共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 55 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
8月7日-9日,为期3天的"第十四届国际谷物科技与面包大会暨国际油料与油脂科技发展论坛"在北京国际会议中心召开。国际谷物科技协会主席玛丽娜女士、中国国家粮食局任正晓局长、中国科学技术协会党组成员、学会学术部沈爱民部长等出席会议并作了重要讲话。大会由中国粮油学会和国际谷物科技协会共同举办,中国粮油学会朱长国理事长主持,来自世界36个国家和地区,130多名国外专家学者,450多名国内粮油科技工作者,约600人参加了会议。 相似文献
4.
5.
6.
7.
《农业机械》2011,(11):24
我国举办的高规格、大规模《"全谷物"食品发展国际论坛》于4月20日在北京隆重开幕。论坛由国家发改委公众营养与发展中心、(国际)全谷物委员会、(国际)健康谷物基金会、中国粮油学会粮油营养分会共同主办。来自世界各国的全谷物食品顶尖专家、国内外著名企业、政府各部门有关领导、行业组织负责人等200位代表参加了论坛。全谷物食品是一大类健康谷物食品,近年来在国际上发展迅速。美国谷物化学家协会将全谷物定义为:完整、碾碎、破碎或压片的颖果,基本的组成包括淀粉质胚乳、胚芽与麸皮,各组成部分的相对比例与完整颖果一样。全谷物富含膳食纤维、维生素、矿物元素及酚类化合物、类胡萝卜素、维生素E、木酚素、β-葡聚糖、菊粉、抗性淀粉、植物甾醇与植酸等植物化学素。 相似文献
8.
2010年10月14日上午9点,由国家粮食局和浙江省人民政府共同主办的第10届中国国际粮油产品及设备技术展览会在浙江省宁波市国际展览馆隆重开幕。会议秉承了10年来规模最大、产业链条最完整、影响广泛的传统,设立1～4号馆,展出总面积超过2000m2,吸引了来自国内28个省(区、市)以及意大利、瑞士、英国、巴西等国家和地区的700余家粮油粮机企业参展。据悉,2010～2012年,中国国际粮油产品及设备技术展览会将在宁波连办3届,2010年是展会移师宁波的第1年。 相似文献
9.
3月13日,由中国粮油学会、山东省粮食局、德州市人民政府主办,中国粮油学会粮油营销技术分会、中国粮油发展网、德州市粮食局、德州市粮食产业化协会承办的,中国粮食行业权威品牌展会"2013年全国粮油产销企业(春季)订货会暨全国粮油经销商联谊会"在山东德州太阳谷博览馆隆重开幕,并于3月14号在德州太阳谷博览馆圆满落下帷幕。 相似文献
10.
11.
针对化探样品批量大,元素多,检出限低等特点,采用水平电极撒料法,对化探样中多种微量元素进行了光谱定量分析.将样品与缓冲剂1:1混匀,采用W-100光栅摄谱仪(光栅刻线1200条/毫米,二级光谱)进行水平撒样摄谱,谱板经暗室处理后,在东德GFE760μ测微光度计上用P标尺测光,以△P-logc绘制工作曲线,查出含量.本法采用了特制的撒样漏斗,改善了下料的均匀性,提高了分析精度;以Ge和Pd作内标消除工作条件变化对谱线强度的影响;同时还试选了SiO2:C:Na2SO4＝61:30:9的混合物作缓冲剂,提高了弧烧的稳定性,获得了较高的再现性.本文还采用了一种单元素线减光器对Ag3382.9进行减光,使Ag的测定上限由5×10-6提高到30×10-6.本法操作简便快速,成本较低,一次可测定Ag、W、Mo、Sn、Bi、Cu、Pb、Zn、Ni、Co、Cr等多种元素,检出限为Ag 0.03×10-6,W 0.5×10-6,Mo0.05×10-6,Sn 0.4×10-6,Pb 1×10-6,Zn 3×10-6,Cu 0.5×10-6,Bi 0.1×10-6,Ni 0.3×10-6,Co 0.3×10-6,Cr 1×10-6,基本上达到了化探普查找矿定量分析的要求. 相似文献
12.
为了快速、准确地检测土壤中多种重金属元素,建立一种王水消解同时测定土壤中Cu,Zn,Ni,Cr,Pb,Cd的方法.选取8种具有广泛代表性的土壤标准物质对王水消解法进行考察,结合土壤标准物质标准值,通过大量试验数据对该方法做出全面评价. 相似文献
13.
14.
砀山县丰产农机服务专业合作社位于安徽省宿州市砀山县朱楼镇朱楼村,成立于2015年5月13日。合作社目前占地1.33 hm^2(20余亩),拥有成员200余人,拖拉机40多台,收割机18台,灌溉机械14套,植保飞机80多架,烘干机6组,配套农具230多台(套),机械资产达到1 200余万元。 相似文献
15.
16.
J. R. Philip 《Irrigation Science》1987,8(2):101-114
Summary We study the effect of surface resistance r (whether of monolayers on free water or plant diffusive resistance) on evaporation rate, energy balance, and microclimate, under advective conditions. We use power-law representations of the vertical profiles of mean windspeed and eddy diffusivity, and exploit two known similarity solutions, one for a step-function change of surface concentration, and the other for a step-function change of surface flux density. To a very close approximation, these two contrasting canonical advective problems yield the same (spatially variable) boundary layer transfer coefficient expressing the ratio of the surface flux perturbation to the surface concentration perturbation. Adopting this coefficient reduces the (spatially variable) surface energy balance for the advective boundary layer with surface resistance to a quadratic equation, with the solution yielding the fetch distances x at which the surface temperature assumes a given value To. With To (x) established thus, the other significant properties of the boundary layer follow simply and directly.The results reveal the profound influence of r, especially at small x. As boundary layer atmospheric resistance increases with x, r becomes relatively less important. It can be regarded as primarily reducing advective effects. Antievaporation films thus work best on small water surfaces in arid surroundings, but are less effective the larger the water body and the moister the surrounds. If leaf temperatures are not limiting, increasing r has greatest effect for small vegetated areas in an arid environment, but may not be optimal for extensive continuous monocultures. Control of surface resistance offers means of manipulating microclimate, for example when arid landscapes are watered for this purpose. The exploratory nature of this investigation, and its many limitations, are stressed. 相似文献
17.
E. Owen 《Agricultural Systems》1983,11(1):66
18.
19.
《Agricultural Systems》2002,74(1):141-177
FARMSCAPE (Farmers', Advisers', Researchers', Monitoring, Simulation, Communication And Performance Evaluation) is a program of participatory research with the farming community of northeast Australia. It initially involved research to explore whether farmers and their advisers could gain benefit from tools such as soil characterisation and sampling, climate forecasts and, in particular, simulation modelling. Its current focus is facilitating the implementation of commercial delivery systems for these same tools in order to meet industry demand for their access. This paper presents the story of what was done over the past decade, it provides performance indicators of impact, it reflects on what was learnt over this period and it outlines where this research is likely to head in the future.Over the past 10 years, the FARMSCAPE team employed a Participatory Action Research approach to explore whether farmers could value simulation as a decision support tool for managing their farming system and if so, could it be delivered cost-effectively. Through farmer group engagement, on-farm trials, soil characterisation, monitoring of crops, soils and climate, and sessions to apply the APSIM systems simulator, FARMSCAPE represented a research program on decision support intervention. Initial scepticism by farmers and commercial consultants about the value of APSIM was addressed by testing its performance both against measured data from on-farm trials and against farmers' experiences with past commercial crops. Once this credibility check was passed, simulation sessions usually evolved into participants interactively inquiring of the model the consequence of alternative management options. These ‘What if’ questions using APSIM were contextualised using local climate and soil data and the farmer's actual or proposed management rules.The active participation of farmers and their advisers, and working in the context of their own farming operations, were the key ingredients in the design, implementation and interpretation of the FARMSCAPE approach to decision support. The attraction of the APSIM systems simulator to farmers contemplating change was that it allowed them to explore their own system in a manner equivalent to learning from experience. To achieve this, APSIM had to be credible and flexible. While direct engagement of farmers initially enabled only a limited number of beneficiaries, this approach generated a commercial market for timely and high quality interactions based on soil monitoring and simulation amongst a significant sector of the farming community. Current efforts are therefore focused on the training, support and accreditation of commercial agronomists in the application of the FARMSCAPE approach and tools.The FARMSCAPE approach to decision support has come to represent an approach to guiding science-based engagement with farm decision making which is being tested nationally and internationally. 相似文献