| 地上部与地下部作用对玉米/大豆间作优势的影响 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 吕越,吴普特,陈小莉,王玉宝,赵西宁.地上部与地下部作用对玉米/大豆间作优势的影响[J].农业机械学报,2014,45(1):129-136,142. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 吕越 吴普特 陈小莉 王玉宝 赵西宁 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 西北农林科技大学;中国旱区节水农业研究院;西北农林科技大学;中国旱区节水农业研究院;中国旱区节水农业研究院 |
| |
| 基金项目： | “十二五”国家科技支撑计划资助项目（2011BAD29B09）、高等学校学科创新引智计划（111计划）资助项目（B12007）、西北农林科技大学青年学术骨干项目、基本科研业务费资助项目和旱区农业共性节水技术集成与示范项目（K303021301） |
| |
| 摘 要： | 通过对不同分隔方式下玉米/大豆间作的养分吸收量、光合参数与产量等的测定,分析地上部和地下部的资源竞争作用。试验设置4种间作分隔方式和2种单作处理:地上地下均不分隔(T1),地上地下均分隔(T2),仅地下分隔(T3),仅地上分隔(T4),单作玉米(T5)与单作大豆(T6)。结果表明,对于籽粒产量和生物学产量的土地当量比,T1为1.23和1.20,T2为0.97和0.91,T3为1.01和1.02,T4为1.10和1.08。玉米相对大豆的资源竞争能力,T1为0.79,T2为-0.08,T3为0.14,T4为0.39。玉米相对大豆的氮、磷、钾营养竞争比率,T1为1.63、1.92和1.50,T2为1.05、1.03和1.06,T3为1.28、1.32和1.27,T4为1.47、1.43和1.36。除拔节期外,T1玉米的净光合速率P n、蒸腾速率T r、气孔导度G s与细胞间隙CO2浓度C i最高;T4略低于T1,但差异不显著;T2和T3均显著低于T1;除分枝期外,T1大豆的P n、T r、G s与C i最低;T4略高于T1;T2和T3均显著高于T1。综上所述,对于玉米/大豆的间作优势而言,地上部与地下部的相互作用大于单一因素的作用,其次,地下部作用大于地上部作用。
|
| 关 键 词： | 玉米/大豆间作 地上部作用 地下部作用 |
| 收稿时间： | 2013/7/15 0:00:00 |
Effect of Above-and Below-Ground Interactions on Maize/Soybean Intercropping Advantage |
| |
| Institution: | Northwest A&F University;Institute of Water Saving Agriculture in Arid regions of China;Northwest A&F University;Institute of Water Saving Agriculture in Arid regions of China;Institute of Water Saving Agriculture in Arid regions of China |
| |
| Abstract: | The nutrient uptake, photosynthesis and yield of different separation methods were measured to analyze resource competition from above-and below-ground interaction. The treatments included no shoot or root separation (T1), shoot and root separation (T2), root separation (T3), shoot separation (T4), sole maize (T5) and soybean (T6). The land equivalent ratios of grain yield and biomass were 1.23 and 1.20 for T1, 0.97 and 0.91 for T2, 1.01 and 1.02 for T3, 1.10 and 1.08 for T4, respectively. Competiveness of maize relative to soybean was 0.79 for T1, -0.08 for T2, 0.14 for T3 and 0.39 for T4, respectively. The nutrient competitive ratios of maize relative to soybean were 1.63, 1.92 and 1.50 for T1; 1.05, 1.03 and 1.06 for T2; 1.28, 1.32 and 1.27 for T3; 1.47, 1.43 and 1.36 for T4, respectively. Except the jointing stage, the Pn, Tr, Gs and Ci of maize were the highest for T1; and the values for T4 were the second; and the values for T2 and T3 were remarkable lower than that for T1. Except the branching stage, the parameters of soybean were the lowest for T1, and the values for T2 and T3 were significantly higher than that for T1. In summary, as for maize/soybean intercropping advantages, the interactions of above- and below-ground parts was greater than that under the action of a single factor, and there was greater role from below-ground part than above-ground part. |
| |
| Keywords: | Maize/soybean intercropping Shoot interaction Root interaction |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《农业机械学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《农业机械学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
