Intensive Grazing Management of Smooth Bromegrass With or Without Alfalfa or Birdsfoot Trefoil: Heifer Performance and Sward Characteristics |
| |
| Institution: | 2. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824;1. Departamento de Biociência Única de Saúde, Setor de Clínica e Cirurgia de Grandes Animais, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), Curitibanos, Santa Catarina, Brazil;2. Departamento de Clínica de Grandes Animais, Hospital Veterinário Universitário (HVU), Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil;3. Universidade Federal do Pampa (UNIPAMPA), Hospital Veterinário Universitário, Uruguaiana, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil;4. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), Curitibanos, Santa Catarina, Brazil;5. Departamento de Patologia Veterinária, Hospital Veterinário Universitrário (HVU), Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil;1. Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, 416F Agriculture/Forestry center, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada;2. Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 33 Ursula Franklin St, Toronto, ON M5S 2S1, Canada |
| |
| Abstract: | Over 3 yr, 324 (n=108 per yr) Holstein heifers (226±26 kg; ±SD) ranging in age from 5 to 7 mo were assigned to a 3×2 factorial arrangement of treatments to determine the effects of forage and grazing management system on animal performance, forage availability, and forage quality. The forage treatments were: 1) alfalfa and smooth bromegrass (ALF-BR), 2) birdsfoot trefoil and smooth bromegrass (BFT-BR), or 3) smooth bromegrass plus nitrogen (BR). The grazing management systems were: 1) a four-paddock system in which cattle were rotated based on time (4-p) or 2) a 12-paddock system in which cattle were rotated based on forage availability (12-p). Stocking rate was held constant at 3.75 animals per hectare. The ALF-BR and BR pastures yielded more available forage than BFT-BR pastures (9.86 and 10.04 vs 9.14 metric tons/ha). The ALF-BR and BFT-BR pastures, when compared to BR pastures, supported greater animal average daily gain (0.93 and 0.97 vs 0.83 kg/d) and increased animal gain per hectare (497.8 and 516.4 vs 443.3 kg/d). Legume-grass pastures also had lower neutral detergent fiber content than BR pastures. There were no differences in either animal gain or gain per hectare due to grazing system. Three years after seeding, BFT-BR and ALF-BR had a similar percentage of legume present within their respective pastures. Birdsfoot trefoil appears to be an acceptable substitute for alfalfa in properly managed grass-legume mixed pastures. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
