|
|||||
|
|
| 麦后水、旱直播稻秸秆还田效果对比试验 | |
| 引用本文： | 谢仁康,谢成林,孔祥英,赵国金,徐德金.麦后水、旱直播稻秸秆还田效果对比试验[J].北方水稻,2010,40(3):33-35. |
| 作者姓名： | 谢仁康 谢成林 孔祥英 赵国金 徐德金 |
| 作者单位： | 1. 仪征市作物栽培技术推广站,江苏,扬州,211400 2. 扬州市农业技术推广站,江苏,扬州,225000 3. 仪征市新城镇农业综合服务中心,江苏,扬州,211401 |
| 基金项目： | 扬州市科技攻关项目，国家粮食丰产科技工程江苏水稻项目 |
| 摘 要： | 通过麦后水、旱直播稻秸秆还田与不还田试验对比,探索麦后水、旱直播稻秸秆还田与不还田之间生长差异及对产量的影响。结果表明,水直播与水直播秸秆还田在出苗与齐苗效果上优于旱直播和旱直播还田,其中,水直播最为优越;在发苗方面,水、旱直播稻在播后的前20d秧苗长势优于水、旱秸秆还田的处理,其中水直播又优于旱直播。从操作简便角度讲,旱直播比水直播省事,便于生产上操作。从水稻生长稳健、稳产角度讲,生产上应选用水直播还田操作方式。 |
| 关 键 词： | 麦后水 旱直播 秸秆还田 效果对比 |
Comparison Trials on Returning Straws to Soil in Dry and Irrigated Direct Sowing Rice Field Following Wheat |
|
| XIE Ren-kang,XIE Cheng-lin,KONG Xiang-ying,ZHAO Guo-jin,XU De-jin.Comparison Trials on Returning Straws to Soil in Dry and Irrigated Direct Sowing Rice Field Following Wheat[J].Reclaiming and Rice Cultivation,2010,40(3):33-35. | |
| Authors: | XIE Ren-kang XIE Cheng-lin KONG Xiang-ying ZHAO Guo-jin XU De-jin |
| Abstract: | The results showed that the seedling emergence rate of irrigated direct sowing and irrigated direct sowing plus returning straws to soils was better than that of dry direct sowing and dry direct sowing plus returning straws to soils.In seedling growth,the irrigated or dry direct sowing was superior to irrigated and dry direct sowing plus returning straws to soils.Dry direct sowing is easier to handle than irrigated direct sowing.The irrigated direct sowing plus returning straws to soils are recommended in the view of stable population development and yield formation of rice. |
| Keywords: | Dry and irrigated direct sowing rice after wheat Returning straw to soil Effect comparison |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ | |