共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 671 毫秒
1.
《EPPO Bulletin》2017,47(3):384-400
Specific scope
This Standard describes a diagnostic protocol for Aphelenchoides besseyi. This Standard should be used in conjunction with PM 7/76 Use of EPPO diagnostic protocols. Terms used are those in the EPPO Pictorial Glossary of Morphological Terms in Nematology a .Specific approval and amendment
Approved in 2003‐09. Revised in 2017‐04. This revision was prepared on the basis of the IPPC Diagnostic Protocol adopted in 2016 on Aphelenchoides besseyi, Aphelenchoides fragariae and Aphelenchoides ritzemabosi (Annex 17 to ISPM 27; IPPC, 2016 ). The EPPO Diagnostic Protocol only covers A. besseyi. It differs in terms of format but it is consistent with the content of the IPPC Standard for morphological identification for this species. With regard to molecular methods, one real‐time PCR test available in the region is included as well as DNA barcoding. 相似文献2.
《EPPO Bulletin》2017,47(3):401-419
Specific scope
This Standard describes a diagnostic protocol for Ditylenchus destructor and Ditylenchus dipsaci. 1 This Standard should be used in conjunction with PM 7/76 Use of EPPO diagnostic protocols. Terms used are those in the EPPO Pictorial Glossary of Morphological Terms in Nematology. 2Specific approval and amendment
Approved in 2008‐09. This revision was prepared on the basis of the IPPC Diagnostic Protocol adopted in 2015 on D. dipsaci and D. destructor (Annex 8 to ISPM 27 Diagnostic protocols for regulated pests). The EPPO Diagnostic Protocol is consistent with the text of the IPPC Standard for morphological identification for this species. For comparison with other species the IPPC table includes Ditylenchus africanus whereas the EPPO table includes Ditylenchus convallariae due to the different distribution of the species. The molecular tests for which there is experience in the EPPO region are described in full in the appendices (some of these are additional tests to those in the IPPC protocol). Reference is given to the IPPC protocol for tests for which there is little experience in the EPPO region. DNA barcoding is also included. Revision approved in 2017‐04. 相似文献3.
《EPPO Bulletin》2017,47(2):198-210
Specific scope
This Standard describes a diagnostic protocol for Xiphinema americanum sensu lato 1 . This Standard should be used in conjunction with PM 7/76 Use of EPPO diagnostic protocols. Terms used are those in the EPPO Pictorial Glossary of Morphological Terms in Nematology 2 .Specific approval and amendment
Approved in 2009‐09. Revised in 2017‐01. This revision was prepared on the basis of the IPPC Diagnostic Protocol adopted in 2016 (Annex 11 to ISPM 27, IPPC, 2016). This EPPO Diagnostic Standard differs in terms of format but it is consistent with the content of the IPPC Standard. However, since the adoption of the IPPC Protocol 5 new species have been added into the group and are included in this version of the EPPO Protocol. 相似文献4.
Tilletia indica Mitra is a fungal pathogen causing Karnal bunt of wheat. Tilletia indica is a quarantine pest in many countries worldwide. In the European Union, imported wheat grain from countries where the fungus is present must be checked for the presence of T. indica teliospores. The inspection services at the borders need rapid, sensitive and reliable detection tests to identify T. indica spores on wheat grain. In this work, validation was carried out according to EPPO Standard PM 7/98 to evaluate the multiplex real‐time PCR test described in ISPM 27 Diagnostic Protocol for regulated pests (Annex 4 Tilletia indica Mitra) by means of a test performance study with nine participating laboratories, and the performance characteristics of the test were established. The original protocol was modified with regard to the extraction of DNA from the pellet obtained from the ‘washing test’ and the enrichment PCR step in order to increase the amount of template DNA for the real‐time PCR. The optimized test still has five teliospores as the limit of detection for the contaminated pellet but has an increased analytical sensitivity and had positive results with three teliospores in 93% of cases instead of 43% for the original test. The two closest Tilletia species, Tilletia horrida and Tilletia walkeri, were used to evaluate analytical specificity (exclusivity) and no cross‐reactions were obtained. Diagnostic sensitivity, diagnostic specificity, accordance and concordance were also evaluated. 相似文献
5.
《EPPO Bulletin》2017,47(2):174-197
Specific scope
This Standard describes a diagnostic protocol for Globodera rostochiensis and Globodera pallida. 1 Terms used are those in the EPPO Pictorial Glossary of Morphological Terms in Nematology. 2 This Standard should be used in conjunction with PM 7/76 Use of EPPO diagnostic protocols.Specific approval and amendment
Approved as an EPPO Standard in 2003‐09. Revisions approved in 2009‐09, 2012‐09 and 2017‐02. 相似文献6.
《EPPO Bulletin》2017,47(2):135-145
Specific scope
This Standard describes a diagnostic protocol for Tobacco ringspot virus 1 This Standard should be used in conjunction with PM 7/76 Use of EPPO diagnostic protocols.Specific approval and amendment
First approved in 2000‐09. Revision approved in 2017‐03 相似文献7.
《EPPO Bulletin》2017,47(3):420-440
Specific scope
This Standard describes a diagnostic protocol for Synchytrium endobioticum. 1 This Standard should be used in conjunction with PM 7/76 Use of EPPO diagnostic protocols.Specific approval and amendment
Approved in 2003‐09. Revision approved in 2017‐06. 相似文献8.
《EPPO Bulletin》2018,48(2):175-218
Specific scope
This Standard describes a diagnostic protocol for Xylella fastidiosa. 1 It should be used in conjunction with PM 7/76 Use of EPPO diagnostic protocols.Specific approval and amendment
First approved in 2004‐09. Revised in 2016‐09 and 2018‐04. 2 相似文献9.
《EPPO Bulletin》2012,42(3):382-393
Specific scope
This standard, intended for use in association with EPPO Standards PP 1 Efficacy evaluation of plant protection products, describes the conduct and reporting of efficacy evaluation trials.Specific approval and amendment
First approved in 1992‐09. First revision approved in 1996‐09. Second revision approved in 2003‐09. Revision mainly to reflect zonal assessment approved in 2012‐09. 相似文献10.
《EPPO Bulletin》2016,46(3):429-443
Specific scope
This Standard describes a diagnostic protocol for Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. allii. 1 This Standard should be used in conjunction with PM 7/76 Use of EPPO diagnostic protocols.Specific approval and amendment
First approved in 2016‐09. 相似文献11.
《EPPO Bulletin》2017,47(3):330-332
Specific scope
This Standard describes the conduct of trials for the efficacy evaluation of foliar insecticides against Ceratitis capitata on citrus and top fruits. For bait spray application see EPPO Standard PP 1/301. Together they replace EPPO Standard PP 1/106 Ceratitis capitata.Specific approval and amendment
First approved in 2017‐09. 相似文献12.
《EPPO Bulletin》2018,48(1):64-77
Specific scope
This Standard describes a diagnostic protocol for Heterodera glycines. 1 This Standard should be used in conjunction with PM 7/76 Use of EPPO diagnostic protocols. Terms used are those in the EPPO Pictorial Glossary of Morphological Terms in Nematology. 2Specific approval and amendment
Approved in 2008–09. Revision approved in 2017–11. 相似文献13.
《EPPO Bulletin》2017,47(3):445-451
Specific scope
The purpose of the EPPO Standard on Castanea is to recommend to EPPO Member Governments the phytosanitary measures which they should use or require for Castanea plants and plant products moving in international trade to prevent the introduction and spread of quarantine pests. Some of these recommendations are addressed to all EPPO Member Governments, others are addressed only to countries considered to face a certain level of risk from the introduction and spread of the regulated pests concerned. All these recommendations were derived from:- EPPO Standards PM 1/2 (EPPO A1 and A2 Lists) and the former EPPO Standards PM 2 (pest‐specific phytosanitary measures), or
- Pest Risk Analysis (PRA) carried out or reviewed by EPPO, or
- the Working Party on Phytosanitary Regulations.
Specific approval and amendment
First approved in 2010‐09 as PM 8/3 Quercus and Castanea. Revised and approved as a separate Standard PM 8/4 in 2017‐09 相似文献14.
《EPPO Bulletin》2017,47(3):452-460
Specific scope
The purpose of the EPPO Standard on Quercus is to recommend to EPPO Member Governments the phytosanitary measures which they should use or require for Quercus plants and plant products moving in international trade to prevent the introduction and spread of quarantine pests. Some of these recommendations are addressed to all EPPO Member Governments, others are addressed only to countries considered to face a certain level of risk from the introduction and spread of the regulated pests concerned. All these recommendations were derived from:- EPPO Standards PM 1/2 (EPPO A1 and A2 lists) and the former EPPO Standards PM 2 (pest‐specific phytosanitary measures), or
- Pest Risk Analysis (PRA) carried out or reviewed by EPPO, or
- the Working Party on Phytosanitary Regulations.
Specific approval and amendment
First approved in 2010‐09 as PM 8/3 Quercus and Castanea. Revised and approved as a separate Standard PM 8/5 in 2017‐09 相似文献15.
《EPPO Bulletin》2009,39(3):354-368
Specific scope
This standard describes a diagnostic protocol for Globodera rostochiensis and Globodera pallida 1 1 Use of brand names of chemicals or equipment in these EPPO Standards implies no approval of them to the exclusion of others that may also be suitable..
Specific approval and amendment
This Standard was developed under the EU DIAGPRO Project (SMT 4‐CT98‐2252) by partnership of contractor laboratories and intercomparison laboratories in European countries. Approved as an EPPO Standard in 2003–09. Revision approved in 2009–09.16.
《EPPO Bulletin》2017,47(3):349-365
Specific scope
This Standard describes the procedure for inspection of places of production of Fragaria plants for planting. The Standard includes relevant sampling procedures. The Standard focuses on pests of concern for the EPPO region which are present in the EPPO region. The purposes of a place of production inspection may be for export or for internal ‘within country’ use. Alternatively, inspection may be carried out as part of a national survey for monitoring or to determine country or area freedom for specified pests. The Standard also provides guidance which may be relevant to exports to non‐EPPO countries, in which case the pest lists and requirements for the importing country should be consulted. A procedure for inspecting imported plants from outside the EPPO region is covered in EPPO Standard PM 3/73 Consignment inspection of Fragaria plants for planting (EPPO, 2008).Specific approval
This Standard was first approved in 2017‐09. 相似文献17.
《EPPO Bulletin》2012,42(3):367-381
Specific scope
This standard is intended for use in association with EPPO Standards of set PP 1 Standards for the efficacy evaluation of plant protection products and provides detailed advice on the design and analysis of efficacy evaluation trials.Specific approval and amendment
First approved in 1989–09. First revision approved in 1998–09. Second revision approved in 2006–09. Revision mainly to reflect zonal assessment approved in 2012–09. 相似文献18.
《EPPO Bulletin》2017,47(2):164-173
Specific scope
This Standard describes a diagnostic protocol for Diabrotica virgifera virgifera. This Standard should be used in conjunction with PM 7/76 Use of EPPO diagnostic protocols.Specific approval and amendment
Approved in 2003‐09. Revised in 2017‐02. 相似文献19.
20.
《EPPO Bulletin》2013,43(1):105-118