| 生活经验与工作记忆容量对条件推理的影响 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 郝 鑫,杨文静,张庆林.生活经验与工作记忆容量对条件推理的影响[J].西南农业大学学报,2012,34(6):138-144. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 郝 鑫 杨文静 张庆林 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 西南大学心理学院 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然科学基金资助项目(31170983) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 选取5种条件命题的4种推理形式作为实验材料,采用经典的OSPAN任务测得被试的工作记忆容量,考察了生活经验与工作记忆容量对条件推理的影响.研究表明:生活经验会决定问题空间的表征,从而影响条件推理过程;工作记忆容量对条件推理没有影响;生活经验和工作记忆容量没有交互作用.此外,研究还表明在条件推理中,人们倾向于使用启发式策略,较少用到分析式策略.
|
| 关 键 词： | 条件推理 生活经验 工作记忆容量 启发式策略 分析式策略 |
ResearchontheFunctionofDailyExperienceand
WorkingMemoryCapacityinConditionalReasoning |
| |
| HAO Xin,YANG Wen-jing,ZHANG Qing-lin.ResearchontheFunctionofDailyExperienceand
WorkingMemoryCapacityinConditionalReasoning[J].Journal of Southwest Agricultural University,2012,34(6):138-144. |
| |
| Authors: | HAO Xin YANG Wen-jing ZHANG Qing-lin |
| |
| Institution: | School of Psychology,Southwest University,Chongqing 400715,China |
| |
| Abstract: | The aim of this study was to explore the function of daily experience and working memory capacity in conditional reasoning.Four inference forms of five types of proposition were chosen as the experiment material,and participants’ working memory capacity was measured using the Ospan task. The results showed that the main effects of both inference forms and types were significant while the main effect of working memory capacity was non-significant.Also,the interaction between daily experience and working memory capacity was non-significant. The results indicated that daily experience might influence the process of conditional reasoning by playing an essential role in the spatial representation of the premise.However,working memory capacity had no effect on conditional reasoning.In addition,people tended to prefer heuristic processes to analytic processes in conditional reasoning. |
| |
| Keywords: | conditional reasoning daily experience working memory capacity heuristic process analytic process |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《西南农业大学学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《西南农业大学学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
