| 酸雨胁迫对番茄叶片细胞膜透性的影响 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 陈文胜,出佳范,吕再辉,黄晓松,徐冰莹,邱栋梁.酸雨胁迫对番茄叶片细胞膜透性的影响[J].福建农业学报,2017,32(4). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 陈文胜 出佳范 吕再辉 黄晓松 徐冰莹 邱栋梁 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 福建农业职业技术学院园艺园林系,福建 福州 350119;福建农林大学园艺学院,福建 福州 350002;2. 福建农林大学园艺学院,福建 福州,350002 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 福建省教育厅访问学者资助项目，福建农林大学科技创新专项基金项目 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 采用番茄品种‘倍盈’为材料,运用人工模拟酸雨研究不同强度酸雨(pH3.0、pH3.5、pH5.6)胁迫对‘倍盈’叶片细胞质膜透性的影响。结果表明:酸雨处理使番茄叶片超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)的活性、丙二醛(MDA)的含量及细胞质膜透性显著上升,可溶性蛋白的含量显著下降。胁迫停止后SOD的活性逐渐下降,停止胁迫后20d,pH3.0与pH3.5处理均显著低于pH5.6(CK);可溶性蛋白的含量pH3.0与pH3.5多呈现波动性的上升,至停止胁迫后15d,pH3.0、pH3.5与pH5.6处理之间无显著差异。丙二醛的含量则呈现波动式上升,停止胁迫后20d,pH3.5与pH5.6差异不显著,而pH3.0显著高于pH5.6;细胞质膜透性pH3.5表现先上升后下降的现象,pH3.0表现下降趋势的现象,但至停止胁迫后20d,pH3.0、pH3.5与pH5.6之间无显著差异;pH值3.0和pH值3.5的叶片伤害率均随时间的延长而呈现下降的趋势,至停止胁迫后10d以后基本处于一个较稳定的水平;从番茄植株的外部形态来看,pH3.0酸雨处理在胁迫停止后20d,仍呈现叶片黄化、枯萎状态,说明pH3.0酸雨胁迫产生不可逆的伤害;而pH3.5酸雨胁迫处理下‘倍盈’表现出较好的自我修复能力。
|
| 关 键 词： | 酸雨胁迫 番茄 细胞质膜透性 SOD 丙二醛 |
Effect of Simulated Acid Rain on Permeability of Tomato Cell Membrane |
| |
| CHEN Wen-sheng,CHU Jia-fan,LV Zai-hui,HUANG Xiao-song,XU Bing-ying,QIU Dong-liang.Effect of Simulated Acid Rain on Permeability of Tomato Cell Membrane[J].Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences,2017,32(4). |
| |
| Authors: | CHEN Wen-sheng CHU Jia-fan LV Zai-hui HUANG Xiao-song XU Bing-ying QIU Dong-liang |
| |
| Abstract: | Effects of simulated acid rain(SiAR) at pH 3.0 and 3.5, along with pH 5.6 (CK), on the membrane permeability of cells in leaves of Brothin tomato were investigated.The results showed that the SOD activity, malondialdehyde (MDA) content, and cell membrane permeability of the tomato leaves increased significantly after SiAR treatments.But, the soluble protein decreased significantly due to the treatments.SOD activity in the leaves declined gradually once the stress was stopped.It became significantly lower than that of control, 20ds after the cessation.MDA content in the leaves treated by pH3.5 SiAR fluctuated with a slight upward trend that was not significantly different from that of control.On the other hand, the pH3.0 treatment produced a significant difference between them after 20ds of removal of the stress.The pH 3.5 treatment caused an initial rise on the membrane permeability and follo wed by a decline, while pH3.0 gave a continual downward trend.However, 20ds after stress stopping, there were no significant differences on the permeability between either of them and control.The soluble protein content in the leaves had an up-and-down insignificant increasing tendency by SiAR treatments in 15 days after the treatment.The injuries on the leaves caused by SiAR declined following the treatments, and reached a constant level 10ds after the stress ceased.Judging by the appearance of the tomato plants, the leaf yellowing and withering persisted 20ds after cessation of the pH3.0 treatment, indicating that an irreversible damage had occurred to the plants by SiAR.In contrast, the tomato plants seemed capable of self-rejuvenation after a SiAR stress at pH3.5. |
| |
| Keywords: | acid rain stress tomato cell membrane permeability superoxide dismutase malondialdehyde |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
