| 养分管理措施对干热河谷火龙果土壤肥力的影响 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王忠云,喻阳华,王芊姿.养分管理措施对干热河谷火龙果土壤肥力的影响[J].中国农业科技导报,2020,22(11):176-186. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王忠云 喻阳华 王芊姿 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1.贵州师范大学地理与环境科学学院, 贵阳 550025;
2.贵州师范大学喀斯特研究院, 贵州省喀斯特山地生态环境国家重点实验室培育基地, 贵阳 550001 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFC0502603)；
贵州省“十一五”社会发展攻关项目（黔合同SZ字\[2008\]3015） |
| |
| 摘 要： | 为阐明火龙果地不同养分管理方式下土壤矿质养分变化特征，揭示土壤肥力质量变化规律，设置施用农家肥（farmyard manure，FM）、套种绿肥（alfalfa，AF）、施用生物有机肥（bio-organic fertilizer，BOF）与凋落物覆盖（litter coverage，LC）4种养分管理方式，通过分析不同处理的土壤肥力指标变化，明确不同养分管理方式对火龙果地土壤肥力质量的影响。结果表明：不同养分管理方式的土壤理化性质变化规律各异，在LC方式下pH低于7，呈弱酸性，其余养分管理方式下均呈弱碱性；LC对土壤有机碳（soil organic carbon，SOC）、有效磷（available phosphorus，AP）、有效锰（available manganese，AMn）、有效铁（available iron，AFe）等土壤养分增效显著，AF对SOC、全氮（total nitrogen，TN）、全钾（total potassium，TK）增效作用较弱，FM以及BOF下SOC及多数有效态元素含量相对较低；土壤速效养分受到pH的影响较大，大量元素与微量元素多呈极显著正相关；不同养分管理方式的土壤质量综合指数表现为，LC（1.793）>AF（0.949）>FM（-0.995）>BOF（-1.747）。LC为土壤养分积累较为适宜的管理方式，其次为AF，FM次之，BOF对土壤养分的积累效应最低，但其对提高作物产量具有较好的作用。
|
| 关 键 词： | 火龙果地 养分管理 土壤肥力 主成分分析 土壤质量综合指数 |
| 收稿时间： | 2019-04-29 |
Effects of Nutrient Management Measures on Soil Fertility of Pitaya in Dry-hot Valley |
| |
| WANG Zhongyun,YU Yanghua,WANG Qianzi.Effects of Nutrient Management Measures on Soil Fertility of Pitaya in Dry-hot Valley[J].Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology,2020,22(11):176-186. |
| |
| Authors: | WANG Zhongyun YU Yanghua WANG Qianzi |
| |
| Institution: | 1.School of Geography and Environmental Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550025, China;
2.The State Key Laboratory Incubation Base for Karst Mountain Ecology Environment of Guizhou Province, School of Karst Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001, China |
| |
| Abstract: | To explore the characteristics of soil fertility quality in different nutrient management methods of pitaya land and reveal the change law of soil fertility quality, 4 treatments were conducted including farmyard manure (FM), alfalfa (AF), bio-organic fertilize(BOF), and litter coverage(LC), which were used to analyze the change of soil fertility indexes and identify the impact of soil fertility quality in different nutrient management methods. The results showed that with various nutrient management methods, the soil fertility was significantly different. The pH was below 7 in LC, indicating weakly acidic, while it displayed weakly alkaline in other nutrient management. LC treatment showed better effects on increasing the contents of soil organic C, available P, available Mn and available Fe, while AF management did not showed benefit effects on soil organic C, total N and total K.The content of soil organic C and the majority of available elements displayed a lower level by FM management as well as BOF management. The pH had major impacts on soil available elements. In addition, there was a significantly positive correlation between soil macroelements and soil microelements. Using different nutrient management methods, the comprehensive soil fertility quality indexes were sorted as follows: LC（1.793）>AF（0.949）>FM（-0.995）>BOF（-1.747）. LC was a more suitable management method for soil nutrient accumulation, followed by AF and FM. BOF had the lowest effect on soil nutrient accumulation, but it had a good effect on improving crop yield. |
| |
| Keywords: | pitaya land nutrient management methods soil fertility principal component analysis soil quality index
|
|
| 点击此处可从《中国农业科技导报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《中国农业科技导报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
