|
|||||
|
|
| 白斑狗鱼与黑斑狗鱼的形态差异与判别分析 | |
| 引用本文： | 霍堂斌,袁美云,马波,蔡林刚,阿达可白克·可尔江,姜作发.白斑狗鱼与黑斑狗鱼的形态差异与判别分析[J].大连水产学院学报,2011,26(3):253-259. |
| 作者姓名： | 霍堂斌 袁美云 马波 蔡林刚 阿达可白克·可尔江 姜作发 |
| 作者单位： | 1. 中国水产科学研究院,黑龙江水产研究所,农业部黑龙江流域渔业资源与环境重点野外科学观测试验站,黑龙江哈尔滨150070;东北林业大学,动物科技学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150040 2. 哈尔滨市农业科学院,水产研究分院,黑龙江哈尔滨150078 3. 中国水产科学研究院,黑龙江水产研究所,农业部黑龙江流域渔业资源与环境重点野外科学观测试验站,黑龙江哈尔滨150070 4. 新疆维吾尔自治区,水产科学研究所,新疆乌鲁木齐830000 |
| 基金项目： | 黑水研基本科研专项，环保部全国生物物种资源联合执法检查和调查项目，公益性行业(农业)科研专项经费资助，农业部鱼类生物育种实验室项目 |
| 摘 要： | 将传统形态学测定和框架测定相结合，采用聚类分析、主成分分析和判别分析3种多元分析方法，对白斑狗鱼Esox lucius和黑斑狗鱼Esox relchrti的不同地理居群共115尾标本的36个测量性状和12个可数性状数据进行统计分析，以探讨两种狗鱼的形态差异。可数性状卡方检验结果表明，自斑狗鱼与黑斑狗鱼的背鳍棘数、臀鳍棘数、臀鳍分支鳍条数、纵行鳞数、侧线上鳞以及侧线下鳞差异极显著。在可量性状上，聚类分析与主成分分析结果一致，黑斑狗鱼乌苏里江种群与嫩江种群差异最小，首先聚为一支，后与黑龙江种群聚为一支，两种狗鱼差异明显，白斑狗鱼为单独一支。判别分析结果表明，不同种群形态差异极显著（P〈0．01），判别准确率P1为96．4％～100％。分析结果显示两种狗鱼在形态上已产生一定程度的差异。 |
| 关 键 词： | 白斑狗鱼 黑斑狗鱼 形态差异 框架分析 多元分析 |
Morphological variations and discrimination between northern pike Esox lucius and Amur pike Esox reicherti |
|
| HUO Tang-bin,YUAN Mei-yun,MA Bo,CAI Lin-gang,Adakbek·kar,JIANG Zuo-fa.Morphological variations and discrimination between northern pike Esox lucius and Amur pike Esox reicherti[J].Journal of Dalian Fisheries University,2011,26(3):253-259. | |
| Authors: | HUO Tang-bin YUAN Mei-yun MA Bo CAI Lin-gang Adakbek·kar JIANG Zuo-fa |
| Institution: | 1. Heilongjiang River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Key Field Scientific Observation Station of Fisheries Resoures and Environment in HeilongJiang River Valley, Ministry of Agriculture, Harbin 150070, China ;2. Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China ; 3. Institute of Fisheries Research, Harbin Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Harbin 150078,China;4. Institute of Fisheries Science, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 830000, China) |
| Abstract: | A total of 36 morphometric and twelve meristic features were measured in 115 specimens of both northern pike Esox lucius and Amur pike Esox reicherti to evaluate the morphological variations and discrimination by combination of traditional morphological data with truss network data using cluster analysis, and principal component analysis. The meristic features indicated that there were significant differences between E. lucius and E. reichrti in number of spine on dorsal fin, number of spine on anal fin, number of soft anal ray, scale number on lateral line, scale number above lateral line and scale number beneath lateral line. The cluster analysis revealed that the morphometric characters were coincident with the principal component analysis. The northern pike was clearly found to be separated from three populations of Amur pike. There was the minimal difference in Amur pike between Wusuli- jiang fiver population and Nengjiang river population. Discriminant analysis showed that very significant differences were found among the different populations （P〈0.01） , with identification accuracy P1 of 96.4%- 100% in the four populations,indicating that there were some differences between northern pike and Amur pike. |
| Keywords: | Esox lucius Esox reichrti morphological variation truss network multivariation analysis |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ | |