首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

香蕉细菌性软腐病防控药剂筛选及田间应用效果评价
引用本文:番华彩,曾莉,李卫雁,丁云秀,郭志祥,李舒,徐胜涛,郑泗军,王永斌.香蕉细菌性软腐病防控药剂筛选及田间应用效果评价[J].中国农学通报,2022,38(31):113-118.
作者姓名:番华彩  曾莉  李卫雁  丁云秀  郭志祥  李舒  徐胜涛  郑泗军  王永斌
作者单位:1.云南省农业科学院农业环境资源研究所,昆明 650205;2.西双版纳傣族自治州绿色食品与乡村产业发展中心,云南景洪 666100;3.云南省澜沧县茶叶和特色生物产业发展中心,云南普洱 665600
基金项目:财政部和农业农村部国家现代农业产业技术体系(CARS-31)
摘    要:为筛选出香蕉细菌性软腐病的有效防控药剂,通过室内抑菌、盆栽防效以及大田试验,系统开展香蕉细菌性软腐病防治药剂筛选,为生产上的防治提供参考和科学依据。采用含毒介质法中的最低抑制浓度法,测定包括抗生素类和非抗生素类等11种杀菌剂对香蕉细菌性软腐病菌的室内抑菌效果,筛选具有抑菌效果的10种药剂进行盆栽试验,并对4种盆栽试验防治效果较好的药剂开展田间防治试验。结果表明:(1)11种药剂中抗生素类药剂以四霉素抑菌效果较好,抑菌最低有效浓度为1.74 μg/mL,其次为硫酸链霉素、春雷霉素、中生菌素,抑菌最低有效浓度分别为9.10、29.50、89.10 μg/mL;非抗生素类药剂以铜制剂类抑菌效果较好,噻霉酮抑菌最低有效浓度为89.55 μg/mL,其次为王铜、噻菌铜,抑菌最低有效浓度分别为445.00、595.00 μg/mL。(2)春雷霉素的盆栽防治效果较好,防效达67.97%,其次为噻霉酮、中生菌素、噻菌铜,防效分别为64.58%、63.53%、61.83%。(3)春雷霉素防治效果达90.19%,其次为噻霉酮、中生菌素、噻菌铜,防治效果分别为89.84%、84.60%、74.59%。4种药剂对香蕉细菌性软腐病的田间防治效果较好,可作为该病害的防治药剂在生产中交替喷淋应用。

关 键 词:香蕉  玉米迪基氏菌  防控  药剂筛选  田间应用  
收稿时间:2021-11-26

Bactericides Screening and Field Application for Banana Bacterial Soft Rot
FAN Huacai,ZENG Li,LI Weiyan,DING Yunxiu,GUO Zhixiang,LI Shu,XU Shengtao,ZHENG Sijun,WANG Yongbin.Bactericides Screening and Field Application for Banana Bacterial Soft Rot[J].Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,2022,38(31):113-118.
Authors:FAN Huacai  ZENG Li  LI Weiyan  DING Yunxiu  GUO Zhixiang  LI Shu  XU Shengtao  ZHENG Sijun  WANG Yongbin
Institution:1.Institute of Agriculture Environment and Resource, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming 650205;2.Green Food and Rural Industry Development Center of Xishuangbanna Dai Autonomous Prefecture, Jinghong, Yunnan 666100;3.Yunnan Langcang Tea and Characteristic Biological Industry Development Center, Pu’er, Yunnan 665600
Abstract:To screen effective bactericides against banana bacterial soft rot, indoor inhibitory, pot and field experiments were conducted to evaluate the control effect. The minimum inhibitory concentration method in the toxic medium method was used to determine the indoor inhibitory effect of 11 bactericides including antibiotics and non-antibiotics on the banana bacterial soft rot. Ten bactericides with inhibitory effect were selected for pot control experiment. Four bactericides with good pot control effect were selected for field control evaluation. The results are as follows. (1) Among the 11 kinds of antibiotics, tetramycin had good inhibitory effect, and the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) was 1.74 μg/mL, followed by streptomycin sulfate, kasugamycin, zhongshengmycin, of which the MIC was 9.10, 29.50 and 89.10 μg/mL, respectively. Among non-antibiotics bactericides’ tests, benziothiazolinone had the greatest inhibitory effect with MIC of 89.55 μg/mL, and the MIC of copper oxychloride and thiodiazole-copper was 445.00 and 595.00 μg/mL, respectively. (2) Pot experiment showed that kasugamycin, benziothiazolinone, zhongshengmycin and thiodiazole-copper had good control effect, with the control effect of 67.97%, 64.58%, 63.53% and 61.83%, respectively. (3) Field experiments showed that the control effect of kasugamycin was 90.19%, followed by that of benziothiazolinone, zhongshengmycin and thiodiazole-copper, which was 89.84%, 84.60% and 74.59%, respectively. In summary, the 4 bactericides have good control effect on banana bacterial soft rot, which could be popularized in production by spraying.
Keywords:banana  Dickeya zeae  control  bactericides screening  field application  
点击此处可从《中国农学通报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国农学通报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号