首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

稻虾共作磷素平衡特征及生态经济效益研究
引用本文:刘少君,李文博,熊启中,李虹颖,李军利,刘荣,郜红建,叶新新.稻虾共作磷素平衡特征及生态经济效益研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2021,40(10):2179-2188.
作者姓名:刘少君  李文博  熊启中  李虹颖  李军利  刘荣  郜红建  叶新新
作者单位:农田生态保育与污染防控安徽省重点实验室,安徽农业大学资源与环境学院,合肥 230036;安徽省农业科学院土壤肥料研究所,合肥 230001;安徽六国化工股份有限公司,安徽 铜陵 244021
基金项目:国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFD0301302);国家自然科学基金项目(41701581);安徽省杰出青年科学基金项目(2008085J13);长江经济带磷资源高效利用创新平台项目(KJ20190197)
摘    要:为研究稻虾共作生态系统磷素平衡状况和利用效率,通过田间试验,采用投入产出法,设置3个处理:水稻单作(RM)、稻虾共作投食(RC feed 1)、稻虾共作不投食(RC feed 0),分析了稻虾共作种植模式下水稻产量、磷素平衡状况、利用效率、环境风险以及经济效益。研究结果表明:3种处理水稻产量无显著差异;农田磷平衡均表现为盈余,RC feed 0处理农田磷盈余低于RM和RC feed 1处理;与RM和RC feed 1处理相比较,RC feed 0处理水稻茎叶磷素吸收量显著增加(P0.05),磷素利用率较高。在种植前期(6—8月),RC feed 0处理较RC feed 1处理显著降低了稻田田面水总磷和溶解磷的浓度;在水稻收获时,3个处理间稻田田面水总磷和溶解磷的浓度无显著差异。与RM处理相比较,RC feed 0和RC feed 1处理净收入分别增加了54.22%和51.11%。在综合考虑水稻产量效应、磷素平衡、磷素环境风险和经济效益的条件下,稻虾共作不投食模式是一种资源利用率较高、环境风险较小、经济效益好的种养模式。

关 键 词:稻虾共作  磷平衡  磷循环  经济效益
收稿时间:2021/3/5 0:00:00

Phosphorus balance and eco-economic benefits in the integrated rice-crayfish system
LIU Shaojun,LI Wenbo,XIONG Qizhong,LI Hongying,LI Junli,LIU Rong,GAO Hongjian,YE Xinxin.Phosphorus balance and eco-economic benefits in the integrated rice-crayfish system[J].Journal of Agro-Environment Science( J. Agro-Environ. Sci.),2021,40(10):2179-2188.
Authors:LIU Shaojun  LI Wenbo  XIONG Qizhong  LI Hongying  LI Junli  LIU Rong  GAO Hongjian  YE Xinxin
Institution:Anhui Province Key Farmland Ecological Conservation and Pollution Prevention, School of Resources and Environment, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China;Institute of Soil and Fertilizer, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hefei 230001, China;Anhui Liuguo Chemical Industry, Tongling 244021, China
Abstract:Recently, the rice-crayfish system has developed rapidly in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River in China. The integrated rice-crayfish system is an emerging complex ecological system for planting and breeding in this region. The study of P balance and P use efficiency in the integrated rice-crayfish system is of great significance to systematically guide P management, optimize the rice-crayfish symbiosis system, and to assess the environmental and economic benefits. In this study, a field experiment was conducted and included three treatments:rice monoculture system(RM), rice-crayfish with feed(RC feed 1), and rice-crayfish without feed(RC feed 0). The rice yield, P balance, P use efficiency, and economic and ecological benefits of the integrated rice-crayfish system were then analyzed. The results showed that there were no significant differences in rice yield across treatments, and the P balance of all three treatments in the farmland system were in surplus. The P surplus in the RC feed 0 treatment was lower than that in the RM and RC feed 1 treatments. The P uptake efficiency and P accumulation in the stems and leaves of rice in the RC feed 0 treatment were significantly(P<0.05) higher than those in the RM and RC feed 1 treatments. In the early stage(from June to August), the RC feed 0 treatment significantly reduced the total P(TP) and dissolved P(DP) concentrations in the surface water, compared with the RM and RC feed 1 treatments. There were no significant differences in TP and DP concentrations at the harvest stage. Compared with the RM treatment, RC feed 0 and RC feed 1 treatments increased net revenue by 54.22% and 51.11%, respectively. Considering rice yield, P surplus, and environmental effects, the integrated rice-crayfish system without feed is a suitable alternative for rice crop systems in this area and could be a recommended model for this region due to the high utilization efficiency of resources, low environmental risk, and good economic benefits.
Keywords:integrated rice-crayfish system  phosphorus balance  phosphorus cycle  economic benefits
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《农业环境科学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《农业环境科学学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号