| 祁连山南坡土壤侵蚀时空变化及迁移特征分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 童 珊,,,曹广超,,张 卓,,,闫 欣,,,刁二龙,,.祁连山南坡土壤侵蚀时空变化及迁移特征分析[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(4):18-27. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 童 珊 曹广超 张 卓 闫 欣 刁二龙 |
| |
| 作者单位： | (1.青海师范大学 地理科学学院, 西宁 810008; 2.青海省自然地理与环境过程重点实验室, 西宁 810008; 3.青藏高原地表过程与生态保育教育部重点实验室, 西宁 810008) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 土壤侵蚀是威胁人类生态环境及社会经济的重要因子。为实现土地资源更加有效的保护与治理,基于RUSLE模型和GIS/RS空间信息技术,分析和讨论了祁连山南坡2000—2019年土壤侵蚀时空变化及土壤侵蚀重心迁移特征。结果表明:祁连山南坡土壤侵蚀模数在空间变化上整体呈现出由西北向东南递减的趋势,土壤侵蚀模数平均值由2000年的1 966.63 t/(km2·a)增加至2005年的3 228.51 t/(km2·a),最后下降至2019年的2 299.06 t/(km2·a); 草地土壤侵蚀量最大,为2.65×107～4.25×107 t/a,虽侵蚀较为严重,但土壤侵蚀重心并未发生较大的迁移,五县中祁连县土壤侵蚀最为严重且重心迁移距离最大,侵蚀量为3.01×107～4.83×107 t/a,共迁移351.89 m,迁移速率为17.59 m/a,说明祁连县土壤侵蚀不稳定,土壤低级侵蚀更容易向高级侵蚀转化; 土地利用类型中冰川迁移最大为367.78 m,迁移速率为18.39 m/a。综合得出,对于土壤侵蚀较轻且重心迁移不大的区域可以采取定点治理,对于祁连县应长时间监测,全力推进祁连县水土保持综合治理工程,缓解水土流失; 相较于其他生态系统,对于草地与林地应加强治理。
|
| 关 键 词： | 土壤侵蚀 时空变化 迁移距离 不同行政区划 主要植被类型 |
Analysis of the Spatial and Temporal Changes and Migration Characteristics of Soil Erosion in the South Slope of Qilian Mountain |
| |
| TONG Shan,,,CAO Guangchao,,ZHANG Zhuo,,,YAN Xin,,,DIAO Erlong,,.Analysis of the Spatial and Temporal Changes and Migration Characteristics of Soil Erosion in the South Slope of Qilian Mountain[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(4):18-27. |
| |
| Authors: | TONG Shan CAO Guangchao ZHANG Zhuo YAN Xin DIAO Erlong |
| |
| Institution: | (1.College of Geographical Sciences, Qinghai Normal University, Xining 810008, China; 2.Qinghai Key Laboratory of Natural Geography and Environmental Process, Qinghai Normal University, Xining 810008, China; 3.Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Ecological Conservation of the Ministry of Education, Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, Xining 810008, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Soil erosion is an important factor that threatens human ecological environment and social economy. In order to achieve more effective protection and management of land resources, based on the RUSLE model and GIS/RS spatial information technology, we analyzed and discussed the temporal and spatial changes of soil erosion and the migration characteristics of soil erosion gravity center on the southern slope of Qilianshan Mountains from 2000 to 2019. The results show that the soil erosion modulus on the southern slope of Qilianshan Mountain presented a decreasing trend from northwest to southeast in terms of spatial variation; the average soil erosion modulus increased from 1 966.63 t/(km2·a)in 2000 to 3 228.51 t/(km2·a)in 2005, and finally dropped to 2 299.06 t/(km2·a)in 2019; the amount of grassland soil erosion was the largest, which was 2.65×107～4.25×107 t/a, although the erosion was relatively serious, the center of gravity of soil erosion did not move significantly; among the five counties, Qilian County had the most severe soil erosion and the largest migration distance of the center of gravity; the amount of erosion was between 3.01×107 t/a and 4.83×107 t/a, the total migration was 351.89 m, and the migration rate was 17.59 m/a, indicating that soil erosion in Qilian County was unstable, and low-grade soil erosion easily transformed into high-grade erosion; the largest glacier migration in land use types was 367.78 m, the migration rate was 18.39 m/a. It is concluded that fixed-point treatment can be adopted for areas with less soil erosion and little center of gravity migration, and Qilian County should be monitored for a long time, and the comprehensive treatment project of soil and water conservation in Qilian County should be fully promoted to alleviate soil erosion. Compared with other ecological system, the grassland and forestland should be strengthened. |
| |
| Keywords: | soil erosion spatial and temporal change migration distance different administrative divisions main vegetation types |
|
| 点击此处可从《水土保持研究》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《水土保持研究》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
