首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

农牧一体化下杂草生物多样性及玉米生产效益研究
引用本文:边步云,关法春,张永锋,程犇,仝淑萍.农牧一体化下杂草生物多样性及玉米生产效益研究[J].中国农业大学学报,2018,23(9):139-147.
作者姓名:边步云  关法春  张永锋  程犇  仝淑萍
作者单位:吉林省农业科学院农村能源与生态研究所;西藏农牧学院高原生态研究所
基金项目:国家科技支撑计划(2012BAD14B05);吉林省农业科技创新工程项目;西藏特色农牧资源研发协同创新中心高原生态研究平台资助
摘    要:为研究农牧一体化对杂草生物多样性的影响,通过延军农场农牧一体化长期定位试验,采用田间对比试验方法,对放牧前后田间杂草种类、密度、盖度和地上生物量以及玉米产量进行调查研究,分析农牧一体化生产方式对杂草生物多样性及玉米生产效益的影响。结果表明:放牧前,农牧一体化(API)理杂草总密度是对照(CK)的1.41倍,且杂草优势种单一且相对多度分配不均匀;API杂草地上生物量比CK高出18.12kg/hm2;API杂草群落的Shannon-Wiener多样性指数(H′)、Pielou均匀度指数(E)、Simpson优势度指数(D)和Margalef丰富度指数(DMG)分别是CK的1.09、0.92、1.05和1.08倍。放牧后,API和CK杂草总密度分别减少77.00%和23.10%,杂草群落地上生物量依次分别下降94.18%和78.17%,故田间放养鹅可将田间16.01%杂草资源化,提高杂草生产力;API玉米产量是CK的0.92倍,减产所带来的经济损失达2 443.51元/hm2,鹅肉产品输出对经济总收入的贡献率高达48.74%,折合为25 922.80元/hm2;API的产投比(2.87)是CK(2.49)的1.15倍,API能够提高生产效益。因此,API处理使用鹅来控制杂草并将杂草资源化,提高生产力和生物多样性,可实现较高经济效益。

关 键 词:农牧一体化  玉米田养鹅  生物多样性  生产效益
收稿时间:2017/12/1 0:00:00

Effects of agro-pastoral integration on weed biodiversity in field and maize production
BIAN Buyun,GUAN Fachun,ZHANG Yongfeng,CHENG Ben and TONG Shuping.Effects of agro-pastoral integration on weed biodiversity in field and maize production[J].Journal of China Agricultural University,2018,23(9):139-147.
Authors:BIAN Buyun  GUAN Fachun  ZHANG Yongfeng  CHENG Ben and TONG Shuping
Institution:Institute of Plateau Ecology, Tibet Agriculture and Animal Husbandry College, Linzhi 860000, China,Rural Energy and Ecology Institute, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun 130033, China,Rural Energy and Ecology Institute, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun 130033, China,Institute of Plateau Ecology, Tibet Agriculture and Animal Husbandry College, Linzhi 860000, China and Institute of Plateau Ecology, Tibet Agriculture and Animal Husbandry College, Linzhi 860000, China
Abstract:Through the long-term positioning experiment of "Agro-pastoral integration(API)" on Yanjun Farm. Comparative field experiments were conducted to analyze the impact of agro-pastoral integration production methods on weed biodiversity and corn production efficiency. The weed species, density, coverage, aboveground biomass, and corn yield in the field pre-grazing and post-grazing were investigated. The results showed that:The total weed density API treatment was 1.41 times of that of control (CK) pre-grazing, and the weed dominant species were unitary and its relative abundance was not evenly distributed; The weeds aboveground-biomass of API was 18.12 kg/hm2 higher than that of CK; The Shannon-Wiener diversity index (H''), Pielou evenness index (E), Simpson dominance index (D) and Margalef richness index(DMG) of API weed communities were 1.09, 0.92, 1.05 and 1.08 times of CK, respectively; The total densities of API post-grazing and CK were reduced by 77.00% and 23.10%, respectively. The aboveground-biomass of weed community decreased by 94.18% and 78.17%. Therefore, geese transformed the 16.01% weeds in the field into resources and improve weed productivity. The corn yield in API field was 0.92 times of CK, and the economic loss caused by the reduction of production amounted was up to 2 443.51 yuan/hm2; Goose product output converted to 25 922.80 yuan/hm2, it contributed to the total economic income as high as 48.74%; API investment ratio (2.87) is 1.15 times of that of CK (2.49). In conclusion, API system by raising geese in corn fields to control weeds in API system, converted weeds into resources, improved the productivity and biodiversity, and achieved high economic efficiency.
Keywords:agro-pastoral integration  raising geese in corn fields  biodiversity  production benefit
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国农业大学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国农业大学学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号