| 多效抗旱驱鼠剂（RPA）飞播油松拌种成效分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李建春,,贺亚东,张斌善,党齐域,夏广东,韩崇选.多效抗旱驱鼠剂（RPA）飞播油松拌种成效分析[J].西北林学院学报,2015,30(6):119-125. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李建春 贺亚东 张斌善 党齐域 夏广东 韩崇选 |
| |
| 作者单位： | （1. 西北农林科技大学 鼠害治理研究中心，陕西 杨陵 712100；2. 陕西省飞机播种造林工作站，陕西 西安 710082；3. 陕西省宁西林业局，陕西 户县 710303；4. 汉中市森林病虫害防治检疫站，陕西 汉中 723000；5. 咸阳市森林病虫害防治检疫站，陕西 咸阳 712000；陕西 汉中 712000；6. 边防大学，陕西 西安 710108） |
| |
| 摘 要： | 选择陕西汉中市、安康市、商州市和淳化县播区1997年飞播油松为对象，1998年-2003年10月，在各播区的多效抗旱驱鼠剂（RPA）处理区和对照区随机抽取50块1 m×2 m样方调查苗木数量，以有苗样方频度、成苗量和增益指数为指标，采用ANOVA-LSD均值检验法和模型分析法，分析RPA和对照油松有苗样方频度和成苗量差异和动态，评价成苗效果，衡量RPA增益效果。按国标判定，RPA处理区第1年有苗样方频度全优，5年后均不合格；对照区第1年，汉中试验区4优、1良，安康试验区3优、2良，商州试验区1优、4良，淳化试验区1优、2良、2合格，3年后均不合格。飞播后第1年RPA和对照的苗木保存量均评定为优；第5年，RPA为优，而对照区汉中试验区的判定为合格，安康、商州和淳化试验区的为不合格。有苗样方频度和和苗木保存量与飞播年限关系均符合Inverse-模型，且RPA模型值明显大于对照；飞播后第1年至第3年有苗样方频度和和苗木保存量减少量占总减少量的85.0%，不宜进行飞播造林成效评估。RPA对有苗样方增益作用淳化最高，地区整体差异极显著（p=0.005）；而对有效苗增益作用相对稳定，地区差异不显著（p=0.395）。
|
| 关 键 词： | 多效抗旱驱鼠剂 飞播造林 油松 有苗样地频度 有效苗量 |
Analysis on the Effectiveness of the Application of RPA in the Aerial Seeding of Pinus tabulaeformis |
| |
| LI Jian-chun,' target="_blank" rel="external">,HE Ya-dong,ZHANG Bin-shan,DANG Qi-yu,XIA Guang-dong,HAN Chong-xuan. Analysis on the Effectiveness of the Application of RPA in the Aerial Seeding of Pinus tabulaeformis [J].Journal of Northwest Forestry University,2015,30(6):119-125. |
| |
| Authors: | LI Jian-chun " target="_blank">' target="_blank" rel="external"> HE Ya-dong ZHANG Bin-shan DANG Qi-yu XIA Guang-dong HAN Chong-xuan |
| |
| Institution: | (1. Research Center of Rodent Pest Management, North-west A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100，China; 2. Shaanxi Work Station of Afforestation by Aerial Seeding, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710082，China; 3. Forest Bureau of Ningxi of Shaanxi, Huxian, Shaanxi 710303，China; 4. Hanzhong Station of Forest Pest Management, Hanzhong, Shaanxi 716000，China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Plantations of Pinus tabulaeformis by aerial seeding afforestation in 1997 located in 4 areas in Shaanxi Province were selected as research objects to examine the effectiveness of RPA, including Hanzhong, Ankang, Shangzhou, and Chunhua. Every October from 1998 to 2003, 50 plots, each with an area of 1 m×2 m were randomly selected in RPA-treated and control compartments, from which indicators such as frequentness of the plots with available seedlings, quantity of the seedlings in the plots, and gained beneficial index were investigated. ANOVA-LSD mean value test method and the model analysis method were used to analyze the differences and dynamics of frequentness of sample plots with available seedling and quantity of available seedling between RPA-treated and control areas. According to the national standard, in RPA test area, the frequentness of sample plots with available seedling in the first year was marked as excellent grade, and those in the fifth year were all unqualified. In Hanzhong, in control area, the frequentness of sample plots with available seedling of 4 plots in the first year were excellent and 1 good, in Ankang 3 were excellent and 2 good, in Shangzhou 1 plot was excellent and 4 good, in Chunhua 1 excellent, 2 good and 2 qualified, all the areas in the third year were not qualified. One year after the aerial seeding, the quantity of available seedling in RAP-treated and control areas was assessed as excellent. Five years after the aerial seeding, the quantity in RPA-treated area was excellent, and in the control area, the quantity in Hanzhong was found to be qualified, Ankang, Shangzhou and Chunhua were found to be unqualified. Relationship between the frequentness of sample plots with available seedling or the quantity of available seedling and aerial seeding age were consistent with the inverse-model, and the value of RPA model was significantly greater than that of the control. In the period of one to three years after the seeding seedling, the frequentness of sample plots with available seedling and the quantity of available seedling reduction accounted for 85.0% of the total reduction, unfavorable to afforestation effect assessment. In Chunhua, the effects of RPA on the gain index of the sample plots with available seedling were the highest, region as a whole compared with the positive group (p=0.005), and the gain effect of available seedling was relatively stable without significant difference among areas (p=0.395). |
| |
| Keywords: | RPA afforestation by aerial seeding Pinus tabulaeformis Pinus tabulaeformis frequentness of sample plots with available seedling quantity of available seedling |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《西北林学院学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《西北林学院学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
