首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

甜樱桃果实发育过程中细胞壁组分及其降解酶活性的变化
引用本文:沈颖,李芳东,王玉霞,张序,李延菊,赵慧,张福兴.甜樱桃果实发育过程中细胞壁组分及其降解酶活性的变化[J].果树学报,2020(5):677-686.
作者姓名:沈颖  李芳东  王玉霞  张序  李延菊  赵慧  张福兴
作者单位:山东省烟台市农业科学研究院;烟台大学生命科学学院
基金项目:烟台市重点研发计划(2017NC071);山东省水果创新团队(SDAIT-06-02);烟台市科技计划(2019MSGY115)。
摘    要:【目的】了解甜樱桃在果实发育过程中质地变化与果实细胞壁组分及其降解酶活性的关系。【方法】以硬肉型品种‘美早’、常规型品种‘红灯’和软肉型品种‘佳红’为试材,分别在硬核期、转白期、着色期和成熟期对果实硬度、细胞壁组分以及细胞壁降解酶活性进行了测定分析。【结果】‘美早’硬度降低速率较慢,成熟期硬度高于其他2个品种,WSP升高速率、纤维素降解速率低,PME、α-L-Af、Cx、β-Gal活性低。‘红灯’硬度降低速率较快,在果实发育后期硬度低于‘美早’,WSP升高速率与纤维素降解速率高,PME、α-L-Af活性高。‘佳红’在转白期硬度迅速降低且后期质地软,它的纤维素降解速率高,PME、α-L-Af、Cx、β-Gal在转白期之后活性较高。【结论】甜樱桃果实成熟过程中,原果胶的降解和纤维素的水解是果实软化的关键因素。果实细胞壁组分降解是多种酶协同作用的结果。PME和α-L-Af与‘红灯’和‘佳红’硬度显著负相关,并且活性在‘美早’中显著低于其他2个品种,这可能是果实硬度较高的主要原因。纤维素和原果胶降解速率低,PG活性高和β-Gal活性低可能是导致硬度高的次要原因。Cx酶活由于在‘红灯’中并没有显著影响到到果实硬度,而在‘佳红’和‘美早’中产生了不同的影响,可能是品种间的差别。

关 键 词:甜樱桃  硬度  细胞壁组分  细胞壁降解酶

A study on the variation of cell wall components and activities of their degradation enzymes in sweet cherry during fruit development
SHEN Ying,LI Fangdong,WANG Yuxia,ZHANG Xu,LI Yanju,ZHAO Hui,ZHANG Fuxing.A study on the variation of cell wall components and activities of their degradation enzymes in sweet cherry during fruit development[J].Journal of Fruit Science,2020(5):677-686.
Authors:SHEN Ying  LI Fangdong  WANG Yuxia  ZHANG Xu  LI Yanju  ZHAO Hui  ZHANG Fuxing
Institution:(Yantai Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Yantai 265500,Shandong,China;College of Life Sciences,Yantai University,Yantai 264005,Shandong,China)
Abstract:【Objective】The study was conducted to understand the relationship between the texture changes of sweet cherry and changes in cell wall components and their degrading enzyme activities during fruit ripening.【Methods】Sweet cherry trees of three cultivars, including the hard meat-type‘Tieton’, the conventional type‘Hongdeng’and the soft meat-type‘Jiahong’, cultivated in a 12-yearold open orchard were used as the experiment materials. Samples were collected during core hardening,color-break(whitening), coloring, and full maturity to determine the fruit firmness, cell wall components, and the activities of cell wall degrading enzyme.【Results】‘Hongdeng’fruit was harder than the other two varieties in the early stage of fruit development, but the range of decline was large during the later stages.‘Jiahong’had the lowest hardness after color-break. With the development of the fruit, the hardness difference between the three varieties gradually decreased, and there was no significant difference between the them at full maturity, but the fruit hardness of‘Tieton’was higher than the other two varieties. The WSP content of the three varieties gradually increased from core hardening to colorbreak, and decreased or remained stable after the coloring period. The WSP content in‘Hongdeng’increased from the core hardening stage to the coloring stage(189.49%), while‘Tieton’WSP content increased by 43.60%. The WSP content of the three varieties was negatively correlated with hardness.The ISP content in the three varieties decreased first and then increased, rapid decreases in both ISP content and hardness were found during color-break. The ISP content peaked during core-hardening, after which the content decreased significantly in the three cultivars. During the fruit development, the difference gradually decreased. The CSP content in‘Tieton’and‘Hongdeng’decreased after color-break,while that in‘Jiahong’declined after the coloring period. Among them,‘Hongdeng’had the highest rate of decline(45.08%) with an increase towards full maturity. The change pattern was opposite to that of WSP. As the fruit matured, cellulose content in‘Hongdeng’and‘Jiahong’was significantly reduced, which was significantly lower than that in‘Tieton’in all periods. For‘Tieton’, there was no significant change in cellulose content from core hardening to fruit coloring. Although its cellulose content dropped significantly during maturation, it was still significantly higher than that in the other two varieties. The hemicellulose content of the three varieties showed a gradual decline during fruit development,and‘Tieton’and‘Hongdeng’had a higher content than that in‘Jiahong’. From color-break to the coloring period, hemicellulose content gradually decreased till full maturity when it had no significant difference. The activity of PG of the three varieties increased at the beginning, then remained stable or slightly decreased. The increase rate of PG activity in‘Tieton’was the highest(110.56%), and it peaked during coloration in‘Tieton’and‘Hongdeng’. During the coloration and maturation periods,the activity of PG in‘Tieton’,‘Hongdeng’and‘Jiahong’decreased in turn and differed significantly.PME activity peaked during core Ihardening.‘Hongdeng’had a significantly higher PME activity than‘Tieton’and‘Jiahong’.‘Jiahong’showed no significant difference in PME activity during the four stages, while in the‘Hongdeng’, a significant decrease occurred from core hardening to color break. In‘Tieton’, the activity of PME decreased significantly from core hardening stage to coloration stage.The PL activity in the three varieties fluctuated with time and had no correlation with fruit firmness.The α-L-Af activity in the three varieties was the lowest during core hardening, and‘Tieton’had a significantly higher α-L-Af activity than the other two varieties. During fruit development, the activity ofα-L-Af in‘Tieton’was the smallest, however, the rate of rise in‘Jiahong’was the largest. The activity of the enzyme in‘Hongdeng’rose to 392 nmol · g^-1· min^-1 during the maturation period, which was significantly higher than those in the other two varieties. The β-Gal activity of the three varieties was very low in the core hardening stage, and then, there was an upward trend. Among them,‘Tieton’had a lowest rate of increase,‘Hongdeng’had a highest rate of increase. In‘Jiahong’, a significant increase in enzyme activity was found and then the activity maintained high. The Cx activity of the three varieties showed an upward trend, but the growth rate in‘Tieton’and‘Jiahong’was higher than that in‘Hongdeng’. The difference in fruit development gradually increased. During the maturation period, the activity of this enzyme in‘Jiahong’continued to rise and became significantly higher than that in‘Tieton’and‘Hongdeng’. During the fruit development of‘Tieton’, the change in hardness was significantly positively correlated with Cx. Fo‘Hongdeng’, the change in hardness was positively correlated with the change in hemicellulose and cellulose contents, but the activities of α-L-Af, β-Gal and PME were significantly negatively correlated. During the development of‘Jiahong’fruit, fruit hardness was significantly negatively correlated with WSP content and the activities of Cx, α-L-Af, and PME.【Conclusion】During the ripening of sweet cherry fruit, the degradation of protopectin and the hydrolysis of cellulose are the key factors for fruit softening. The degradation of fruit cell wall components is the result of a synergistic effect of multiple enzymes. The lower activities of PME and α-L-Af in‘Tieton’than that of the other two varieties might be the main reason for its higher fruit hardness. The low degradation rates of cellulose and protopectin, high PG activity and low β-Gal activity might be secondary causes for its high hardness. The Cx enzyme seems to have different effects in‘Jiahong’and‘Tieton’and seems not significantly affect the fruit hardness in‘Hongdeng’, which might be the difference between these varieties.
Keywords:Sweet cherry  Hardness  Cell wall components  Cell wall degradation enzymes
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号