| 原状土冲刷法与人工模拟降雨法研究土壤抗冲性对比分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘国彬,张光辉.原状土冲刷法与人工模拟降雨法研究土壤抗冲性对比分析[J].水土保持通报,1996,16(2):32-37. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘国彬 张光辉 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所;中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 在相同条件下，对比研究了人工模拟降雨小区和用大型抗冲槽测定的土壤侵蚀量、产沙过程及抗冲性异同。
|
| 关 键 词： | 原状土冲刷法 抗冲性 侵蚀量估测 |
| 收稿时间： | 4/1/1995 12:00:00 AM |
Comparison Anal ysis on Soil Anti-scourabil ity Between Undisturbed Sampling and Artificial Rainfall Plot |
| |
| Liu Guo-bin and Zhang Guang-hui.Comparison Anal ysis on Soil Anti-scourabil ity Between Undisturbed Sampling and Artificial Rainfall Plot[J].Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,1996,16(2):32-37. |
| |
| Authors: | Liu Guo-bin and Zhang Guang-hui |
| |
| Institution: | Instituteof Soil and Water Conservation. Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources.712100.Yangling District. Xianyang Municipality. Shaanxi Pravince;Instituteof Soil and Water Conservation. Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources.712100.Yangling District. Xianyang Municipality. Shaanxi Pravince |
| |
| Abstract: | The soil loss.sediment yield and process as well as soil anti-scourability were tested on field artificial runoff plot and undisturbed soil sampling(lOcmX20cmXlOcm)under the same conditions.The result showed that soil sample washing method was 200-400times of soil loss
than in the runoff plot in 15 minutes with rainfall of 0.65 and 0.84 mm/min.The erosion process in soil sample washing was different from in runoff plot.The runoff depth in former was 50~150 times and erosion modules was 5-7times(bare land)and 1.8-4.5 times(pasture)of in runoff plot.The reason of such difference was analysised.It was also found that there exited relation of sediment yield between samples of large size(lOcmX20cm XlOcm)and small size(3.5cm X 20cm X 4cm), and sediment yield in former can be estimated by small one. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《水土保持通报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《水土保持通报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
