| 农村产业融合的多功能绩效评价与障碍因子分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 方相,杨钢桥,黄丹.农村产业融合的多功能绩效评价与障碍因子分析[J].浙江农业学报,2021,33(5):932. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 方相 杨钢桥 黄丹 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 华中农业大学 公共管理学院,湖北 武汉 430070 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然科学基金(71503091);国家自然科学基金(71904150) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 农村产业融合的实质就是拓展农业多功能,从多功能视角来研究农村产业融合的绩效与障碍因子,可为农村产业融合发展提供科学依据。基于农村产业融合经营模式,从过程与结果2个维度构建农村产业融合的多功能绩效评价指标体系,采用熵权TOPSIS法和障碍度模型,以湖北省4个典型案例村为代表,分别表征4种农村产业融合经营模式(模式Ⅰ,农户独立经营模式;模式Ⅱ,农业企业/合作社规模化经营模式;模式Ⅲ-A,“农业企业+合作社+农户”中介组织联动型经营模式;模式Ⅲ-B,“农业企业+合作社+农户”一体化经营模式),对其进行调查分析,评价其农村产业融合的多功能绩效与障碍因子。结果显示:不同农村产业融合经营模式的多功能绩效存在差异,相较于模式Ⅱ,农户协作经营模式(含模式Ⅲ-A和模式Ⅲ-B)的多功能绩效水平较高,其中模式Ⅲ-B的多功能绩效水平更高。不同农村产业融合经营模式的多功能绩效障碍因子不同。模式Ⅰ和模式Ⅱ目前主要以农村休闲观光旅游为主导产业,影响其多功能绩效的障碍因子主要集中在农业生产、加工业生产、生态系统服务方面;模式Ⅲ-A和模式Ⅲ-B目前主要以农业、加工业为主导产业,影响其多功能绩效的障碍因子主要集中在旅游服务等非农生产活动方面。结果表明:为了提高不同农村产业融合经营模式的多功能绩效,应引导农业企业、合作社与农户建立稳定的利益联结机制,注重多功能协调,因地制宜地发展农村产业。
|
| 关 键 词： | 农村产业融合 多功能绩效 障碍因子 |
| 收稿时间： | 2020-09-22 |
Multifunctional performance evaluation and obstacle factor analysis of rural industrial convergence |
| |
| FANG Xiang,YANG Gangqiao,HUANG Dan.Multifunctional performance evaluation and obstacle factor analysis of rural industrial convergence[J].Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis,2021,33(5):932. |
| |
| Authors: | FANG Xiang YANG Gangqiao HUANG Dan |
| |
| Institution: | College of Public Administration, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China |
| |
| Abstract: | The essence of rural industrial convergence is to extend the multi-function of agriculture. Analysis into the performance and obstacle factors of rural industrial convergence from the perspective of multi-function of agriculture can provide scientific basis for rural industry development. In the present work, an evaluation system for the multifunctional performance of rural industrial convergence was constructed from the two dimensions of process and result. Based on the survey data collected from 4 typical cases in Hubei Province, which represented 4 business modes of rural industrial convergence (mode Ⅰ, farmer independent business modes; mode Ⅱ, agricultural enterprises/cooperatives business mode; mode Ⅲ-A, “agricultural enterprises+cooperatives+farmers” intermediary mode; Ⅲ-B, “agricultural enterprises+cooperatives+farmers” integrated mode), an empirical study was conducted to analyze the performance and obstacle factors of rural industrial convergence by using TOPSIS method and obstacle degree model. It was shown that there were differences in the multifunctional performance of different business modes of rural industrial convergence. Generally speaking, the “agricultural enterprise+cooperative+farmers” mode (including mode Ⅲ-A and mode Ⅲ-B) had higher performance level than that of mode Ⅱ. More specifically, mode Ⅲ-B had the higher performance level than that of mode Ⅲ-A. Different business modes of rural industrial convergence had different obstacle factors. Mode Ⅰ and mode Ⅱ mainly took rural leisure tourism as the leading industry, and the main obstacle factors affecting multifunctional performance concentrated on agricultural production, processing industry production, and ecosystem services. Mode Ⅲ-A and mode Ⅲ-B mainly took agriculture and processing industry as the leading industry, and the main obstacle factors affecting multifunctional performance were non-agricultural production activities such as tourism services. In order to improve the multifunctional performance of different business modes of rural industrial convergence, agricultural enterprises, agricultural cooperatives and farmers should be guided to establish a stable interest linkage mechanism, focus on multifunctional coordination and develop rural industries in accordance with local conditions. |
| |
| Keywords: | rural industrial convergence multifunctional performance obstacle factor |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《浙江农业学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《浙江农业学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
