| 不同期刊评价体系对中国水产类期刊的评价比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张海宁,卢怡,张美琼,郭丰红.不同期刊评价体系对中国水产类期刊的评价比较[J].中国农学通报,2014,30(14):98-102. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张海宁 卢怡 张美琼 郭丰红 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 上海海洋大学学报编辑部2. |
| |
| 摘 要： | 介绍了国内主要期刊评价系统北京大学图书馆《中文核心期刊要目总览》、武汉大学中国科学评价研究中心《中国学术期刊评价研究报告》、中科院文献情报中心《中国科学引文数据库》(CSCD)的概况以及对中国水产类科技期刊的评价情况。比较了各评价系统评价指标的异同点，得出提高水产类期刊排名的措施主要有：（1）刊发论文要重点突出，主题明确；（2）重视第一权重指标影响因子的地位；（3）重视期刊的他引率；（4）重视二次文献转载，归结到根本上还是要提高稿源的质量；（5）重视WEB下载量。
|
| 关 键 词： | 制度理论 制度理论 |
| 收稿时间： | 2013/7/11 0:00:00 |
| 修稿时间： | 2013/8/19 0:00:00 |
Comparison Among Three Chinese Journal-ranking Systems and Their Evaluation of Aquaculture Journals |
| |
| Abstract: | Three Chinese journal-ranking systems, including“Chinese Core Journals”,“A Report on Chinese Academic Journals Evaluation”and“Chinese Science Citation Database”were compared and their evaluation of Chinese aquaculture journals was described. The differences and similarity of the three ranking systems were examined. Potential methods of improving the rank of aquaculture journals were summarized as: (1) publishing papers with clear research objectives and emphases; (2) valuing more on the first weighed impact factor; (3) emphasizing the citation rate of the papers published in the journal; (4) attaching a higher importance to second-hand citation rate, and ultimately attracting submission with high qualities; (5) putting more weight on the download rate from the journal website. |
| |
| Keywords: | comparison |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《中国农学通报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《中国农学通报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
