Motility Assessment of Porcine Spermatozoa: a Comparison of Methods |
| |
| Authors: | P Vyt D Maes T Rijsselaere E Dejonckheere F Castryck A Van Soom |
| |
| Institution: | Animal Health Care Flanders, Torhout, Belgium. phillip.vyt@dgz.be |
| |
| Abstract: | Although widely used in practice, visual motility assessment of boar spermatozoa is a very subjective method. The aim of this study was to compare the visual motility assessment of boar spermatozoa with two objective, automated systems, namely the Sperm Quality Analyzer (SQA-IIC) and the Hamilton-Thorne computer-based semen analyzer (HTR). In addition, concentrations as determined by the Burker counting chamber and HTR were compared. Motility of 30 semen samples from 30 different boars (22 Pietrain, seven Landrace boars and one Large White) was examined during three consecutive days, subjectively by two independent persons (visual motility assessment) and objectively with both automated systems. The use of the SQA-IIC and HTR for assessing boar sperm motility was evaluated and the repeatability of the measurements was estimated. The Sperm Motility Index (SMI), determined by SQA-IIC, and the percentage motile spermatozoa determined by the HTR showed a good correlation (r=0.71; p <0.05). The visual examination performed by Person 2 showed a good correlation with the SMI (r=0.81) and with the percentage of motile spermatozoa measured by the HTR (r=0.66) (p <0.05). There was a very poor correlation and a limited agreement between the visual assessments of both persons emphasizing the subjectivity of visual motility assessment. Nevertheless, motility scores of each person during the three consecutive days were highly correlated (r=0.67 and 0.72, p <0.05). The limits of agreement plots showed poor agreement between both persons and the HTR. The repeatability of measurements for most parameters evaluated by the HTR and by the SQA-IIC was good with coefficients of variation below 10%. In addition, for fertile Pietrain boars (n=22), reference values for the different HTR-parameters are presented showing a high curvilinear velocity (157.3 +/- 19.5 microm/s) and a low straightness and linearity of the movement of the spermatozoa (62.7 +/- 8.7 and 35.5 +/- 7.6%, respectively). Concentration as determined by the Burker counting chamber (56.0 +/- 16.8 x 10(6)/ml) was significantly higher compared with HTR measurement (37.6 +/- 7.7 x 10(6)/ml). The high number of counted cells and the low variation render the HTR concentration measurement more reliable. It can be concluded that visual motility assessment is highly subjective and should therefore be replaced by automated systems that allow for a more objective and detailed motility assessment of boar spermatozoa. In addition, based on the present results, highly repeatable results were obtained by the SQA-IIC and especially by the HTR. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
