共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 38 毫秒
1.
Christopher Parker 《Pest management science》1983,14(1):40-48
The history of herbicide antidotes is reviewed, beginning with the exploration of compounds to protect wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) against barban in the early 1960s, and the later introduction of naphthalic anhydride (NA, naphthalene-1, 8-dicarboxy-licanhydride) as a seed dressing for protecting maize (Zea mays L.) against EPTC. This compound was largely replaced by Stauffer's R-25788 (N, N-diallyl-2, 2-dichloroacetamide) which has continued to be widely used in conjunction with EPTC and butylate in maize. This compound is highly specific to maize and can thus be applied in admixture with the herbicide, but has not proved of practical value on other crop species. NA on the other hand is less specific and is of potential value on sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] and rice (Oryza sativa L.); experimental work continues on these crops. The only other antidote to be marketed so far is cyometrinil as a seed dressing for protecting sorghum against metolachlor and related herbicides. Other compounds are under development. Mode of action and structure-activity relations are discussed, as well as the current and future potential for antidotes in respect of the control of weed species in closely related crops, the increased options for herbicide use in minor crops and the possibility of reduced costs for broad spectrum weed control in major crops. 相似文献
2.
A pot bioassay procedure, based on root growth of pre-germinated maize was used to study residual phytotoxicity of chlorsulfuron and DPX-L5300 methyl-([4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl(methyl) carbamoyl]sulphamoyl)benzoate under field conditions. The results indicate that residual bioactivity of both herbicides, applied either pre-or post-emergence at 5, 10, 20 and 40 g a.i. ha?1, was increased with increasing rate of application. Chlorsulfuron persisted longer than DPX-L5300, and both herbicides, when applied pre-emergence, persisted longer than when applied post-emergence. Pot bioassay did not detect any residues eight months after either application. Maize and sunflower, planted as rotational field crops eight months after pre-emergence application, were not injured by either herbicide. Also, these crops were not affected when planted four months after post-emergence application of any of the DPX-L5300 rates or 5 or 10 g a.i. ha?1 of chlorsulfuron, but their fresh weight was significantly reduced where 20 or 40 g a.i. ha?1 of chlorsulfuron were applied. 相似文献
3.
基于活性亚结构拼接方法,在氯磺隆分子中苯环的5位引入不同磺酰氨基,设计合成了4个氯磺隆衍生物 ( H01 ~ H04 ),其结构经核磁共振氢谱(1H NMR)、碳谱(13C NMR)和高分辨质谱(HRMS)确证。初步的生物活性测试结果表明,目标化合物在有效成分150 g/hm2测试浓度下表现出较好的除草活性,其中:苗前处理时, H01 、 H02 及 H04 对油菜生长的抑制率均高于85%, H01 对反枝苋的抑制率为100%,优于对照药剂氯磺隆 (68.8%);苗后处理时, H04 对油菜和反枝苋的抑制率均与氯磺隆相当,对稗草的抑制率 (85.2%) 优于对照药剂氯磺隆 (68.8%)。安全性测试结果表明,目标化合物对小麦和玉米生长的抑制率均低于氯磺隆。苗前处理时, H01 和 H04 对小麦安全, H01 ~ H04 对玉米的抑制率均低于氯磺隆;苗后处理时, H01 ~ H04 对玉米生长无抑制作用。降解试验结果表明, H01 ~ H04 在碱性土壤 (pH 8.39) 中的降解半衰期为44.43~53.32 d,比氯磺隆的半衰期 (157.53 d) 明显缩短。研究结果表明, H01 和 H04 可作为潜在的小麦田和玉米田磺酰脲类除草剂候选药物。本文可为进一步设计具有高效除草活性、降解速率快以及作物安全性高的新型磺酰脲类除草剂提供参考。 相似文献
4.
Laboratory experiments were conducted to compare the physiological effects of two herbicides: fluazifop-butyl {butyl ( RS )-2-[4-(5-trifluoromethyl-2-pyridyloxy)phenoxy]-propionate} and sethoxydim {(±)-2-[1-(ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-one} on oat ( Avena sativa L. cv. Zenshin). The herbicides strongly inhibited growth of oat and induced chlorosis at the basal part of shoots and ethylene production from the seedlings. The phytotoxicity of these herbicides in oat seedlings was alleviated by 2,4-D (2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid), but not by IAA (indole-3-acetic acid). Coleoptile elongation induced by 2,4-D or IAA was inhibited by fluazifop-butyl and sethoxydim, suggesting both herbicides possess the activity to inhibit this auxin action. Fluazifop (free acid) and sethoxydim inhibited proton excretion from oat roots but fluazifop-butyl did not. This proton excretion was not restored by 2,4-D or IAA. Furthermore, cellular electrolyte leakage in oat shoots was increased by both herbicides, indicating that the membrane permeability was increased. We conclude that fluazifop-butyl and sethoxydim may have the same mechanism of action which leads to disruption of membrane integrity, although fluazifop-butyl acts as a free acid after hydrolysis (fluazifop). 相似文献
5.
The herbicide safener N-dichloroacetyl-1-oxa-4-aza-spiro-4,5-decane (AD-67) is of similar efficiency as the extensively used N.N-diallyl-2,2-dichloroacetamide (R-25788) and the structurally related 3-(dichloroacetyl)-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-oxa-zolidine (AD-2) in reducing EPTC [S-ethyl-N,N-dipropyl (thiocarhamate)] injury to maize (Zea mays L. cv. KSC 360). EPTC treatment produces growth retardation and deformities and inhibits CO2 fixation. It does not reduce epicuticular lipids appreciably but affects wax arrangement on the leaf surface. When EPTC is applied together with one of these safeners, these injuries are not observed. All three safeners act similarly. Each prevents the herbicide-induced aggregation of epicuticular wax of maize, thereby protecting the plants against the formation of areas where the underlying cuticle layers are exposed and increase in transpiration. 相似文献
6.
Abdurrahman Saghir 《国际虫害防治杂志》2013,59(1):106-107
Abstract Twenty-seven different herbicides were tested at the AUB Agricultural Research and Education Center in the Beqa'a, Lebanon, to determine their effects on weeds in wheat, barley, maize, onion and sugar beet. Each herbicide was tested at three different rates as pre-emergence and post-emergence applications. Unweeded and hand-weeded check plots were included. Data on yield, quality and other agronomic characteristics of the crops tested were recorded. Concentrations of 1,000 and 10,000 ppm of 2, 4–D caused a significant decrease in the height and grain yield of wheat and barley when sprayed at the 3-leaf stage. At the 5-leaf stage, injury to wheat and barley occurred only when sprayed at 10,000 ppm, whereas an increase in the grain yield was obtained at 1,000 ppm of 2, 4–D acid equivalent (1 kg a.i./ha). Pre-emergence treatments of atrazine and simazine at 2.5 kg a.i./ha caused a significant increase in the forage and grain yields of maize as compared to unweeded check plots. Wheat, oats, vetch and sugar beet were injured when planted after triazine-treated maize, whereas onions and soyabeans were tolerant. Other promising herbicides tested on maize were C 3095 (N–3–trifluoromethylphenyl–N'–methyl–N'–methoxyurea) and BV– 201 (1–(3′, 4′–dichlorophenyl)–3–methylpyrrolidin–2–one) applied as a pre-emergence spray at 1 and 2 kg/ha respectively. Pre-planting treatment of EPTC and pre-emergence treatment of pebulate at 2 kg/ha gave a slight increase in the yield of roots of sugar beet. BV–201 and BV–207 (1–(3–chloro–4–methylphenyl)–3–methylpyrrolidin–2–one) were phytotoxic to beet. In onions, nitrofen, BV–201 and BV–207 at 1–2 kg/ha were promising as pre-emergence and post-emergence sprays. DNOC and dinoseb at 1.5 kg/ha and ioxynil at 0.5 kg/ha sprayed post-emergence increased the yield of onions significantly over the check. No significant effects of these herbicides were observed on the bulb index, moisture content and total soluble solids of onions. 相似文献
7.
《Pesticide biochemistry and physiology》1987,29(1):66-76
The effects of the herbicide antidotes CGA-92194 (α-[(1,3-dioxolan-2-yl-methoxy)-imino]benzeneacetonitrile), flurazole [phenylmethyl 2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)-5-thiazolecarboxylate], dichlormid (2,2-dichloro-N,N-di-2-propenylacetamide), and naphthalic anhydride (1H,3H-naphtho(1,8-cd)-pyran-1,3-dione) on nonprotein thiol content, glutathione content, and glutathione S-transferase (GST) activity in etiolated sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) Moench) shoots were examined. CGA-92194 and naphthalic anhydride had no effect on nonprotein thiol or reduced glutathione (GSH) content of sorghum shoots. In contrast, dichlormid and flurazole increased nonprotein thiol content of sorghum shoots by 24 and 48%, respectively. These increases were largely attributable to an increase in GSH. The antidotes increased GST activity less than twofold when using CDNB (1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene) as a substrate. In contrast, when using metolachlor [2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)acetamide] as a substrate, the increase in GST activity in response to antidote treatment was much greater: flurazole (30-fold), CGA-92194 (20-fold), naphthalic anhydride (17-fold), dichlormid (5-fold). The degree of protection from metolachlor injury conferred by a particular antidote was strongly correlated (R2 = 0.95) with its ability to enhance GST activity, as evaluated with metolachlor as substrate. A comparison of GST activity in untreated and CGA-92194-treated seedlings, over a range of metolachlor concentrations (0.5–500 μM), indicated that the relative enhancement of enzyme activity by CGA-92194 was greater at lower metolachlor concentrations. The rate of nonenzymatic conjugation of metolachlor and GSH in vitro was much less (on a gram fresh weight equivalent basis) than the enzymatic rate. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the above antidotes protect sorghum by enhancing GST activity which results in accelerated detoxification of metolachlor via GSH conjugation. 相似文献
8.
Separate field experiments were conducted to evaluate Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. (johnson-grass) control with foliar-applied herbicides in soyabeans (Glycine max (L.) Merr. cv. Williams) grown in tilled (mould board plough) or no-tillage fields. Fluazifop-butyl, sethoxydim, CGA-82725 and mefluidide were applied post-emergence to 45-cm high S. halepense and glyphosate was applied with a wick bar to 90-cm high S. halepense in the conventional and no-tillage studies. HOE-00581 {ethyl 2-[4-[(6-chloro-2-benzoazolyl)oxyl]-phenoxy]propanoate} was applied to 45-cm high S. halepense only in the no-tillage studies. Fluazifop-butyl, sethoxydim, CGA-82725, HOE-00581 (no-tillage only) and glyphosate provided good control of S. halepense in conventional and no-tillage soyabeans and generally increased soyabean yields compared to weedy controls, when low precipitation was not limiting yields. Mefluidide at 0.3 kg ai ha?1 provided the least S. halepense control in the conventional and no-tillage studies. The studies were not designed to compare S. halepense control in the two tillage systems; however, these data show that tillage to disrupt S. halepense rhizomes was not required to obtain good control of S. halepense with foliar applications of fluazifop-butyl, sethoxydim, CGA-82725, HOE-00581 and glyphosate. La lutte contre Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. utilisant des herbicides foliaires dans le soja en culture classique et en non-culture Plusieurs essais ont été installés sur le terrain dans le but d'évaluer des herbicides foliaires pour la destruction de Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. dans le soja (Glycine max (L.) Merr. var. Williams) cultivé en terre labourée et en non-culture. Le fluazifop-butyle, le séthoxydime, le CGA-82725 et le méfluidide ont été appliqués en postlevée sur S. halepense haut de 45 cm et le glyphosate a été appliqué sur S. halepense haut de 90 cm, utilisant un frotteur, dans les deux sytèmes de culture. HOE-00581 (éthyle 2-[4-[(6-chloro-2-benzoazolyl)oxyl]phénoxy]propanoate) a été appliqué sur S. halepense haut de 45 cm uniquement dans les systèmes de·non-culture. Le fluazifop-butyle, le séthoxydime, le CGA-82725, le HOE-00581 et le glyphosate ont bien maitriséS. halepense dans les deux systèmes de culture du soja, tout en augmentant les rendements de soja par rapport au témoin enherbé, là où une précipitation insuffisante n'est pas intervenue. Le méfluidide à 0,3 kg ai ha?1 a donné la plus faible destruction de S. halepense en culture classique et en non-culture. Une comparaison de la destruction de S. halepense dans les deux systèmes de culture n'était pas le but principal de ces travaux; cependant ces données font voir qu'un labourage pour briser les rhizomes de S. halepense n'est pas de rigueur pour obtenir une bonne maîtrise de l'adventice par des applications foliaires de fluazifop-butyle, séthoxydime, CGA-82725, HOE-00581 et glyphosate. Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. Bekämpfung mit blattwirksamen Herbiziden in Soyakulturen mit und ohne Bodenbearbeitung Es wurden separate Feldversuche zur Bekämpfung von Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. mit blattwirksamen Herbiziden in Soyakulturen (Glycinemax (L.) Merr. cv. Williams), ohne und mit Bodenbearbeitung (Mouldboard Pflug), ausgeführt. Fluazifop-Butyl, Sethoxydim, CGA-82725 und Mefluidid wurden postemergent auf 45 cm hohe und Glyphosat mit einem Docht-Streichgerät (wick bar) auf 90 cm hohe S. halepense appliziert; diese Produkte kamen in den Feldern mit und ohne Bodenbearbeitung zur Anwendung. HOE-00581 {Aethyl 2-[4-[(6-chlor-2-benzoazolyl)oxyl]phenoxy]propanoat} wurde nur auf den Parzellen ohne Bodenbearbeitung auf 45 cm hohe S. halepense appliziert. Fluazifop-Butyl, Sethoxydim, CGA-82725, HOE-00581 (Ohne Bodenbearbeitung) und Glyphosat erzielten in bearbeiteten und unbearbeiteten Feldern eine gute Bekämpfung von S. halepense und bewirkten im allgemeinen eine Erhöhung der Ernteerträge, sofern nicht geringe Niederschläge als limitierender Faktor auftraten. Mefluidid (0,3 kg ai ha?1) ergab die geringste Wirkung in bearbeiteten und unbearbeiteten Feldern. Diese Versuche waren nicht geplant um den Erfolg der S. halepense Bekämpfung unter den zwei Anbaubedingungen (mit resp. ohne Bodenbearbeitung) miteinander zu vergleichen; immerhin zeigen die Ergebnisse, dass eine Bodenbearbeitung zur Zerkleinerung der S. halepense-Rhizome nicht notwendig ist, um gute Effekte mit Fluazifop-Butyl, Sethoydim, CGA-82725, HOE-00581 und Glyphosat zuerzielen. 相似文献
9.
Summary. The efficacy of NN -diallyl-αα-dichloroacetamide (R-25788) as an antidote for reducing the injury of various herbicides in corn ( Zea mays L.) was tested under controlled conditions in growth rooms. The application of R-25788 to the soil as a pre-plant incorporated treatment to corn significantly reduced the toxicity often out of twenty-two herbicides tested. These ten herbicides were, in order of decreasing effectiveness of the antidote, EPTC, barban, sulfallate, vernolate, molinate, butylate, alachlor, pebulate, linuron and di-allate. In quartz sand nutrient culture, R-25788 was more effective as an antidote for barban applied to the foliage of corn than it was for barban applied to the roots.
Le NN- diallyl-αα-dichloroacétamide comme antidote de I'EPTC et autres herbicides dans le mais . 相似文献
Le NN- diallyl-αα-dichloroacétamide comme antidote de I'EPTC et autres herbicides dans le mais . 相似文献
10.
Broad-leaved plants are generally resistant to aryloxyphenoxypropionate (AOPP) and cyclohexanedione (CHD) herbicides. In laboratory experiments, however, we confirmed that Acanthospermum hispidum , a Compositae weed, was susceptible to one of the AOPP herbicides, fluazifop-butyl, but tolerant to other AOPP herbicides (quizalofop-ethyl and fenoxaprop-ethyl) and a CHD herbicide (sethoxydim). The symptoms induced by fluazifop-butyl in A. hispidum (wilting and necrosis) were distinctly different from those induced in oat (chlorosis). The period required to cause seedling death of A. hispidum (48–72 h) was shorter than that of oat ( ca 15 days). The ( R )-enantiomer of fluazifop-butyl was more active on this weed. In oat, lipid biosynthesis and acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACCase) activity were inhibited, and electrolyte leakage from the shoots was increased by fluazifop-butyl and sethoxydim. In the case of A. hispidum , the membrane permeability increased and the lipid biosynthesis was inhibited only by fluazifop-butyl. These results indicate that A. hispidum is particularly sensitive to fluazifop-butyl, and its mechanism of action in the plant may be different from its mechanism of action in oat. 相似文献
11.
Summary. From 1959 to 1962 the effects of some triazine and growth regulator herbicides applied pre-emergence and post-emergence to maize grown for silage were studied in field experiments on light to medium loam soils at Harper Adams College, Shropshire.
Atrazine applied pre-emergence at 1–1.5 lb/ac gave good control of annual weeds and was superior to simazine at equivalent rates. Soil moisture and rainfall after spraying were found to influence the activity of the triazines, but both were completely tolerated by maize. In 1960, 1961 and 1962 atrazine was much more effective against annual weeds than post-emergence applications of MCPA and 2,4-D. However MCPA and 2,4-D gave adequate control of a range of annual and perennial weeds under favourable conditions in 1959 and 1960 but results were poor in the two following years due to the presence of resistant and late germinating weeds .
The effect of the herbicides on development and yield of ihe maize are discussed.
Le désherbage chimique dans le mais 相似文献
Atrazine applied pre-emergence at 1–1.5 lb/ac gave good control of annual weeds and was superior to simazine at equivalent rates. Soil moisture and rainfall after spraying were found to influence the activity of the triazines, but both were completely tolerated by maize. In 1960, 1961 and 1962 atrazine was much more effective against annual weeds than post-emergence applications of MCPA and 2,4-D. However MCPA and 2,4-D gave adequate control of a range of annual and perennial weeds under favourable conditions in 1959 and 1960 but results were poor in the two following years due to the presence of resistant and late germinating weeds .
The effect of the herbicides on development and yield of ihe maize are discussed.
Le désherbage chimique dans le mais 相似文献
12.
R-25788 (2,2-Dichloro-N,N-diallylacetamide) was the most effective of six potential antidotes evaluated to counter corn (Zea mays L.) injury from the acetanilide herbicides alachlor, metolachlor, acetochlor, H-22234 (N-chloroacetyl-N-(2,6-diethylphenyl)glycine ethyl ester), and H-26910 (N-chloroacetyl-N-(2-methyl-6-cthylphenyl)glycine isopropyl ester). The other potential antidotes in order of decreasing effectiveness were: R-29148 (2,2-dimethyl-5-methyl-dichloroacetyloxazolidine), NA (1,8-naphthalic anhydride), CDAA (2-chloro-N,N-diallylacetamide), Carboxin (2,3-dihydro-5-carboxanilido-6-methyl-l,4-oxathiin), and gibberellin (GA3). GA3 only partly relieved the stunting of corn caused by EPTC and metolachlor and did not prevent other herbicide injury symptoms, suggesting that the mode of action of EPTC and metolachlor is not to simply block GA3 synthesis. R-25788 protected corn equally well from acetanilide or EPTC injury. Produits protecteurs du maïs (Zea mays) contre les dommages provoqués par les acétanilides herbicides Le R-25788 (2,2-dichloro-N.N-diallylacétamide) s'est révéléêtre le plus efficace de six produits protecteurs essayés pour préserver le maïs (Zeas mays L.) des dégâts provoqués par des acétanilides herbicides: alachlore, métolachlore, acétochlore, H-22234 (ester éthylique de la N-chloracétyl-N-(2,6-diéthylphényl) glycine) et H-26910 (ester isopropylique de la N-chloroacétyl-N-(2-méthyl-6-éthylphényl) glycine. Les autres produits protecteurs potentiels ont été, dans l'ordre d'efficacité décroissante: le R-29148 (2,2-diméthyl-5-méthyl-dichloroacéthyloxazolidine), l'AN (anhydride 1.8-naphtalique), le CDAA (2-chloro-N-N-diallylacétamide), la carboxyne (2,3-dihydro-5-carboxanilido-6-méthyl-l,4-oxathiine) et la gibbérelline (A3 G). Cette dernière a seulement atténué le rabou-grissement provoqué par l.EPTC et le métolachlore chez le maïs. Elle n'a pas supprimé les symptômes de dommages provoqués par les autres herbicides, ce qui suggère que le mode d'action de I'EPTC et du métolachlore ne consiste pas seulement en un blocage de la synthèse de la gibbérelline. Le R-25788 a protégé le maïs des dommages provoqués par l'acétanilide ainsi que par I'EPTC. Potentielle Antidots zur Vermeidung von Acetanilid-Herbizid-schäden an Mais (Zea mays) Von sechs potentiellen Antidots, die geprüft wurden, um Schäden an Mais (Zea mays L.) durch Acetanilid-Herbizide zu vermeiden, war R-25788 (2,2-Dichlor-N,N-diallylacetamid) am wirksamsten. Die verwendeten Herbizide waren: Alachlor, Metolachlor, Acetochlor, H-22234 [N-Chloracetyl-N-(2,6- diäthylphenyl) glycin Älhylester] und H-26910 [N-Chloracelyl-N-(2-méthyl-6-äthylphenyl)glycin lsopropylester]. Die weiteren möglichen Antidots, in der Reihenfolge abnehmender Wirksamkeit, waren: R-29148 (2,2-Dimethyl-5-methyldichlorace-toxazolidin), NA (1,8-Naphthalsäureanhydrid), CDAA (2-Chlor-N,N-diallylacetamid), Carboxin (2,3-Dihydro-5-car- boxanilido-6-methyl-l,4-oxathiin) und Gibberellin (GA3). durch GA3 wurde die dureh EPTC und Metolachlor verursachte Stauchung des Mais nur teilweise vermieden. Die durch andere Herbizide verusachten Symptome liessen sich durch GA3 nicht vermeiden, was darauf schliessen lässt, dass die Wirkungsweise von EPTC und Metolachlor nicht einfach mit einer Blockierung der GA3 -Synthese zu erklären ist. R-25788 schützte Mais gleichermassen vor Acetanilid-, wie vor EPTC-Schäden. 相似文献
13.
Summary. During the period 1956-61, twelve replicated field experiments were conducted to determine the response of spring-sown broad beans ( Vicia faba L.) and annual weeds to various pre- and post-emergence herbicides. On a sandy loam, the best results were given by pre-emergence applications of simazine 0.75 lb/ac, trietazine 1.5 lb/ac, chlorpropham 1 lb+diuron 0.2 lb/ac or dinoseb-amine 4 lb/ac. Amiben proved insufficiently selective, while chlorpropham+fenuron caused greater crop injury than the corresponding mixture with diuron. Post-emergence application of dinoseb-amine was less satisfactory than the best of the pre-emergence treatments.
Le désherbage chimique des fèves semées au printemps 相似文献
Le désherbage chimique des fèves semées au printemps 相似文献
14.
Quinclorac (3,7-dichloro-8-quinolinecarboxylic acid) is a new herbicide in United States rice production. Field studies were conducted in 1990 and 1991 in Mississippi to determine the influence of application timings and rates on weed control efficacy and rice yield. Control of Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. (barnyard-grass), Sesbania exaltata (Raf.) Rydb. ex A. W. Hill (hemp sesbania) and Ipomoea wrightii Gray (palmleaf morning glory) were greatest with early post-emergence application. Efficacy of pre-emergence application depends strongly on soil moisture, with significantly reduced weed control resulting when applied to dry soil. Weed control with pre-emergence application to moist soil was comparable with early post-emergence application at higher rates of quinclorac. Pre-plant and incorporated quinclorac controlled weeds effectively. Control of E. crus-galli, S. exaltata and I. wrightii ranged from 73 to 99%, 75 to 99%, and 92 to 99% at 28 days after treatment, respectively. Rice yield generally reflected weed control. No rice injury was observed for any treatment. Results indicate that early post-emergence application of quinclorac is the best time for using reduced rates and field conditions at application should be considered with these rates pre-emergence. 相似文献
15.
Effective weed management in maize-wheat (M-W) cropping systems are accountable for higher yield and plant biomass. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of manual weeding and chemicals (pre- and post-emergence herbicide) for actual weed control to enhance maize yield and M?W system productivity. Herbicides were treated as pre-emergence (sole), post-emergence (sole) and its combined application (pre- and post-emergence) for weed eradication and suppression. Sole pre-emergence herbicide (acetyclour?+?atrazine) and sole post-emergence herbicides (nicosulfuron), and its mixed application were used in the experiments. The experiment was comprised on 6 treatments with one weedy check or control plot: W1?=?weedy check, W2?=?acetyclour?+?atrazine, W3?=?atrazine, W4?=?nicosulfuron, W5?=?nicosulfuron?+?atrazine, W6?=?acetyclour?+?atrazine?+?nicosulfuron and W7?=?manual weeding. Main weeds were Cyperus rotundus, Tribulus terrestris, Dactyloctenium aegyptium and Cynodon dactylon. Experiential findings revealed that manual weeding was found most effective in terms of controlling weed and suppression. Among the herbicides application, promising results in terms of weed destruction and suppression were shown by combined application of acetyclour?+?atrazine?+?nicosulfuron which effectively controlled weeds as compared to other treatments. It was concluded that manual weeding drastically reduced weeds frequency and biomass while among the herbicides application acetyclour?+?atrazine and nicosulfuron could be promising for weeds suppression and clamp downing as compared to all other treatments under M?W cropping system.
相似文献16.
The ability of the herbicide safeners, BAS-145138 (1-dichloroacetyl-hexahydro-3,3,8a-trimethyl-pyrrolo(1,2a)pyrimidin-6(2H)-one), dichlormid (N,N-diallyl-2,2-dichloroacetamide), flurazole (phenylmethyl ester), and MG-191 (2-dichloromelhyl-2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane) for preventing metazachlor injury to maize (Zea mays L.) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) seedlings were compared with their effects on 14C-metazachlor metabolism to a glutathione (GSH) conjugate, effects on non-protein thiol contents (mainly GSH) and effects on Glutathione S-transferase (GST) activity in these two species. Sorghum shoot growth was reduced by 41% and maize shoot growth was reduced by 54%, by metazachlor concentrations in vermiculite nutrient culture of 0·6 μM and 7·5μM, respectively. In this system, all four compounds had significant activity as safeners for metazachlor in both sorghum and maize seedlings. BAS-145138 and flurazole were the most effective safeners in maize and sorghum, respectively. In the absence of safeners, the rate of non-enzymatic conjugation of metazachlor and GSH was much greater than the enzymatic rate. However, the rate of enzymatic conjugation of metazachlor with GSH was increased by safener treatment in both maize and sorghum. Safener effectiveness was highly correlated with increases in 14C-metazachlor uptake and metabolism in both species. Safener effectiveness was more highly correlated with safener effects on GST activity in maize or sorghum when 14C-metazachlor was used as the substrate than when the non-specific CDNB (1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene) was used as the substrate. Safener effectiveness was also strongly correlated with safener effects on GSH levels in sorghum, but not in maize, possibly because of the greater importance of non-enzymatic conjugation of metazachlor with GSH in sorghum as compared to maize. 相似文献
17.
Uptake and phytotoxicity of chlorsulfuron in Zea mays L. in the presence of 1,8-naphthalic anhydride
The sites of uptake of chlorsulfuron in maize (Zea mays L.) were investigated at three different growth stages. Exposure of seedling roots, or shoots separately, to herbicide-treated sand over 4 days resulted in inhibition of both roots and shoots. Exposure of seedling roots to chlorsulfuron-treated soil over 21 days severely inhibited both roots and foliage, while separate shoot exposure also reduced both foliage and root growth. After plant emergence, exposure of the crown root node, growing point and lower stem to treated soil reduced foliage and root growth, but exposure of the shoot above the growing point caused only slight inhibition of foliage and had no effect on roots. The herbicide safener 1,8-naphthalic anhydride (NA) applied as a dust (10 g kg?1 seed weight), or as a 50 mg 1?1 suspension in water to maize seeds, reduced the root inhibition by chlorsulfuron in 4-day-old seedlings. NA completely prevented both foliage and root injury when chlorsulfuron was placed in soil in the shoot zone before emergence, or in the shoot zone below the soil surface after plant emergence. NA slightly decreased injury to foliage, but not to roots when chlorsulfuron was placed in soil in the root zone before emergence. NA seed treatment protected both roots and foliage against injury from foliarly applied chlorsulfuron. Plants were also protected when a suspension of NA in water was sprayed on the foliage seven days before chlorsulfuron. When a mixture of NA and chlorsulfuron was applied to foliage, root injury was reduced more than foliage injury. 相似文献
18.
Fluazifop-butyl, haloxyfop and sethoxydim with adjuvant oil were applied for three successive growing seasons to established strawberries infested with Elymus repens. The weed was virtually eradicated by three applications of haloxyfop (0.8 kg a.e. ha?1) in successive years. A similar effect was given by five applications of haloxyfop (0.4 kg a.e. ha?1) and fluazifop-butyl (1.6 kg AI ha?1) in three growing seasons. Lower rates of haloxyfop and fluazifop-butyl, and a high rate of sethoxydim (1.6 kg AI ha?1) applied five times were less effective, the ground cover of E. repens shoots not being reduced by the end of the experiment although weight of living rhizome was only 10-30% of that on untreated plots. Fruit yields on treated plots generally reflected the level of E. repens control, but there was some evidence of crop phytotoxicity from herbicide treatments. During the experiment E. repens untreated plots increased from about 30-100% ground cover and reduced yield 13, 28 and 68% in successive years compared with weed-free plots. 相似文献
19.
R. A. Yates 《国际虫害防治杂志》2013,59(4):584-588
Abstract Experiments have been carried out on the south coast of Puerto Rico to determine the susceptibility of Leptochloa filiformis, Echinochloa colonum and Saccharum officinarum-spontaneum-robustum hybrids (sugarcane) to various herbicides applied post-emergence. Ametryne proved to be the most suitable herbicide for use as a selective post-emergence grass-killer in sugarcane. The crop is resistant to rates of up to 1.6 lb a.i./ac, while very young seedling grasses are highly susceptible to this or lower rates. During tillering, the weed grasses rapidly become resistant and even 3.2 lb a.i./ac (which damages emerged cane) does not kill fully tillered seedlings. The residual pre-emergence effect of ametryne applied over seedling grasses is as pronounced as when this herbicide is applied to clean ground. 相似文献
20.
The average endogenous GSH content of eight lines of inbred corn was almost twofold greater than ten varieties of hybrid corn. When inbred and hybrid corn lines were treated with R-25788, the average GSH content increased by 56 and 95%, respectively. R-25788 protected two special inbred corn lines, GT 112 (atrazine susceptible) and GT 112 RfRf (atrazine resistant) from EPTC injury by increasing the GSH content and GSH S-transferase activity in roots. Most of the radiolabel from [14C]R-25788-treated plants remained in the root tissues whereas the radiolabel in [14C]EPTC-treated plants was evenly distributed between foliar and root tissues. From radiolabel experiments, hybrid corn seedlings were found to absorb more R-25788 from soil than EPTC. There was no difference between inbred and hybrid corn in the amounts of R-25788 or EPTC taken up or in the enhancement of GSH S-transferase activity caused by R-25788. 相似文献