Stability Evaluation of Mixed Food Waste Composts |
| |
| Authors: | Teresa L Matteson Dan M Sullivan |
| |
| Institution: | Department of Crop and Soil Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon |
| |
| Abstract: | As interest in food waste composting grows, so does the need for proven composting methods. Stability testing has been proposed as a compost quality assurance tool. We conducted this study to: (i) to evaluate the efficacy of simple outdoor composting methods in producing a compost with a low, stable decomposition rate, and (ii) to determine the reliability of simple, 4-h compost stability evaluation methods. Composting was conducted outdoors in winter and spring in Eugene, Oregon without moisture addition. Mixed food waste was combined with screened dairy solids and ground yard trimmings. Sawdust was used to cover windrows for the first 27 d of composting. Compost windrow temperatures remained above 55°C for 30+ d. Carbon dioxide evolved with several 4-h test methods was strongly correlated (r2 > 0.7) with CO2 evolved using a 48-h test. A limited-turn windrow (LTW) composting system produced compost with slightly greater stability than a passively aerated windrow (PAW) composting system. Food waste compost samples had a low CO2 evolution rate after 71 to 99 d using either composting system. Compost CO2 evolution rate at 25°C decreased with composting time, reaching approximately 1 to 4 mg CO2-C g compost C?1 d?1 for the PAW method and 0.5 to 2 mg CO2-C g compost C?1 d?1 for the LTW method. Putrescible organic matter in food waste was effectively decomposed in outdoor windrows using composting methods that did not employ forced aeration, self-propelled windrow turners, or manufactured composting vessels. Several 4-h stability tests showed promise for implementation as quality assurance tools. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
