentrations of the resulting silages while reducing crude protein, modified acid detergent fibre and gross energy concentrations. In Experiment 1 beet pulp retained 1·62 and 1·641 effluent kg?1 at the 40 and 120kg t?1 application rates respectively. In Experiments 2 and 3, effluent retentions were 1·40, 1·29 and 0·93 1 kg?1 and 2·87, 2·19 and 1·781 kg?1 at the 40, 80 and 120kg t?1 beet pulp inclusion rates respectively. In each of Experiments 1 and 3, in-silo losses were reduced with increasing level of beet pulp inclusion, while in Experiment 2 in-silo losses were relatively unaffected by treatment. Nutrient losses in effluent were reduced by the inclusion of beet pulp in all three experiments, while nutrient losses in surface waste and invisible nutrient losses tended to increase with higher levels of beet pulp inclusion. It is concluded that the inclusion of beet pulp with herbage at ensiling can result in an improved silage fermentation and a reduction in in-silo losses, while at the same time retaining considerable quantities of effluent within the silo. However, with herbage dry-matter concentrations below 160gkg?1, beet pulp inclusion in excess of 120 kg t?1 herbage would be required to eliminate effluent production totally.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号