In vitro comparison of three fixation methods for humeral fracture repair in adult horses |
| |
| Authors: | M D Markel D M Nunamaker J D Wheat A E Sams |
| |
| Institution: | Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis 95616. |
| |
| Abstract: | The stiffness, load to failure, and bending moments of adult intact equine humeri and humeri repaired with 3 fixation techniques were determined in vitro. Bones were tested in axial compression (30 pairs), mediolateral 3-point bending (15 pairs), and caudocranial 3-point bending (15 pairs). An oblique osteotomy of 1 humerus of each pair was performed to simulate the long spiral oblique fractures that occur clinically in horses. Bones were repaired in 3 ways: group 1--nylon band cerclage fixation (20 bones); group 2--multiple intramedullary pinning (20 bones); and group 3--nylon band cerclage fixation and multiple intramedullary pinning (20 bones). Intact bones were significantly (P less than 0.05) stronger than repaired bones in each testing mode. Bones repaired with bands only were significantly less stiff in bending than were bones repaired with pins only or with pins and bands. In compression, only specimens repaired with pins and bands were significantly stiffer than were bones repaired with bands only. Bones repaired with bands only required significantly less load to failure in compression and in caudocranial bending than did bones repaired with pins only or with pins and bands. Bones repaired with pins only deformed through the full displacement of the actuator (5 cm), and pins deformed plastically. Bones repaired with pins and bands were stiffer and had higher bending moments than did bones repaired with pins only, but the differences were not significant. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
