| 居民福祉及其与生态系统服务的关系研究进展 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李昂 杨琰瑛 师荣光 胡斯威 米长虹 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 农业农村部环境保护科研监测所, 天津 300191;中国农业科学院研究生院, 北京 100081;农业农村部环境保护科研监测所, 天津 300191;农业农村部农产品质量安全环境因子控制重点实验室, 天津 300191 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然科学基金项目（42001264）；国家重点研发计划项目（2016YFD0201201） |
| |
| 摘 要： | 居民福祉的持续改善是社会发展的根本目的，然而人们对福祉的内涵理解并不统一，生态环境对居民福祉的贡献没有得到足够的重视。深入认识居民福祉与生态服务之间的关系，对促进居民福祉提升和生态保护的双赢、推动区域可持续发展具有重要意义。本研究首先对居民福祉的内涵、特征和评价方法进行了系统梳理和总结，随后探讨了居民福祉与生态系统服务的关系，最后针对当前研究中的问题和不足，指出未来研究方向。研究指出：居民福祉具有多维性、地域性和尺度效应；主客观指标相结合的评价方式是福祉测度的主要趋势；农户生计方式为深度解析居民福祉和生态系统服务的耦合机制提供了新视角；未来研究应融合多学科知识和方法，规范不同尺度的福祉评价体系，深入解析生态系统服务和居民福祉的耦合机制，将居民福祉纳入生态管理和科学决策。
|
| 关 键 词： | 居民福祉，生态系统服务，主观福祉，客观福祉，人-地关系，耦合机制 |
| 收稿时间： | 2021/6/15 0:00:00 |
Research progress on human well-being and its relationship with ecosystem services |
| |
| Authors: | LI Ang YANG Yanying SHI Rongguang HU Siwei MI Changhong |
| |
| Institution: | Agro-Environmental Protection Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tianjin 300191, China;Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Agriculture Sciences, Beijing 100081, China;Agro-Environmental Protection Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tianjin 300191, China;Key Laboratory for Environmental Factors Control of Agro-product Quality Safety, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tianjin 300191, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Continuous improvement in human well-being is a fundamental purpose of social development. However, understanding the connotations of human well-being is not uniform, and the contribution of the eco-environment to human well-being has not received sufficient attention. Understanding the relationship between ecosystem services and human well-being is of great significance for promoting sustainable regional development. First, this study systematically summarizes the connotation, characteristics, and evaluation methods of human well-being; discusses the relationship between human well-being and ecosystem services; and finally points out future research directions. It was noted that:human well-being has multidimensional, regional, and scale effects; human well-being measurements should combine the subjective and objective indicators; and farmers'' livelihood provides a new perspective to analyze the relationship between ecosystem services and human well-being. Finally, future research directions are prospected, including integrating multidisciplinary knowledge and methods, standardizing the human well-being evaluation system at different scales, deeply analyzing the coupling mechanism between ecosystem services and human well-being, and integrating human well-being into ecological management and decision-making. |
| |
| Keywords: | human well-being ecosystem services subject well-being object well-being man-land relationship coupling mechanism |
|
| 点击此处可从《》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
