首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Empirical evaluation of the strength of interspecific competition in shaping small mammal communities in fragmented landscapes
Authors:Giulia Sozio  Alessio Mortelliti
Institution:1.Department of Biology and Biotechnology ‘Charles Darwin’,Sapienza University of Rome,Rome,Italy;2.Fenner School of Environment and Society, Australian Research Council Centre for Environmental Decisions, National Environmental Research Program,The Australian National University,Canberra,Australia;3.Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Conservation Biology,University of Maine,Orono,USA
Abstract:

Context

Theory predicts that habitat loss and fragmentation may have drastic consequences on species’ interactions. To date, however, little empirical evidence exists on the strength of interspecific competition in shaping animal communities in fragmented landscapes.

Objectives

Our aim was to measure the degree of ongoing competitive interference between species in fragmented landscapes. Our model system was the community of ground-dwelling rodents in deciduous woodlands in central Italy, composed of a habitat generalist species (Apodemus sylvaticus) and two forest specialists (Apodemus flavicollis and Myodes glareolus). Our objectives were to test whether species were segregated among forest patches and whether spatial segregation was determined by interspecific competition or habitat and resource availability.

Methods

We surveyed the populations inhabiting 29 woodland patches in a highly fragmented landscape using a capture-mark-recapture protocol, capturing >4500 individuals. First we modelled species’ distribution as a function of habitat, resource availability and landscape variables. The second stage of our analyses involved measuring the response of vital rate parameters (body mass, reproduction, survival, recruitment, population density) to competitor density.

Results

The relative distribution of species reflected a spatial segregation of habitat generalists and specialists according to habitat quality, cover and connectivity. Interspecific competition mainly affected individual level vital rates, whereas we found no substantial effects at the population level.

Conclusions

Competitive exclusion of specialist species by generalist species was occurring. However, when compared to other factors such as habitat connectivity and resource availability, interspecific competition played a relatively minor role in shaping the studied community.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号