Application of hydrochar and pyrochar to manure is not effective for mitigation of ammonia emissions from cattle slurry and poultry manure     

M.?Gronwald  M.?HelfrichEmail authorView author&#;s OrcID profile  A.?Don  R.?Fu?  R.?Well  H.?Flessa 《Biology and Fertility of Soils》2018,54(4):451-465

Nitrogen (N) loss as ammonia (NH₃) from agricultural systems is one of the major sources of atmospheric pollutants and is responsible for more than 50% of global NH₃ emissions. Ammonia volatilization from animal manures may be altered by amendment with chars derived from pyrolysis (pyrochars) or hydrothermal carbonization (hydrochars) by providing exchange sites for ammonium (NH₄⁺) or changing the pH of manure. Pyrochar and hydrochar differ in chemical and structural composition, specific surface area, and pH and therefore may affect NH₃ volatilization differently. In a laboratory incubation experiment, we investigated the effect of pyrochar (pH 9.0) and hydrochar (pH 3.8) from Miscanthus on NH₃ emission after addition to poultry manure and cattle slurry. We analyzed manure treatments with and without char addition and acidification and determined the effect of char addition on immobilization of manure-derived NH₄⁺. Ammonia emission from pure poultry manure amounted 84% of the applied NH₄⁺-N, while 67% of the applied NH₄⁺-N was lost as NH₃ from cattle slurry. Addition of pyrochar or hydrochar had no or only marginal effects on NH₃ emissions except for a reduction in NH₃ emissions by 19% due to hydrochar application to CS (p?<?0.05), which seems to be primarily related to the char pH. Sorption of NH₄⁺ by admixture of chars to manure was generally small: between 0.1- and 0.5-mg NH₄⁺-N g^?1 chars were sorbed. This corresponds to between 0.1 and 3.5% of the NH₄⁺ applied, which obviously was not strong enough to reduce emissions of NH₃. Overall, our results do not provide evidence that addition of pyrochar or hydrochar to cattle slurry and poultry manure is an effective measure to reduce NH₃ volatilization.  相似文献