A comparison of 12‐ and 19‐week CHOP protocols using non‐randomized,contemporaneous controls |
| |
| Authors: | Nathaniel Vos MacKenzie Pellin David M Vail |
| |
| Abstract: | This study is a concurrent comparison of two versions of CHOP protocols, a 19‐week CHOP and a comparatively overall dose‐intense 12‐week CHOP. The 12‐week protocol was designed to be 58% more dose intense than the 19‐week protocol for both doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide; however, it was 21% less dose intense for vincristine (VCR). Forty‐seven dogs were included for evaluation, and the characteristics of each population were similar. For dogs receiving the 19‐week CHOP protocol, 89.5% experienced a complete response, with a median progression‐free survival (PFS) of 245 days and median overall survival (OS) of 347 days. For dogs receiving the 12‐week CHOP protocol, 89.3% experienced a complete response, with a median PFS of 141 days and median OS of 229 days. When evaluated by Log‐rank analysis, the difference of PFS (P = 0.047) and OS (P = 0.013) between the groups were statistically significant. In summary, these data suggest that despite overall increased dose‐intensity, dogs receiving treatment with a 12‐week CHOP protocol experience less durable remission than our standard 19‐week protocol in this population. Additional prospective investigation will be required to explore the implication that VCR dose intensity and/or shorter overall temporal drug exposure in this protocol may result in diminished efficacy. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
