Optimum duration of performance tests for evaluating growing pigs for growth and feed efficiency traits |
| |
| Authors: | Arthur P F Barchia I M Giles L R |
| |
| Institution: | New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Elizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institute, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia. paul.arthur@dpi.nsw.gov.au |
| |
| Abstract: | The optimum duration of test for the measurement of ADG, ADFI, feed:gain ratio which is the reciprocal of the efficiency of gain (G:F) and therefore increases as the efficiency of gain decrease and vice versa], and residual feed intake was examined in growing pigs. Data from 144 hybrid (mainly Large White x Landrace) pigs involved in a longitudinal (n = 54) and serial slaughter (n = 90) experiment were used. The pigs were housed in individual pens from 70 +/- 1 d of age (mean +/- SD) and fed ad libitum a pelleted commercial diet. Feed intake and BW data on pigs that had a minimum of 10-wk records were partitioned into a 14-d adjustment and a 56-d test period. Phenotypic correlations among weekly measurements were used to examine the repeatability of each trait. Changes in phenotypic residual variance and correlation using shortened (7-, 14-, 21-, 28-, 35-, 42-, and 49-d) tests compared with the full-length 56-d test were used as criteria to assess the optimum test duration. The results of the phenotypic correlations among weekly measurements indicated that ADFI, which was characterized by moderate to high correlations (0.41 to 0.81), was more repeatable than ADG, which was characterized by low correlations (0.00 to 0.43). Mean gut fill (n = 107) was 4.2% of BW but was characterized by large variation among the pigs (SD = 1.8; CV = 42.2%). This variation in gut fill was a major contributor to the low repeatability of the measurement of ADG. These repeatability results indicated that ADG, rather than ADFI, will determine the optimum duration of test for the feed efficiency traits. The results of the shortened relative to the full-length test indicate that for growing pigs under good nutrition and ad libitum feeding, a 28-d test was adequate for the measurement of feed intake, whereas a 35-d test was required to measure ADG, feed:gain ratio, and residual feed intake without compromising the accuracy of measurement. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录！ |
|
