Manipulation of Domestic Animal Embryos and Implications for Development |
| |
| Authors: | TG McEvoy |
| |
| Institution: | Scottish Agricultural College, Animal Biology Division, Aberdeen, UK |
| |
| Abstract: | Assisted reproductive technologies, as applied to domestic animals, can exert both novel and wide‐ranging influences on the development, viability and welfare of offspring. Some of the changes are evident immediately or soon after the time at which a manipulative procedure is carried out, while other changes may not be evident until later in development or, perhaps, may remain undetected throughout an animal's lifetime. The present review explores some of the consequences – in terms of foetal, placental, neonatal and post‐natal effects – of exposing embryos of cattle, sheep and other species to in vitro culture per se or, during culture, to physically invasive technologies including gene injection and nuclear transfer. The innate sensitivity of oocytes and recently fertilized eggs to their in vitro environment is illustrated by an examination of the later developmental repercussions resulting from apparently innocuous choices related to in vitro culture medium formulations. In contrast, an inherent resilience and paradoxical readiness to resume development following the traumas of nuclear transfer procedures is also in evidence. The extent to which assisted reproductive technologies will succeed, where relevant, in the domestic animal sector will be influenced by our appreciation of embryo requirements, for both short‐ and long‐term developmental fitness, during their earliest developmental stages. Evidence of species‐specific needs is testimony to the challenges ahead. Ultimately, our ability and inclination to resolve the limitations associated with current procedures will probably be greatly enhanced if predictive indicators (genetic, epigenetic or functional markers) of later developmental fitness can be identified. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
