| 轮耕对小麦–玉米两熟农田耕层构造及作物产量与品质的影响 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 聂良鹏,郭利伟,牛海燕,魏杰,李增嘉,宁堂原.轮耕对小麦–玉米两熟农田耕层构造及作物产量与品质的影响[J].作物学报,2015,41(3):468-478. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 聂良鹏 郭利伟 牛海燕 魏杰 李增嘉 宁堂原 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1山东农业大学作物生物学国家重点实验室 / 土肥资源高效利用国家工程实验室 / 山东省高校作物生理生态重点实验室，山东泰安 271018；2滕州市农业局，山东滕州 277519；3民权县农业局，河南民权 476800 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 本研究由“十二五”国家科技支撑项目(2012BAD14B07)和国家公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201103001)资助。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 为了解不同轮耕模式对小麦-玉米两熟制耕层构造、作物产量和品质的影响,从2009年小麦季开始至2012年玉米生长季结束连续3个种植周期设置小麦季免耕、深松或翻耕+玉米季免耕或深松的6种耕作模式组合,研究其对农田土壤孔隙度和水分含量、作物产量、以及籽粒蛋白质含量、油分含量和容重的影响。结果表明,与免耕相比,玉米季深松大幅度提高0~40 cm土壤的周年总孔隙度,小麦季深松或翻耕改善了土壤孔隙状况。小麦季耕作和玉米季耕作的交互效应是各层次土壤毛管孔隙度的决定因素,而玉米季耕作的独立效应是土壤各层次非毛管孔隙度的决定因素。小麦季深松和翻耕促进小麦生育后期对土壤水分的吸收,深松较翻耕和免耕处理的小麦产量显著升高。玉米季深松比免耕提高了玉米在灌浆阶段对水分的吸收,有利于提高玉米产量,同时对后茬小麦有积极作用。从全年产量与品质看,6种耕作模式组合中,全年两季深松效果最佳,其次是小麦季深松+玉米季免耕,这两种轮耕模式均适合在华北平原推广应用。
|
| 关 键 词： | 轮耕 小麦-玉米两熟制 耕层构造 产量 品质 |
| 收稿时间： | 2014-03-20 |
Effects of Rotational Tillage on Tilth Soil Structure and Crop Yield and Quality in Maize–Wheat Cropping System |
| |
| NIE Liang- Peng,GUO Li-Wei,NIU Hai-Yan,WEI Jie,LI Zeng-Jia,NING Tang-Yuan.Effects of Rotational Tillage on Tilth Soil Structure and Crop Yield and Quality in Maize–Wheat Cropping System[J].Acta Agronomica Sinica,2015,41(3):468-478. |
| |
| Authors: | NIE Liang- Peng GUO Li-Wei NIU Hai-Yan WEI Jie LI Zeng-Jia NING Tang-Yuan |
| |
| Institution: | 1.State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology / National Engineering Laboratory for Efficient Utilization of Soil and Fertilizer Resources / Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology in Universities of Shandong Province, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, China;2.Tengzhou Agricultural Bureau, Tengzhou 277519, China;3.Minquan Agricultural Bureau, Minquan 476800 China |
| |
| Abstract: | In a three-year field experiment from the wheat season of 2009 to the maize season of 2012 in North China., we compared the effects of six tillage systems (zero-tillage, subsoiling, and conventional tillage before wheat sowing; zero-tillage and subsoiling before maize sowing) on soil porosity, moisture content, and crop yield and quality. Compared with zero-tillage, subsoiling before maize sowing greatly increased the annual mean soil total porosity in 0–40 cm soil layer, and subsoiling or conventional tillage before wheat sowing was also in favor of improving soil total porosity in 0–40 cm layer. The interaction between tillage practices in wheat and maize seasons had the largest influence on soil porosity, and the tillage in maize season determined the soil non-capillary porosity. Subsoiling and conventional tillages in wheat season resulted in more water absorption at late wheat growth stage than zero-tillage; particularly, wheat yield in subsoiling was the highest with significant differences from that of zero-tillage and conventional tillage. Subsoiling in maize season had more water absorption at filling stage and yield promotion than zero-tillage. Meanwhile, subsoiling in maize season had a successive effect in the following wheat season. In an overview of yield and grain quality, subsoiling in both maize and wheat seasons was the most optimal tillage mode for wheat-maize cropping system in North China, followed by subsoiling in wheat season plus zero-tillage in maize season. |
| |
| Keywords: | Rotational tillage Maize-wheat cropping system Tilth soil structure Yield Grain quality |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《作物学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《作物学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
