共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 234 毫秒
1.
IHA与ELISA检测猪瘟病毒抗体的比较 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
应用间接血凝试验(IHA)和酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)检测猪瘟病毒抗体,IHA试验以1∶16为判定孔,抗体效价大于或等于1∶16为抗体阳性;ELISA试验以抗体阻断率40%为判定标准,阻断率大于或等于40%为抗体阳性,同步检测了122份规模化猪场不同阶段免疫猪血清.结果ELISA检测抗体阳性率比IHA检测抗体阳性率低,阴性、阳性相符的血清数为92份,相关性为 75.4%,不同抗体水平分布的血清数也不同,个别血清出现较大差异,卡方检验P值为0.13(＞0.05),两种检测方法统计上无差异,研究结果为选择猪瘟病毒抗体检测方法提供参考. 相似文献
2.
《中国兽医学报》2014,(10):1584-1588
为了进一步提高对猪圆环病毒2型(PCV2)检测的特异性,利用PCV2Cap蛋白及酶标记Cap单克隆抗体,建立了一种检测猪血清中PCV2Cap蛋白抗体的阻断ELISA方法,并将其组装成试剂盒。对阻断ELISA试剂盒进行了敏感性、特异性、重复性、符合率和保存期测定。结果显示,其敏感性高,特异性强,批内批间重复性好,与商品化试剂盒符合率高,保存期长且性质相对稳定。先后制备了5个批次的阻断ELISA试剂盒,用于检测PCV2不同疫苗免疫猪血清、规模猪场PMWS发病猪及同群健康猪血清、不同日龄猪群血清.结果显示,PCV2油佐剂免疫组血清抗体水平相对较高,PWMS发病猪血清抗体水平高于同群健康猪,猪群中育肥猪血清抗体水平最高。 相似文献
3.
4.
为评价不同检测方法检测的口蹄疫疫苗抗体效价与免疫保护率的相关性,使用O型液相阻断ELISA、正向间接血凝试验、VP1结构蛋白抗体ELISA三种检测方法对免疫不同类型O型口蹄疫疫苗的60头猪进行血清抗体跟踪测定,免疫21 d后,分别用OZK/93和O/(XJ/10-11/MYA/98)毒株进行攻毒保护实验.数据统计和分析结果显示,0型液相阻断ELISA试验测定的抗体效价与攻毒保护率存在着极显著的正相关性(P＜0.01),相关系数为0.75;正向间接血凝试验测定的抗体效价以及VP1结构蛋白抗体ELISA法测定的S/P值与攻毒保护率之间均不存在线性相关关系(P＞0.05).试验表明,O型液相阻断ELISA抗体检测方法可作为田间猪O型口蹄疫疫苗免疫效果的评价方法. 相似文献
5.
流行性乙型脑炎是由日本脑炎病毒(JEV)引起的蚊媒传播人畜共患传染病,严重危害人类和猪、马等动物的健康。为建立检测多种动物血清中JEV抗体的ELISA,应用重组囊膜蛋白和辣根过氧化物酶标记的JEV单克隆抗体建立了检测JEV抗体的阻断ELISA。结果显示:通过对100份JEV抗体阴性猪血清的检测结果进行统计学分析,确定阻断ELISA的判定标准:阻断率(PI)≥34%时判定为阳性,PI≤25%时判定为阴性,25%PI34%时判定为可疑。该阻断ELISA与其他常见猪病毒病抗体阳性血清无交叉反应;批内和批间重复试验的变异系数均小于5%;与商品化ELISA试剂盒的对比检测表明,敏感性为98.5%、特异性为94.3%,两者的符合率为97.2%。应用该阻断ELISA对临床收集的猪、牛和羊共515份血清样品进行检测,JEV抗体阳性检出率分别为74.5%、13.3%和9.2%,抽样的血清中和试验结果与阻断ELISA检测结果的符合率为100%(9/9)。本研究成功建立了可适用于猪、牛和羊临床血清JEV抗体检测的阻断ELISA方法。 相似文献
6.
本研究建立的检测狂犬病抗体的夹心阻断ELISA,直接利用未经提纯的病毒悬液代替提纯的抗原,并仅用一种酶标抗体,测定了9种动物的血清.本方法敏感度的95%可信限为0.0013～0.0071IU/mL,比小鼠中和试验和微量免疫酶试验均敏感.按阻断50%判定血清ELISA的阴阳性,9种动物的1134份血清中有91份阳性,其中发病点的牛、猪、犬、家鼠血清的阳性率均在10%以上.根据对一定量的抗原阻断率相同时,抗体浓度一致的原理,测定了7种动物的185份血清效价,结果狂犬病抗体浓度在0.01IU/mL以上的为63份.利用夹心阻断ELISA和小鼠中和试验测定了7种动物的23份血清,阳性份数分别为12和11.两种方法均证明家鼠血清中有狂犬病抗体.本研究表明,测定狂犬病抗体的夹心阻断ELISA,简便、敏感、快速,可用于流行病学调查. 相似文献
7.
为了寻找筛选猪瘟抗体阴性猪更简便的方法,本试验应用猪瘟中和试验(SN)、阻断ELISA和正向间接血凝(IHA)三种方法分别对170份未经猪瘟活疫苗免疫的仔猪血清进行猪瘟抗体检测。结果显示,SN、ELISA和IHA检测出的猪瘟阴性血清分别为144份、150份和131份,表明三种检测方法有较好的符合率,其中SN与ELISA的检测符合率为90.59%,SN与IHA的检测符合率为82.94%,而ELISA法与另两种方法比较阴性符合率最高。本结果表明,ELISA法具有较高的敏感性,适合应用于猪瘟活疫苗安全检验抗体阴性猪的筛选。 相似文献
8.
本文旨在通过试验,进而对猪口蹄疫O型灭活疫苗以及合成肽疫苗的免疫效果以及科学的检测方法形成深入了解,此次试验在某猪场进行.采用了以下方法:将试验猪划分为3组,每组所注射的疫苗,由不同厂家生产.主要采用了猪口蹄疫O型灭活疫苗以及合成肽疫苗.其中,前者又可进一步划分为OZK/93株、OS/99株疫苗,并采用HI、口蹄疫O型液相阻断ELISA抗体检测试剂盒以及猪O型口蹄疫VPI抗体检测试剂盒来检测以上口蹄疫苗免疫效果.得出以下结果:在注射口蹄疫O型合成肽疫苗后,采用猪O型口蹄疫VPI抗体检测试剂盒进行检测,抗体阳性率达到100％;采用HI以及液相阻断ELISA方法之后,未能检测出抗体效价.探究结果表明,在注射免疫猪口蹄疫O型灭活疫苗之后,分别采用VPI抗体检测试剂盒、HI方法以及液相阻断ELISA方法进行检测,所得抗体阳性率相应为40％、75％、70％. 相似文献
9.
本试验旨在迅速、准确检测口蹄疫阴性血清和阳性血清,确立O型口蹄疫抗体金标检测试纸条的判定标准。通过3批次O型口蹄疫抗体金标检测试纸条,对180份猪、牛、羊口蹄疫阴性血清,197份猪、牛O型口蹄疫弱阳性血清,317份猪、牛、羊O型口蹄疫阳性血清,223份牛Asia 1、A型口蹄疫阳性血清,600份田间血清样品进行检测,同时用O型口蹄疫液相阻断ELISA和O型口蹄疫正向间接血凝2种方法检测相同的血清样品。对3种方法检测的结果进行分析,并且将试纸条的检测线和质控线的显色情况与O型口蹄疫液相阻断ELISA的抗体滴度相比较。确立了试纸条的诊断标准:试纸条抗体滴度1∶2-为口蹄疫抗体阴性;试纸条抗体滴度1∶8+为O型口蹄疫阳性血清。根据试纸条的显色结果与液相阻断ELISA的结果的关系,绘制了比色卡。试纸条的判定标准检测血清结果与液相阻断ELISA和正向间接血凝结果分别进行统计学分析,试纸条与液相阻断ELISA和正向间接血凝相关性分别为y=1.142x+0.7421,y=1.1845x+0.8623;相关系数(r)分别为0.9221和0.9033。结果显示,O型口蹄疫抗体金标检测试纸条的判定标准的确立和比色卡的绘制,实现半定量分析,更加迅速、准确,适于实验室、基层兽医站和养殖场使用。 相似文献
10.
《畜牧与兽医》2020,(11)
为了建立一种经济可靠的猪瘟病毒(CSFV)抗体检测方法,本研究利用杆状病毒表达系统表达可溶性CSFV E2蛋白,并免疫BALB/c小鼠,制备了45株可稳定分泌抗CSFV E2蛋白单克隆抗体(McAb)的杂交瘤细胞。经CSFV阳性血清阻断试验筛选出4株具有阻断活性的McAb,并经抗原表位鉴定确定单抗15A9识别的是可用于鉴别CSFV和牛病毒性腹泻病毒(BVDV)的线性表位TAVSPTTLR。利用辣根过氧化物酶(HRP)标记的15A9建立了CSFV阻断ELISA抗体检测方法,用此方法检测猪瘟疫苗免疫的猪血清,免疫后2周即可检测到抗体,且该方法检测BVDV阳性血清为阴性。本研究建立的CSFV阻断ELISA抗体检测方法为CSFV的疫苗免疫效果评估及其与BVDV的抗体鉴别提供了一种有效、便捷的方法。 相似文献
11.
R Wongwatcharadumrong J Moreno-Lopez 《Zentralblatt für Veterin?rmedizin. Reihe B. Journal of veterinary medicine. Series B》1990,37(10):760-766
The virus neutralization (VN) test and two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (blocking and indirect ELISAs) were used to detect antibodies to pseudorabies virus on serum samples of 1,000 pigs from the central part of Thailand. The results of these tests were compared to those of VN test. Using the VN test as standard, the blocking and indirect ELISAs showed respectively 95.12% and 99.37% relative sensitivity and 92.0% and 93.5% relative specificity. The two ELISAs were considered both as practical alternatives to the VN test. However, the indirect ELISA was the more suitable test for the routine screening for antibodies to pseudorabies virus in Thailand. 相似文献
12.
Many commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) are unable to differentiate antibody responses to different avian influenza virus (AIV) subtypes. Developing an ELISA for specifically detecting the H5 antibody is the purpose of this study. Four monoclonal antibodies (Mabs) were raised using A/duck/Yunlin/04 (H5N2). They were confirmed as being specific to H5. Two of these antibodies showed hemagglutination inhibition (HI) activity using the HI test. Using immunodot blot assays, three Mabs recognized both Eurasian and American H5, whereas the other Mab recognized only the tested Eurasian H5 virus. When testing denatured H5 antigen, one of the Mabs lost its antigen binding activity using Western blotting. For detecting the H5 humoral response in serum, one monoclonal antibody was purified and labeled with horseradish peroxidase to set up a blocking ELISA. Chicken sera that blocked H5 Mab binding by > 29% were considered H5 antibody positive. Inhibition percentages for sera from chickens infected with other AIV subtypes, H1 to H15, were < 29%. This blocking ELISA was used for 478 field chicken serum samples. The results showed that the sensitivity and specificity of this ELISA were 98.3% (232/236) and 95.9% (232/242), respectively. This blocking ELISA could be used specifically for detecting the H5 humoral responses in chickens. 相似文献
13.
A blocking enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test has been developed to distinguish pseudorabies virus (PRV) (Aujeszky's disease virus) -infected pigs from those immunized with a glycoprotein g92 (gIII) deletion mutant, PRV (dlg92dltk) [OMNIMARK-PRV]. This blocking ELISA test utilizes an anti-PRV gIII monoclonal antibody (mAbgIII)-horseradish peroxidase (HRPO) conjugate, TMB for color development and a cloned PRVg92 (gIII) antigen to coat wells of microtiter test plates. Undiluted sera are used to block the binding of the mAbgIII-HRPO conjugate to the antigen. The gIII blocking ELISA is specific and has a sensitivity comparable to screening ELISA and latex agglutination tests. PRV-negative sera and sera from pigs vaccinated once, twice, or four times with the gIII-negative vaccine all showed negative S/N values of greater than 0.70 (S/N defined as the optical density at 630 nm of test sera/optical density at 630 nm of negative control sera). Sera from PRV-infected herds, sera from pigs experimentally infected with virulent PRV, and sera from pigs vaccinated with modified-live or inactivated gIII+ vaccines were positive for gIII antibodies (S/N less than 0.7). Sera from pigs experimentally infected with 200 PFU virulent PRV seroconverted to gIII+ antibodies 7-10 days postinfection. Sera from pigs vaccinated with gpX- and gI- vaccines seroconverted to gIII+ antibodies 7-8 days after vaccination. The gIII antibodies persisted after gIII+ vaccinated for at least 376 days postvaccination. Sera from pigs protected by vaccination with PRV (dlg92dltk) and then challenge exposed to virulent PRV at 21 days postvaccination showed gIII+ antibodies by 14 days postchallenge. The specificity and sensitivity of the gIII blocking ELISA assay was further demonstrated on the United States Department of Agriculture-National Veterinary Services Laboratory (USDA-NVSL) sera from the 1988 PRV check set and the 1989 gIII PRV check set by comparing the gIII blocking ELISA assay with virus neutralization, screening/verification ELISA and latex agglutination assays. 相似文献
14.
M B Rhodes C A Klucas M L Frey G A Anderson 《Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation》1989,1(4):324-328
A blocking enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) has been adapted to detect specific antibodies in bovine sera to respiratory syncytial virus using a horseradish peroxidase-labeled monoclonal antibody to the fusion protein of the virus. This assay plus an indirect blocking ELISA and indirect ELISA were used to detect antibodies to the bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV) in 159 field-origin bovine sera. Results of these assays were compared with serum antibody titers measured by the serum neutralization (SN) test. Over a 56-day period, the mean neutralization titers and the mean delta absorbance values for the blocking ELISA, on the same sera, showed similar declines. However, the calculated correlation coefficients between mean SN titer and mean absorbance value for the blocking ELISA of the individual sera ranged from -0.2 to -0.5 depending on the source of sera. Similar values were obtained whether using crude or purified viral antigen in the assays. Corresponding calculated correlation coefficients were generally higher for the indirect blocking ELISA or indirect ELISA than for the blocking ELISA. The blocking ELISA was between 70 and 64% as sensitive as the serum neutralization test with a specificity of 100 or 90% using the crude and purified viral antigen, respectively. The indirect blocking ELISA and indirect ELISA had similar calculated sensitivities and specificities. The blocking ELISA was faster to run than either of the other ELISA's or the neutralization test. Further, nonspecific background absorbance was obviated because the blocking ELISA detects antibodies to 1 specific viral protein, the fusion protein. These studies suggest that the blocking ELISA should be useful as a serological test for BRSV antibodies. 相似文献
15.
Development of a blocking ELISA for screening antibodies to porcine rubulavirus, La Piedad Michoacan Virus. 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
A Nordengrahn M Svenda J Moreno-Lopez A Bergvall P Hernandez F McNeilly G Allan M Merza 《Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation》1999,11(4):319-323
A blocking enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was developed to detect antibodies to porcine rubulavirus (La Piedad Michoacan Virus [LPMV]) in serum samples from pigs. The test, based on a monoclonal antibody against the LPMV hemagglutinin-neuraminidase glycoprotein, had a sensitivity of 99% and a specificity of 97%. The results of this test were in agreement with those obtained by an indirect ELISA and hemagglutination inhibition, indirect immunofluorescence, and virus neutralization tests. The blocking ELISA is considered the most suitable test for routine screening for antibodies against LPMV. 相似文献
16.
Susy Carman Gaylan Josephson Beverly McEwen Grant Maxie Mioara Antochi Ken Eernisse Gopi Nayar Pat Halbur Gene Erickson Ernst Nilsson 《Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation》2002,14(2):97-105
A commercially available blocking ELISA was analyzed for its ability to identify antibodies to porcine coronaviruses (transmissible gastroenteritis virus [TGEV] or porcine respiratory coronavirus [PRCV]), to differentiate antibodies to TGEV and PRCV, and to identify TGEV-infected herds. Nine sera from uninfected pigs, 34 sera from 16 pigs experimentally infected with TGEV, and sera from 10 pigs experimentally infected with PRCV were evaluated using both the TGEV/PRCV blocking ELISA and a virus neutralization (VN) assay. The ELISA was not consistently effective in identifying pigs experimentally infected with TGEV until 21 days postinfection. Sera from 100 commercial swine herds (1,783 sera; median 15 per herd) were similarly evaluated using both tests. Thirty of these commercial herds had a clinical history of TGEV infection and a positive TGEV fluorescent antibody test recorded at necropsy within the last 35 months, while 70 herds had no history of clinical TGEV infection. The blocking ELISA and the VN showed good agreement (kappa 0.84) for the detection of porcine coronavirus antibody (TGEV or PRCV). The sensitivity (0.933) of the ELISA to identify TGEV-infected herds was good when considered on a herd basis. The ELISA was also highly specific (0.943) for the detection of TGEV-infected herds when the test results were evaluated on a herd basis. When sera from specific age groups were compared, the ELISA identified a greater proportion (0.83) of pigs in herds with TGEV antibody when suckling piglets were used. In repeatability experiments, the ELISA gave consistent results when the same sera were evaluated on different days (kappa 0.889) and when sera were evaluated before and after heating (kappa 0.888). The blocking ELISA was determined to be useful for herd monitoring programs and could be used alone without parallel use of the VN assay for the assessment of large swine populations for the detection of TGEV-infected herds. 相似文献
17.
Takada-Iwao A Uto T Mukai T Okada M Futo S Shibata I 《The Journal of veterinary medical science / the Japanese Society of Veterinary Science》2007,69(6):581-586
To facilitate the control of progressive atrophic rhinitis (PAR) of swine caused by toxigenic Pasteurella multocida, an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and a serum neutralization test (NT) have recently been developed to detect antibodies against the P. multocida dermonecrotic toxin (PmDNT). However, the NT is a cumbersome and time-consuming technique. To overcome these drawbacks, we developed an indirect ELISA, using recombinant PmDNT expressed in Escherichia coli, for the detection of antibodies to PmDNT in serum samples from pigs. The practical usefulness of this ELISA was compared with the NT using serum samples obtained from experimentally infected and naturally infected pigs. In the pigs experimentally inoculated with vaccine including PmDNT toxoid, the ELISA and neutralization antibodies were detected at almost the same time, and a good correlation was demonstrated between both tests (P<0.01, R(2)=0.807). Therefore, the ELISA can be used to evaluate the immune reaction of pigs after vaccination with P. multocida toxoid. In a survey conducted on a field herd with a history of clinical AR, the seropositivity by ELISA in pigs of age 4.5-6 months was increased even though the NT was negative, and the correlation was low between the results obtained with the two tests (P<0.01, R(2)=0.38). Therefore, the results indicated that this ELISA might be a useful alternative to the NT currently used to detect the antibody to PmDNT after vaccination or infection with P. multocida. 相似文献
18.
19.
A blocking ELISA was developed to detect antibodies directed against porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV). The PEDV antigen was first incubated with dilutions of test sera. Any antigen that was not blocked by antibodies in the serum was assayed in a double-antibody sandwich ELISA, using 2 monoclonal antibodies directed against different antigenic sites on PEDV as capture and detecting antibodies, respectively. The blocking ELISA was compared with a fixed-cell ELISA that used monolayers of Vero cells infected with PEDV prototype strain CV777 as a solid phase and a conjugate of an IgG-specific monoclonal antibody for antibody detection. Pigs were inoculated with PEDV strain CV777 or 1 of 2 field isolates, and antibody responses were measured by use of the 2 tests. Antibodies were detected by the blocking ELISA as early as postinoculation day 7 and, by the fixed-cell ELISA, as early as postinoculation day 14. From day 14 on, antibody titers for both tests correlated highly. Titers for the fixed-cell ELISA were 5.4 times higher than those for the blocking ELISA. The latter technique is easier to perform and discriminates well between infected and noninfected pigs, which makes this test useful for routine diagnosis and serologic surveys of porcine epidemic diarrhea. 相似文献
20.
A blocking enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) detecting antibodies against Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae (Ap) serotype 6 was developed. The blocking ELISA was based on the inhibition of a polyclonal antibody raised against Ap serotype 6. Purified lipopolysaccharide from Ap serotype 6 was used as antigen. The blocking ELISA was tested against sera from pigs experimentally infected with the 12 serotypes of Ap biotype 1. Cross-reaction with serotypes 3 and 8 but not with other serotypes was observed. The sensitivity and specificity of the test on a herd level were evaluated with sera from herds naturally infected with serotypes 2, 6, 8 or 12 and with sera from herds free of infection with any Ap serotype. The blocking ELISA showed a high herd sensitivity (1.00 (0.79-1.00)) and specificity (0.97 (0.93-0.99)). 相似文献