|
|||||
|
|
Cut-off points for aggreate herd testing in the presence of disease clustering and correlation of test errors |
|
| Authors: | Alan W Donald Ian A Gardner Alvin D Wiggins |
| Institution: | a Department of Health Management, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, P.E.I. C1A 4P3, Canada b Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA c Division of Statistics, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA |
| Abstract: | In order to test if disease is present in a large herd, an investigator will often subject only a small sample of animals to a fallible diagnostic test. The herd is declared positive for disease if the number of test-positive animals is greater than or equal to a previously chosen cut-off value. Such a test, called an aggregate test, has a sensitivity and specificity that depends on the sample size, the cut-off point and the sensitivity and specificity of the individual test. It also depends on the distribution of the disease among the herds being tested and on the fact that factors such as herd-level seropositivity may cause some herds to be more prone to testing errors than others. In this paper, we use the beta-binomial distribution to model all these factors and thereby calculate and tabulate aggregate test sensitivities and specificities under a variety of conditions. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve methodology permits the choice of optimum sample sizes and cut-off values. We also investigate the situation in which an investigator may be willing to miss detecting the disease if the prevalence in the herd is low. A compiled FORTRAN program for the calculation of aggregate test cut-off point properties, including positive and negative predictive values, is available from the authors. |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ | |