Response of three cereal crops in continuous arable or ley-arable rotations to fertilizer nitrogen and soil nitrogen at Rothamsted's Woburn Ley-arable experiment |
| |
| Authors: | Paul Richard Poulton Arthur Edward Johnston Rodger Paul White |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Sustainable Soils and Crops Department, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, UK;2. Intelligent Data Ecosystems, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, UK |
| |
| Abstract: | Rothamsted's Woburn Ley-arable experiment, started in 1938 on a sandy loam soil, provides valuable real-world data on the effects of all-arable and ley-arable rotations. In this study, six rotations were compared from 1973 to 2001. Two had 3-year arable “treatment” crops, two had 3-year leys, and two had 8-year leys; the leys being all-grass given fertilizer nitrogen (Ln3 and Ln8), or grass/clover (Lc3 and Lc8). Here, we present the yields of two test crops, winter wheat (1981–2000) followed by spring barley (1982–1991) or winter rye (1997–2001) in each of the six rotations, and their response to four rates of fertilizer N and soil N. From fitted yield/N response curves, we show that maximum wheat yields were least (7.10 t ha?1) in the AB rotation, slightly higher, but not significantly so (7.65 t ha?1) following Ln leys but significantly higher (8.12 t ha?1) following Lc leys. Significantly less fertilizer N (30 kg ha?1) was needed to achieve the higher yields following Lc leys. Yields of the second cereal following the leys were 0.3–0.8 t ha?1 higher than those in the AB rotation; these increases were not statistically significant. However, significantly less fertilizer N, 26–38 kg N ha?1, was required to achieve those yields. There was no difference found between the type of ley. The initial benefit of the Lc leys was short-lived. If leys are to be introduced into mainly arable farming systems, they may need to be subsidized to make them financially viable. |
| |
| Keywords: | Cereal crops fertilization ley-arable rotations soil N SOM |
|
|
