Evaluation and validation of a commercial ELISA for diazinon in surface waters |
| |
| Authors: | Sullivan J J Goh K S |
| |
| Institution: | Department of Land, Air, and Water Resources, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA. |
| |
| Abstract: | The performance of a commercially available microtiter plate ELISA kit for the determination of diazinon was evaluated for sensitivity, selectivity, intra-assay repeatability, accuracy, and matrix effects in fortified distilled water and filtered and unfiltered environmental surface water samples. Repeatability and reproducibility studies show that the kit satisfies current EPA criteria for the assessment of analytical methods. Mean recoveries from spiked samples averaged 80.3, 95.5, and 103.5% from distilled, unfiltered surface, and filtered surface waters, respectively. The experimentally determined method detection limit (MDL) for the commercial diazinon microtiter plate format (0.0159 microg L(-)(1)) was comparable to the least detectable dose (LDD) established by the manufacturer (0.022 microg L(-)(1)). Specificity studies indicate that the diazinon polyclonal antibody can readily distinguish the target compound from other structurally similar organophosphorus analogues, with the exception of diazoxon. Cross-reactivity with the oxon was approximately 29%, while reactivity with pirimiphos-methyl, pirimiphos-ethyl, and chlorpyrifos-ethyl was negligible. A slight matrix effect was discovered to be present in both filtered and unfiltered environmental water matrixes, but its effect on the immunoassays is insignificant within experimental error. For validation of the microtiter plate ELISA format, environmental surface and storm runoff water samples were collected, split, and analyzed directly by ELISA and by liquid-liquid extraction followed by GC (California State Department of Food and Agriculture method EM 46.0). Results of the two analytical methods were then compared statistically. A close correlation was found between methods for unspiked and untreated river water samples (r = 0.969) while a much less robust correlation was obtained for runoff waters (r = 0.728). Results from runoff waters exhibit a particularly high positive bias for the ELISA method relative to the GC method. Cross-reactivity of diazoxon and probably other unidentified cross-reacting components may be responsible for the exaggerated account of the target analyte in surface and runoff waters. While excellent for screening purposes, further study is required to elucidate and quantify the factors responsible for the consistent overestimation of ELISA results before the kit can be employed routinely for regulatory compliance monitoring. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录！ |
|
