首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

基于集约化农区种养结合的猪粪处理模式生命周期评价
引用本文:靳红梅,常志州,马艳,严少华,盛婧,黄红英,吴华山,孙国峰.基于集约化农区种养结合的猪粪处理模式生命周期评价[J].农业环境科学学报,2015,34(8):1625-1632.
作者姓名:靳红梅  常志州  马艳  严少华  盛婧  黄红英  吴华山  孙国峰
作者单位:江苏省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所 江苏省农业废弃物资源化工程技术研究中心, 南京 210014;农业部农村可再生能源开发利用华东科学观测实验站, 南京 210014;食品安全省部共建实验室食品质量安全研究重点实验室, 南京 210014,江苏省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所 江苏省农业废弃物资源化工程技术研究中心, 南京 210014;农业部农村可再生能源开发利用华东科学观测实验站, 南京 210014,江苏省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所 江苏省农业废弃物资源化工程技术研究中心, 南京 210014;农业部农村可再生能源开发利用华东科学观测实验站, 南京 210014,江苏省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所 江苏省农业废弃物资源化工程技术研究中心, 南京 210014,江苏省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所 江苏省农业废弃物资源化工程技术研究中心, 南京 210014;农业部农村可再生能源开发利用华东科学观测实验站, 南京 210014,江苏省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所 江苏省农业废弃物资源化工程技术研究中心, 南京 210014;农业部农村可再生能源开发利用华东科学观测实验站, 南京 210014,江苏省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所 江苏省农业废弃物资源化工程技术研究中心, 南京 210014;农业部农村可再生能源开发利用华东科学观测实验站, 南京 210014,江苏省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所 江苏省农业废弃物资源化工程技术研究中心, 南京 210014;农业部农村可再生能源开发利用华东科学观测实验站, 南京 210014
基金项目:农业部公益性行业计划(201203050);江苏省农业自主创新基金项目(CX(12)1002)
摘    要:以规模生猪养殖-无公害种植基地为研究对象,采用生命周期评价的方法,比较了基于种养结合的粪污直接还田、处理(堆肥、厌氧发酵)后还田以及非种养结合(肥料出售)3种情景模式的环境影响潜力。评价结果表明:通过种养结合将粪污进行农田利用,替代化学肥料的施用,对环境有积极的正效应;基于种养结合模式的养殖场粪污利用过程中,其处理后还田的环境影响潜力(2.03 kg 当量·人-1·a-1)显著低于直接还田模式(3.02 kg 当量·人-1·a-1),同时具有一定的经济效益;粪便处理环节的环境影响潜力占整体的比例最高(> 50%),其中液体粪污处理方式的选择和优化是难点和重点。建议规模化养殖场配套足够的农田以消纳养殖粪污,并发展以沼气工程为纽带的种养结合循环农业模式。

关 键 词:生命周期评价  集约化农区  种养结合  猪粪处理
收稿时间:2015/3/24 0:00:00

Life Cycle Assessment of Different Treatment Modes of Pig Manure Based on Integrated Planting and Raising System in Intensive Agricultural Region
JIN Hong-mei,CHANG Zhi-zhou,MA Yan,YAN Shao-hu,SHENG Jing,HUANG Hong-ying,WU Hua-shan and SUN Guo-feng.Life Cycle Assessment of Different Treatment Modes of Pig Manure Based on Integrated Planting and Raising System in Intensive Agricultural Region[J].Journal of Agro-Environment Science( J. Agro-Environ. Sci.),2015,34(8):1625-1632.
Authors:JIN Hong-mei  CHANG Zhi-zhou  MA Yan  YAN Shao-hu  SHENG Jing  HUANG Hong-ying  WU Hua-shan and SUN Guo-feng
Institution:Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences;Jiangsu Agricultural Waste Treatment and Recycle Engineering Research Center, Nanjing 210014, China;Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment in Downstream of Yangtze Plain, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing 210014, China;Key Lab of Food Quality and Safety of Jiangsu Province-State Key Laboratory Breeding Base, Nanjing 210014, China,Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences;Jiangsu Agricultural Waste Treatment and Recycle Engineering Research Center, Nanjing 210014, China;Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment in Downstream of Yangtze Plain, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing 210014, China,Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences;Jiangsu Agricultural Waste Treatment and Recycle Engineering Research Center, Nanjing 210014, China;Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment in Downstream of Yangtze Plain, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing 210014, China,Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences;Jiangsu Agricultural Waste Treatment and Recycle Engineering Research Center, Nanjing 210014, China,Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences;Jiangsu Agricultural Waste Treatment and Recycle Engineering Research Center, Nanjing 210014, China;Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment in Downstream of Yangtze Plain, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing 210014, China,Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences;Jiangsu Agricultural Waste Treatment and Recycle Engineering Research Center, Nanjing 210014, China;Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment in Downstream of Yangtze Plain, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing 210014, China,Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences;Jiangsu Agricultural Waste Treatment and Recycle Engineering Research Center, Nanjing 210014, China;Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment in Downstream of Yangtze Plain, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing 210014, China and Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences;Jiangsu Agricultural Waste Treatment and Recycle Engineering Research Center, Nanjing 210014, China;Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment in Downstream of Yangtze Plain, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing 210014, China
Abstract:In intensive agricultural region, the environmental impact potential of integrated planting and raising system has been unclear so far, which is limiting the application of integrated planting and raising technique. This study was to evaluate and compare the environmental impact potential of different treatment modes of pig manure from integrated planting and raising system using life cycle assessment(LCA)method. The treatment modes of pig manure included direct application(DA), composting and digestion-application(CDA) and composting-sale(CS). Since applying raising waste to planting fields reduced chemical fertilizer inputs, integrated planting and raising system showed positive impacts to the environment, as compared to CS. Total environmental impact potential was lower(2.03 kg eq per person per year) in CDA than in DA(3.02 kg eq per person per year). Furthermore, applications of manure to planting field had significant economic benefit. Manure treatment contributed to more than 50% of the total environmental impact potential, especially liquid slurry treatment. It thus suggests that enough farmland nearby an intensive raising farm is needed to handle animal manure. Integrated planting and raising system coupled with biogas production should be developed in the future.
Keywords:life cycle assessment  intensive agricultural region  integrated planting and raising  pig manure treatment
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《农业环境科学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《农业环境科学学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号