|
|||||
|
|
| 杨梅不同栽培模式效益评价 | |
| 引用本文： | 柴春燕,郑世伟,王天飞,王岳善.杨梅不同栽培模式效益评价[J].浙江林业科技,2004,24(5):56-59. |
| 作者姓名： | 柴春燕 郑世伟 王天飞 王岳善 |
| 作者单位： | 1. 浙江省慈溪市林特技术推广中心,浙江,慈溪,315300 2. 浙江省慈溪市龙山镇农办,浙江,慈溪,315300 3. 浙江省慈溪市横河镇农办,浙江,慈溪,315300 4. 浙江省慈溪市掌起镇农办,浙江,慈溪,315300 |
| 摘 要： | 杨梅在常规栽培模式下,栽植密度为330 ～ 400株/hm2,第4年开始少量投入产出,第8年开始获取纯利润,第13年产值达8.0万元/hm2;投资年平均效益系数为0.26元,年平均投入产出比1∶3.43.杨梅-茶-桃混交林模式,初植密度为杨梅200株/hm2,茶18 000株/hm2,桃600株/ hm2,造林后第3年少量产出,第5年即可获取纯利润,投资回收期比纯林栽培模式缩短3a,第13年产值达10.5万元/hm2;投资年平均效益系数为0.35元,年平均投入产出比1∶4.56.可见,与纯林相比,混交林模式具有投入产出早、投本少、投资回收快、投资效益系数高等特点.混交林尚有较好的社会效益和生态效益. |
| 关 键 词： | 杨梅 杨梅-茶-桃混交 栽培模式 效益 评价 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-3776(2004)05-0056-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004年5月9日 |
Evaluation on Effect of Different Cultivation Patterns of Chinese Bayberry |
|
| CHAI Chun-yan,ZHENG Shi-wei,WANG Tian-fei,WANG Yue-shan.Evaluation on Effect of Different Cultivation Patterns of Chinese Bayberry[J].Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology,2004,24(5):56-59. | |
| Authors: | CHAI Chun-yan ZHENG Shi-wei WANG Tian-fei WANG Yue-shan |
| Institution: | CHAI Chun-yan1,ZHENG Shi-wei2,WANG Tian-fei3,WANG Yue-shan4 |
| Abstract: | With the density of 330~400 tree/hm2, Chinese bayberry forest has a few products in the 4th year. From the 8th year, it can gain the net-profit, and the annual output value reaches 80 thousands yuan RMB/ hm2 in the 13th year. The annual rate of input/output is 1:10. In the mixed forest of Chinese bayberry-tea-peach, the density of Chinese bayberry is 200 tree/ hm2, tea 18 000 tree/ hm2, peach 600 tree/ hm2. The mixed forest has a few products in the 3rd year and gains the net-profit in the 5th year. The output value reaches 105 thousands yuan/ hm2 in the 13th year. The rate of input/output tops 1:4.56. As the result, mixed forest has better economic and ecological benefits. |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ | |