共查询到19条相似文献，搜索用时 140 毫秒
1.
加强农药监管促进农业供给侧改革 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
本文简要阐明了开展农业供给侧改革的必要性和重要性,分析了农药生产、经营、使用和监管等方面的压力与挑战,提出了加强农药监管工作,修复生态环境,促进农业可持续发展,保障人畜安全和农产品质量安全及供给的策略。 相似文献
2.
浅析目前我国农药监管的关键点 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
本文简述了我国农药生产、经营、使用和监管等方面的现状,说明了农药在保障农产品供给等方面发挥的重大作用,分析了农药使用的风险,指出了现阶段农药监督管理的重点与难点。提出了当前农药监管＂控量、治滥、管用＂的思路。 相似文献
3.
农药是重要的农业防灾减灾物资,在我国粮食产量“九连增”中农药发挥着特殊和不可替代作用.中国是农药生产、使用大国,农药管理工作尚处于发展阶段,农药管理法规体系基本形成,农药登记评价体系逐步完善,农药监督执法体系基本形成.但也存在着监管体制尚需完善,登记制度、再评价制度、经营许可制度等管理制度急需完善,行业支持亟需加强等问题需要解决.针对这些问题,笔者提出了健全法律体系,优化监管体制;创新思路理念,完善中国特色的农药登记制度、建立符合国情的农药经营许可制度、建立适合行业发展的监测研究制度等管理制度;加强财政投入,建立基本药物补贴机制、废弃物回收处置机制,履行政府职责等发展策略,在统筹生态文明、美丽中国建设中,加快推进农药管理制度的创新和发展. 相似文献
4.
分析了南充市顺庆区农药经营、使用监管过程中的疑难问题,结合工作实际,提出了促进农药经营、使用监管的对策建议。 相似文献
5.
针对西藏农药安全使用中存在的农药产品标签和标示不规范、农药经营者推荐不对路农药和农药使用不科学等问题,提出了严格农药市场管理,加强农药使用监管,加强农药安全使用知识的宣传普及,实施有害生物综合治理工程急需完善和发展各级农技推广体系等对策,对有效地控制当地农作物有害生物为害、保障农业安全生产和保护环境、生态及人民安全具有重要意义。 相似文献
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
<正>河北省是一个农药生产、销售和使用大省,现有农药经营单位1.7万个,年销售使用农药6万吨左右,农药在防控病虫害、保障我省农业安全方面发挥着越来越重要的作用。近年来,按照农业部和省政府的部署,各级农业部门始终把加强高毒农药监管作为重点工作之一,突出"五个结合",不断强化高毒农药监管工作。以保障农业生产和农产品质量安全为目标,进一步加大农药市场整治力度,基本杜绝了甲胺磷等禁用高毒农药的销售和使用农药产品市场 相似文献
11.
我国农药残留监管与标准体系建设 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
本文分别从法律法规、监管体系、标准体系和农产品质量安全水平四个方面阐述我国农药残留监管现状,从当前研究进展、标准制定情况和国际化进程等方面明确我国标准体系建设动态。指出目前我国农药残留状况持续好转,标准体系建设势头良好的同时,我国农药残留技术法规、监管效率、标准数量、风险评估、体系协调性和国际合作交流等方面仍需进一步加强和完善。展望我国农药残留发展需立足现实,通过借鉴国际经验,以法律为依据,以标准为中心,以农产品为单元,以农药为对象,全面推进农药残留标准体系建设,保证我国农产品质量安全和国民健康诉求。 相似文献
12.
13.
农业生产过程中农药使用不当的现象普遍存在,易导致残留超标等风险。本研究利用大数据分析与人工智能技术,通过采集、清洗农药登记信息,挖掘风险指标数据,构建了农药安全使用规范数据库,并在此基础上建立了农药使用风险智能预警模型,以期降低农药使用风险,提高农产品质量安全。该模型可集成到农业生产管理系统和监管系统中,供农户和监管部门使用。当农户录入农事操作信息时,模型可根据用药记录智能识别出超范围、超剂量、超频次等不当用药操作和违反安全间隔期的采收操作,给出预警提示,将安全保障的窗口前移,从而实现产中实时预警、产后自动研判,为农业生产提供技术支撑,为监管部门提供决策参考。 相似文献
14.
农药作为重要的农用生产资料,其质量的好坏直接影响着农业生产,但我国农药质量监督检测体系发展滞后,存在许多问题,影响了我国农药质量的提高。本文重点阐述了我国农药质量监测体系的现状、存在问题并对未来发展作出了展望。 相似文献
15.
16.
17.
Thomas M Chappell Roger D Magarey Ryan W Kurtz Christina M Trexler Godshen R Pallipparambil Ernie F Hain 《Pest management science》2019,75(11):2865-2872
Several problems limit the productivity and acceptance of crop protection, including pesticide overuse, pesticide resistance, poor adoption of integrated pest management (IPM), declining funding for research and extension, and inefficiencies of scale. We discuss the proposition that alternative business models for crop protection can address these problems by incentivizing and benefiting from efficiency of pesticide use. Currently, business models are not linked to the adoption of IPM and are sometimes at odds with IPM practices. We explore a business model based on the provision of pest management adequacy through services rather than the sale of pesticide products. Specifically, we advocate for establishment of crop protection adequacy standards that would allow a market system to maximize efficiency. Changing some of the relationships between agricultural companies and producers from one based on products to one based on services is an idea worthy of debate and evaluation for improving the efficiency of pest management. Contemporary information technology enhancing monitoring and coordination warrants attention in this debate. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry 相似文献
18.
David Nuyttens Wouter Devarrewaere Pieter Verboven Dieter Foqué 《Pest management science》2013,69(5):564-575
Dressing seeds with pesticides to control pests is a widespread practice with important advantages. Recent incidents of bee losses, however, have directed attention to the emission of abraded pesticide‐coated seed particles to the environment during sowing. This phenomenon of drift of pesticide dust can lead to pesticide contamination of air, water and other natural resources in crop‐growing areas. This review article presents the state of the art of the phenomenon of dust emission and drift from pesticide seed dressing during sowing and its consequences. Firstly, pesticide seed treatment is defined and its pros and cons are set out, with the focus on dust, dust emission and dust drift from pesticide‐coated seed. The factors affecting emission of pesticide dust (e.g. seed treatment quality, seed drilling technology and environmental conditions) are considered, along with its possible effects. The measuring techniques and protocols and models currently in use for calculating the behaviour of dust are reviewed, together with their features and limitations. Finally, possible mitigation measures are discussed, such as improving the seed quality and the use of modified seed drilling technology, and an overview of regulations and stewardship activities is given. © 2013 Society of Chemical Industry 相似文献
19.
A review of pesticide policies and regulations for urban amenity areas in seven European countries 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
P KRISTOFFERSEN A M RASK A C GRUNDY† I FRANZEN‡ C KEMPENAAR§ J RAISIO¶ H SCHROEDER J SPIJKER†† A VERSCHWELE‡‡ & L ZARINA§§ 《Weed Research》2008,48(3):201-214
An analysis of the regulations of herbicide use for weed control in non-agricultural/urban amenity areas, including actual pesticide use, was carried out as a joint survey of seven European countries: Denmark, Finland, Germany, Latvia, the Netherlands, Sweden and United Kingdom. Herbicides constitute the major part of the pesticides used in urban amenity areas. Herbicide use on hard surfaces is the largest in terms of volume and potential contamination of surface and groundwater. The aim of the study was to investigate the differences in political interest and public debate on the 'use of pesticides in public urban amenity areas', regulations within each country at national, regional and local levels, possible use of alternative weed control methods and the amounts of pesticides used on urban amenity areas. A comparative analysis revealed major differences in political interest, regulations and availability of statistics on pesticide use. Denmark, Sweden, the Netherlands and Germany have, or have had, a strong public and political interest for reducing the use of herbicides to control weeds in urban amenity areas and also have very strict regulations. The UK is currently undergoing a period of increasing awareness and strengthening regulation, while Latvia and Finland do not have specific regulations for weed control in urban amenity areas or on hard surfaces. Statistics on pesticide/herbicide use on urban amenity areas were only available in Denmark and the Netherlands. Developing this kind of information base reveals the differences in herbicide use, regulations and policies in European countries and may enhance the transfer of knowledge on sustainable weed control across countries. 相似文献