| 黔单16号不同种植模式经济效益比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘胜兵,龙 风,刘 涛,等.黔单16号不同种植模式经济效益比较[J].耕作与栽培,2014(2):23+36-23. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘胜兵 龙 风 刘 涛 等 |
| |
| 作者单位： | [1]黔南州种子管理站,贵州都匀558000; [2]黔南州农业技术推广站,贵州都匀558000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 为探索适宜黔南州节本增效的玉米种植模式,对黔单16号直播和营养球育苗移栽效益进行了比较.试验表明：玉米直播纯收入为474.17元/667m2,高于营养球育苗移栽纯收入高139.72元/667m2.
|
| 关 键 词： | 黔单16号 种植方式 经济效益 |
Economic Benefits Comparison of Qiandan16 under Different Cultivation Method |
| |
| Institution: | LIU Sheng--bing, LONG Feng, LIU Tao, WEI Xing--yu, YIN Chang--gao (1. Qiannan Seeds Control Station, Duyun, Guizhou 558000, China 2. Qiannan Agricultural Technology Extension Station, Duyun, Guizhou 558000, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | For explore the suitable maize cultivation method to reducing expenses and increasing benefits in Qiannan, direct see- ding and seedling transplanting of Qiandanl6 were comparatively tested. The results showed that net beneftis of direct seeding method was 474. 17yuan/667m2, higher than transplanting method 139.72yuan/667m2. |
| |
| Keywords: | Qiandanl6 cultivation method economic benefits |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
