Interaction between acetylcholinesterase and choline acetyltransferase: an hypothesis to explain unusual toxicological responses     

Denis Bourguet  Michel Raymond  Saïd Berrada  Didier Fournier 《Pest management science》1997,51(3):276-282

Organophosphorus and carbamate insecticides are thought to have only one target site, acetylcholinesterase (EC 3.1.1.7). When this enzyme is inhibited, the neurotransmitter acetylcholine is not metabolized and polarization of the post-synaptic membrane does not take place. But, what happens when the cholinesterase becomes resistant or when neurotransmitter levels are diminished? Here, we report results suggesting that choline acetyltransferase (EC 2.3.1.6), the enzyme responsible for the acetylcholine production, may be involved either as an alternative pesticide target site or as a factor enhancing survival during insecticide exposure. This underlines the concept that the pivotal step for insecticide toxicology is not the acetylcholinesterase activity but the amount of acetylcholine present. This latter can only fluctuate between an upper and a lower threshold, and crossing one of these two thresholds leads to the death of the insect. The interaction between acetylcholinesterase and choline acetyltransferase activities would explain the astonishing toxicological phenomenon that, in some conditions, mortality decreases when insecticide concentration increases. ©1997 SCI  相似文献   

Strong fisheries management and governance positively impact ecosystem status          下载免费PDF全文

Alida Bundy  Ratana Chuenpagdee  Jennifer L Boldt  Maria de Fatima Borges  Mohamed Lamine Camara  Marta Coll  Ibrahima Diallo  Clive Fox  Elizabeth A Fulton  Ayse Gazihan  Astrid Jarre  Didier Jouffre  Kristin M Kleisner  Ben Knight  Jason Link  Patroba P Matiku  Hicham Masski  Dimitrios K Moutopoulos  Chiara Piroddi  Tiit Raid  Ignacio Sobrino  Jorge Tam  Djiga Thiao  Maria Angeles Torres  Konstantinos Tsagarakis  Gro I van der Meeren  Yunne‐Jai Shin 《Fish and Fisheries》2017,18(3):412-439

Fisheries have had major negative impacts on marine ecosystems, and effective fisheries management and governance are needed to achieve sustainable fisheries, biodiversity conservation goals and thus good ecosystem status. To date, the IndiSeas programme (Indicators for the Seas) has focussed on assessing the ecological impacts of fishing at the ecosystem scale using ecological indicators. Here, we explore fisheries ‘Management Effectiveness’ and ‘Governance Quality’ and relate this to ecosystem health and status. We developed a dedicated expert survey, focused at the ecosystem level, with a series of questions addressing aspects of management and governance, from an ecosystem‐based perspective, using objective and evidence‐based criteria. The survey was completed by ecosystem experts (managers and scientists) and results analysed using ranking and multivariate methods. Results were further examined for selected ecosystems, using expert knowledge, to explore the overall findings in greater depth. Higher scores for ‘Management Effectiveness’ and ‘Governance Quality’ were significantly and positively related to ecosystems with better ecological status. Key factors that point to success in delivering fisheries and conservation objectives were as follows: the use of reference points for management, frequent review of stock assessments, whether Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated (IUU) catches were being accounted for and addressed, and the inclusion of stakeholders. Additionally, we found that the implementation of a long‐term management plan, including economic and social dimensions of fisheries in exploited ecosystems, was a key factor in successful, sustainable fisheries management. Our results support the thesis that good ecosystem‐based management and governance, sustainable fisheries and healthy ecosystems go together.  相似文献   

Size matters: How single-species management can contribute to ecosystem-based fisheries management   总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1  

Rainer Froese  Amanda Stern-Pirlot  Henning Winker  Didier Gascuel 《Fisheries Research》2008,92(2-3):231-241

In this study we show how substantial gains towards the goals of ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM) can be achieved by different single-species management. We show that fishing has much less impact on stocks if fish are caught after they have reached the size (L_opt) where growth rate and cohort biomass are maximum. To demonstrate our point we compare the impact of three fishing scenarios on 9 stocks from the North Sea and the Baltic. Scenario (1) is the current fishing regime, scenario (2) is a new management regime proposed by the European Commission, aiming for maximum sustainable yield obtained from all stocks, and scenario (3) is set so that it achieves the same yield as scenario (2), albeit with fishing on sizes beyond L_opt. Results show that scenarios (2) and (3) are significant improvements compared to current fishing practice. However, scenario (3) consistently shows least impact on the stocks, with seven-fold higher biomass of demersal fishes and an age structure similar to an unfished stock. This allows juveniles and adults to better fulfil their ecological roles, a major step towards the goals of ecosystem-based fisheries management. We give examples where scenario (3) is practiced in successful fisheries. We present a new interpretation of the relative yield per recruit isopleth diagram with indication of a new target area for fisheries operating within the context of EBFM. We present a new expression of the relative biomass per recruit isopleth diagram, which supports our analysis. We conclude that size matters for precautionary and ecosystem-based fisheries management and present a list of additional advantages associated with fishing at L_opt.  相似文献