| 不同甘蔗品种（系）的产量构成因素及品质比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 谭秦亮,朱鹏锦,程琴,李佳慧,吕平,庞新华,周全光.不同甘蔗品种（系）的产量构成因素及品质比较[J].作物杂志,2019,35(3):49-1476. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 谭秦亮 朱鹏锦 程琴 李佳慧 吕平 庞新华 周全光 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1 广西壮族自治区亚热带作物研究所,530001,广西南宁2 广西农垦甘蔗研究所,530001,广西南宁 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 广西科学研究与技术开发计划项目(桂科攻1598006-1-1B);广西创新驱动发展专项资金(桂科AA17202042-5);广西自然科学基金(2017JJB130314);广西农垦研究与技术开发计划项目(桂垦攻科201502);广西科学研究与技术开发计划项目(桂科AD16380032);广西农垦研究与技术开发计划项目(桂垦攻科201501) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 以新台糖22号为对照（CK）,对参试的9个甘蔗品种（系）进行田间一年新植和一年宿根的品比试验,调查参试品种（系）的农艺性状、抗逆性状及产量构成性状,对其进行综合评价。结果表明,9个参试品种（系）比CK增产增糖的品种（系）有6个,其中桂热2号和凉蔗02-186的分蘖率、宿根发株率、蔗茎产量、含糖量和有效茎数等较CK有明显的优势,福农41号的枯心苗率和梢腐病率最高,凉蔗07-53、凉蔗03-23和凉蔗03-81蔗糖分偏低,其他材料与CK差异不大。通过产量和总含糖量综合分析,桂热2号、凉蔗02-186、桂糖42号表现优异,适宜在广西南宁地区及气候相似蔗区大面积推广应用。
|
| 关 键 词： | 甘蔗 农艺性状 产量构成 品比试验 |
| 收稿时间： | 2018-10-08 |
Comparison Study on the Yield Components and Quality of Different Sugarcane Varieties(Lines) |
| |
| Tan Qinliang,Zhu Pengjin,Cheng Qin,Li Jiahui,Lü Ping,Pang Xinhua,Zhou Quanguang.Comparison Study on the Yield Components and Quality of Different Sugarcane Varieties(Lines)[J].Crops,2019,35(3):49-1476. |
| |
| Authors: | Tan Qinliang Zhu Pengjin Cheng Qin Li Jiahui Lü Ping Pang Xinhua Zhou Quanguang |
| |
| Institution: | 1 Guangxi Subtropical Crops Research Institute, Nanning 530001, Guangxi, China2 Sugarcane Research Institute for Guangxi State Farms, Nanning 530001, Guangxi, China |
| |
| Abstract: | In this experiment, ROC22 was used as the control (CK), and nine sugarcane varieties (lines) were tested in the field for plant cane and first ratoon. The agronomic traits, stress resistance and yield traits were investigated and comprehensively evaluated. The results showed that there were six varieties (lines) that increased yield and increased sugar content compared with CK. Among them, the indexes of rate of tillering, rate of perennial root sprout, sugarcane yield, sugar content and effective productive stalk had obvious advantages with CK on Guire 2 and Liangzhe 02-186. The Dead heart rate and tip rot rate of Funong 41 was the highest. The sucrose contents of Liangzhe 07-53, Liangzhe 03-23 and Liangzhe 03-81 were lower, and there was not much difference among other sugarcane varieties (lines). Guire 2, Liangzhe 02-186, and Guitang 42 had excellent performance in yield and total sugar content therefore they are suitable for large-scale demonstration and promotion in Nanning, Guangxi or climate similar sugarcane area. |
| |
| Keywords: | Sugarcane Agronomic trait Yield component Comparison test |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《作物杂志》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《作物杂志》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
