| 犬第三眼睑增生切除法与包埋法治疗效果的比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 陶田谷晟,李思远,秦建辉,濮兴杰,李晓鹏,肖啸.犬第三眼睑增生切除法与包埋法治疗效果的比较[J].中国畜牧兽医,2014,41(11):287-290. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 陶田谷晟 李思远 秦建辉 濮兴杰 李晓鹏 肖啸 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 云南农业大学动物科学技术学院, 云南昆明 650201;2. 德宏州盈江县畜牧兽医局, 云南德宏 679300;3. 云南农业大学动物医院, 云南昆明 650031 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 云南省高端科技人才引进计划项目子项目(2009C1125-5)。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 犬第三眼睑增生是由于腺体肥大等原因与瞬膜一起从眼内向外翻转而发生炎症的一种眼病,多采用切除法与包埋法进行治疗。为研究犬第三眼睑增生切除法与包埋法的利弊,本试验将20只双眼患第三眼睑增生且不患其他疾病的犬分为切除组和包埋组,进行手术并跟踪观察比较治疗效果。结果显示,切除法具有手术简便、恢复时间短等优势,但患犬治愈后会有干眼病等后遗症发生,对犬的健康有极大危害;而包埋法虽然手术复杂,恢复时间较长,但只要能熟练的操作也能达到治愈效果,且对患犬不会产生其他不良影响。结果表明,虽然2种手法各有利弊,但切除法的弊大于利,后遗症会带给犬更多的不便;而包埋法的利大于弊,只要能熟练掌握手术方法,做好术后的护理,就可以克服弊端。建议在今后的临床中应尽量的建议前来就诊的畜主使用包埋法对第三眼睑增生进行治疗。
|
| 关 键 词： | 犬 第三眼睑增生 切除法 包埋法 比较 |
| 收稿时间： | 2014-05-14 |
Comparison of the Treatment Effect of Excision Method and Embedding Method for Canine Third Eyelid Hyperplasia |
| |
| TAO Tian-gu-sheng,LI Si-yuan,QIN Jian-hui,PU Xing-jie,LI Xiao-peng,XIAO Xiao.Comparison of the Treatment Effect of Excision Method and Embedding Method for Canine Third Eyelid Hyperplasia[J].China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine,2014,41(11):287-290. |
| |
| Authors: | TAO Tian-gu-sheng LI Si-yuan QIN Jian-hui PU Xing-jie LI Xiao-peng XIAO Xiao |
| |
| Institution: | 1. College of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China;2. Bureau of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine in Yingjiang County of Dehong Prefecture, Dehong 679300, China;3. Veterinary Hospital of Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650031, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Canine third eyelid hyperplasia was an ophthalmopathy, because of gland hypertrophy and other reasons with the nictitating membrane together from the eye turned outwards and induced inflammation, most of which were treated by excision method and embedding method. In order to research the advantages and disadvantages of excision method and embedding method for canine third eyelid hyperplasia, we used 20 dogs which both eyes had third eyelid hyperplasia and not suffer from other diseases, and divided into excision group and embedding group to do operation and track observation. The results showed that the excision method had simple operation,recovery time was short and other advantages, but the dogs would have the sequelae, dry eye disease after curement, there was great harm to their health. While embedding method's operation was complex, recovery time was longer, but as long as the operators mastered skilled operation, the cure effect could also be achieved, and would not have other bad effect on the dog. Although the two methods had their advantages and disadvantages, the disadvantages of excision method outweighed its advantages, sequelae would bring dogs more inconvenience, and embedding method had more advantages than disadvantages, as long as they could master the operation method,do well postoperative nurse, and overcome the drawbacks. In future clinical practice, we should try to persuade the dog's owner to use embedding method to treat the third eyelid hyperplasia. |
| |
| Keywords: | canine third eyelid hyperplasia excision method embedding method comparison |
|
| 点击此处可从《中国畜牧兽医》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《中国畜牧兽医》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
