首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Perceived ecosystem services synergies,trade-offs,and bundles in European high nature value farming landscapes
Authors:Plieninger  Tobias  Torralba  Mario  Hartel  Tibor  Fagerholm  Nora
Institution:1.Social-Ecological Interactions in Agricultural Systems, University of Kassel, Steinstr. 19, 37213, Witzenhausen, Germany
;2.University of G?ttingen, Platz der G?ttinger Sieben 5, 37073, G?ttingen, Germany
;3.Department of Biology and Ecology in Hungarian and Center of Systems Biology, Biodiversity and Bioresources, Babes-Bolyai University, Str. Clinicilor 5-7, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
;4.Department of Geography and Geology, University of Turku, 20014, Turku, Finland
;
Abstract:Context

Around 30% of European agricultural landscapes are classified as high nature value (HNV) farmlands. Current policies emphasize the multifunctionality of these landscapes, but little is known about the positive and negative associations of multiple ecosystem services within HNV farmland.

Objectives

This study aims to identify perceived ecosystem services synergies, trade-offs, and bundles in agricultural landscapes of HNV from a socio-cultural perspective.

Methods

We performed a participatory mapping survey of 10 ecosystem services categories among 2301 rural residents in 13 European sites. We analyzed bivariate synergies and trade-offs between perceived ecosystem services through nonparametric correlation analyses. Spatial bundles of perceived ecosystem services were identified through hierarchical cluster analysis. Multinomial logit models were used to assess the influence of land cover on generating associations of ecosystem services.

Results

We find two strong and 16 moderate synergies of perceived ecosystem services (out of 46 possible ecosystem services pairs), mainly among different cultural ecosystem services. We do not reveal moderate or strong trade-offs. We identify five spatial bundles of ecosystem services, termed “Ecosystem services coldspots”, “Wild harvesting ranges”, “Nature areas”, “Recreational spaces”, and “Ecosystem services hotspots”. Of all land-cover co-variates, natural areas, urban areas, and roads have the strongest explanatory power.

Conclusions

Our study complements prevailing biophysical and economic analyses of ecosystem services synergies, trade-offs and bundles by a spatially explicit, socio-cultural perspective. We conclude that socio-cultural mapping of ecosystem services is useful for understanding the perceived multifunctionality of a landscape.

Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号