Is plant breeding science objective truth or social construction? The case of yield stability |
| |
| Authors: | David A Cleveland |
| |
| Institution: | (1) Department of Anthropology, and Environmental Studies Program, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, USA |
| |
| Abstract: | This article presents a holistic framework for understanding the scienceof plant breeding, as an alternative to the common objectivist andconstructivist approaches in studies of science. It applies thisapproach to understanding disagreements about how to deal with yieldstability. Two contrasting definitions of yield stability are described,and concomitant differences in the understanding and roles ofsustainability and of selection, test, and target environments areexplored. Critical questions about plant breeding theory and practiceare posed, and answers from the viewpoint of the two contrastingdefinitions of yield stability are analyzed, based on key publicationsin the field. Differences in answers to these questions appear to resultboth from the contingencies of plant breeders' experiences withparticular crop varieties and growing environments, and from differencesin social and institutional settings – plant breeding science isboth objective truth and social construction. The goal of using aholistic framework is to encourage discussion among plant breeders,farmers, social scientists, and others, of the bases for disagreementswithin plant breeding, in order to facilitate plant breeding'scontribution to a more environmentally, economically, and sociallysustainable agriculture. |
| |
| Keywords: | Crop genetic resources Epistemology Genotype-by-environment interaction Green Revolution Modern crop varieties Plant breeding Scientific knowledge Sustainable agriculture Yield stability |
| 本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录！ |
|
