首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

施氮量和玉米-花生间作模式对氮磷吸收与利用的影响
引用本文:焦念元,宁堂原,赵春,侯连涛,李增嘉,李友军,付国占,韩宾.施氮量和玉米-花生间作模式对氮磷吸收与利用的影响[J].作物学报,2008,34(4):706-712.
作者姓名:焦念元  宁堂原  赵春  侯连涛  李增嘉  李友军  付国占  韩宾
作者单位:1 山东农业大学农学院 / 作物生物学国家重点实验室, 山东泰安271018; 2 河南科技大学农学院, 河南洛阳471003; 3 东营职业学院, 山东东营257091; 4 山东轻工业学院, 山东济南250100
基金项目:山东省财政厅财政支农项目 , 河南科技大学校科研和教改项目 , 河南科技大学校科研和教改项目
摘    要:2004—2005年在山东泰安研究了施氮量与种植方式对玉米和花生产量、生物量、氮磷吸收与利用以及蛋白质产量的影响。结果表明, 与单作相比, 玉米-花生间作显著提高了玉米产量和氮、磷吸收量, 但降低了花生产量和氮吸收量。2行玉米4行花生间作模式(2∶4间作模式)的产量、生物量、蛋白质产量、氮磷吸收量以及氮磷吸收利用效率均高于2行玉米8行花生间作模式(2∶8间作模式); 2∶4间作模式的氮、磷吸收效率均显著高于单作模式, 土地当量比(LER)和蛋白质土地当量比(PLER)均大于1, 土地利用率提高8%~17%, 间作优势明显。与不施氮处理相比, 施氮处理显著提高间作玉米产量, 间作花生增产不显著, 促进玉米-花生间作体系氮、磷积累, 提高了氮、磷吸收总量及磷吸收利用效率, 从而显著提高了间作体系的产量和蛋白质产量, 间作优势却随施氮量的增加而降低。

关 键 词:种植方式  施氮量  玉米-花生间作  氮吸收与利用  磷吸收与利用
文章编号:10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.00706
收稿时间:2007-05-11
修稿时间:2007年5月11日

Effect of Nitrogen Application and Planting Pattern on N and P Absorption and Use in Maize-Peanut Intercropping System
JIAO Nian-Yuan,NING Tang-Yuan,ZHAO Chun,HOU Lian-Tao,LI Zeng-Jia,LI You-Jun,FU Guo-Zhan,HAN Bin.Effect of Nitrogen Application and Planting Pattern on N and P Absorption and Use in Maize-Peanut Intercropping System[J].Acta Agronomica Sinica,2008,34(4):706-712.
Authors:JIAO Nian-Yuan  NING Tang-Yuan  ZHAO Chun  HOU Lian-Tao  LI Zeng-Jia  LI You-Jun  FU Guo-Zhan  HAN Bin
Institution:1.College of Agronomy / State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, Shandong;2.College of ;Agronomy, Henan University of Science &Technology, Luoyang 471003, Henan;3.Dongying Vocational College, Dongying 257091, Shandong;4.Shandong Institute o f Light Industry, Jinan 250100, Shandong, China
Abstract:A field experiment was carried out for revealing the effects of nitrogen application and planting pattern on yield, biomass, N and P absorption, protein yield of maize (Zea mays L.)-peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) intercropping system in 2004 and 2005. The results showed that the yield, N and P absorption of intercropping maize increased significantly, however, the yield and N absorption of intercropping peanut was reduced in the intercropping system, compared with monocropping maize or peanut respectively. The 2-row maize and 4-row peanut pattern (2:4 pattern) showed higher (P<0.01) values than the 2-row maize and 8-row peanut pattern (2:8 pattern) in yield, biomass, protein yield, N and P fertilizer absorption efficiencies, N and P use efficiencies of intercropping system, and higher (P<0.01) values than the two monocropping systems in N and P absorption efficiencies. Both the land equivalent ratio for yield (LER) and land equivalent ratio for protein yield (PLER) in 2:4 pattern were above 1, and the land use ratio enhanced by 8%–17%, implying obvious intercropping dominance. Compared with zero N application, nitrogen fertilizer increased yield and protein yield of maize and peanut in the intercropping system by promoting the accumulation and absorption of N and P, enhancing P use efficiency, but the intercropping dominance was weakened with the increase of nitrogen fertilizer.
Keywords:Planting pattern  Nitrogen application level  Maize-peanut intercropping  N absorption and use  P absorption and use
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《作物学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《作物学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号